Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:30:51.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the effect of suckling stimulus on uterine involution, post-partum ovarian activity and fertility in Nili-Ravi buffaloes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. H. Usmani
Affiliation:
Animal Sciences Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, PO National Institute of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan
N. Ullah
Affiliation:
Animal Sciences Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, PO National Institute of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan
S. K. Shah
Affiliation:
Animal Sciences Institute, National Agricultural Research Centre, PO National Institute of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan
Get access

Abstract

Nineteen pluriparous buffaloes of Nili-Ravi breed which calved during the months of October and November 1983 were studied for the effects of sucking stimulus on the uterine involution, post-partum ovarian functions and fertility. On the day of calving, buffaloes were assigned to either a limited-suckling (LS) or non-suckling (NS) group. Changes in reproductive organs were monitored by rectal palpations at weekly intervals. Buffaloes were observed for oestrus twice daily (04.00 and 18.00 h) with the help of a teaser bull, and were artificially inseminated at the first post-partum and each subsequent oestrus. LS buffaloes had a shorter period to uterine involution (20 days) than NS buffaloes (28 days). Intervals to regression of the corpora lutea of pregnancy and to resumption of post-partum follicular development did not differ in the two groups. LS buffaloes had longer intervals to first post-partum oestrus and conception (54 and 88 days respectively) than NS buffaloes (39 and 68 days respectively). However, the difference in services per conception of LS and NS buffaloes was non-significant (2-05 v. 1·62). These limited data reveal that the suckling stimulus has a negative effect on the post-partum resumption of oestrous activity, and that conception is delayed. Further studies are indicated to verify these observations in a larger sample size and during all seasons of the year.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmad, N., Chaudhary, R. A., Tahir, M. and Ashraf, M. 1982. Seasonal variations in the frequency of oestrus, conception and calving in buffaloes under Pakistani conditions. Proc. 28th Pak. Sci. Conf., Multan, Pakistan, p. 58.Google Scholar
Bhalla, R. C., Sengar, D. P. S. and Soni, B. K. 1967. Studies on post-partum oestrus in Murrah buffaloes and Sahiwal cows and factors affecting them. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 20: 189191.Google Scholar
Cady, R. A., Shah, S. K., Schermerhorn, E. C. and McDowell, R. E. 1983. Factors affecting performance of Nili-Ravi buffaloes in Pakistan. J. Dairy Sci. 66: 578586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carruthers, T. D. and Hafs, H. D. 1980. Suckling and four-times daily milking: influence on ovulation, estrus and serum luteinising hormone, glucocorticoids and prolactin in postpartum Holsteins. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 919925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Fouly, M. A., Kotby, E. A. and El-Sobhy, H. E. 1976a. Post partum ovarian activity in suckled and milked buffaloes. Theriogenology 5: 6981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Fouly, M. A., Kotby, E. A. and El-Sobhy, H. E. 1976b. Effect of suckling on uterine and cervical involution in post-partum Egyptian buffaloes. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 46: 221227.Google Scholar
Fletcher, I. C. 1973. Effects of lactation, suckling and oxytocin on post-partum ovulation and oestrus in ewes. J. Reprod. Fert. 33: 293298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jainudeen, M. R., Bongso, T. A. and Tan, H. S. 1982/1983. Post partum ovarian activity and uterine involution in the suckled swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Anim. Reprod. Sci. 5: 181190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiracofe, G. H. 1980. Uterine involution: its role in regulating postpartum intervals. J. Anim. Sci. 51: Suppl. II, pp. 1626.Google ScholarPubMed
Morrow, D. A., Roberts, S. G. and McEntee, K. 1969. A review of postpartum ovarian activity and involution of the uterus and cervix in cattle. Cornell Vet. 59: 134154.Google ScholarPubMed
Saiduddin, S., Reisen, J. W., Tyler, W. J. and Casida, L. E. 1968. Relation of postpartum interval to pituitary gonadotropins, ovarian follicular development and fertility in dairy cows. Res. Bull., Univ. Wisconsin No. 270, pp. 1522.Google Scholar
Short, R. E., Randel, R. D. and Bellows, R. A. 1974. Factors affecting reproduction in the postpartum cow. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 226 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Singh, N., Chauhan, F. S. and Singh, M. 1979. Postpartum ovarian activity and fertility in buffaloes. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 32: 134139.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1962. Statistical Methods, p. 333. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Usmani, R. H., Ahmad, M. and Inskeep, E. K. 1983. Changes in reproductive organs and estrus activity in postpartum Nili-Ravi buffaloes. J. Anim. Sci. 57: Suppl. I, p. 378 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Walters, D. L., Kaltenbach, C. C., Dunn, T. G. and Short, R. E. 1982. Pituitary and ovarian function in psotpartum beef cows. I. Effects of suckling on serum and follicular fluid hormones and follicular gonadotropin receptors. Biol. Reprod. 26: 640646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, M. B., Anderson, G. B., Munro, C. J. and Stabenfeldt, G. H. 1982. Prolactin response in beef cows and heifers suckling one or two calves. J. Reprod. Fert. 64: 243249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, G. L., Kotwica, J., Slanger, W. D., Olson, D. K., Tilton, J. E. and Johnson, L. J. 1982. Effect of suckling on pituitary responsiveness to gonadotropin-releasing hormone throughout the early postpartum period of beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 54: 594602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed