Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:45:29.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using Rapid Improvement Events for Disaster After-Action Reviews: Experience in a Hospital Information Technology Outage and Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2018

Charles M. Little*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado and the Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, ColoradoUSA
Christopher McStay
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, ColoradoUSA
Justin Oeth
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, ColoradoUSA
April Koehler
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, ColoradoUSA
Kelly Bookman
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, ColoradoUSA
*
Correspondence: Charles M. Little, DO, Department of Emergency Medicine University of Colorado 12401 E. 17th Ave B215 Aurora, Colorado 80045 USA E-mail: Charles.Little@ucdenver.edu

Abstract

The use of after-action reviews (AARs) following major emergency events, such as a disaster, is common and mandated for hospitals and similar organizations. There is a recurrent challenge of identified problems not being resolved and repeated in subsequent events. A process improvement technique called a rapid improvement event (RIE) was used to conduct an AAR following a complete information technology (IT) outage at a large urban hospital. Using RIE methodology to conduct the AAR allowed for the rapid development and implementation of major process improvements to prepare for future IT downtime events. Thus, process improvement methodology, particularly the RIE, is suited for conducting AARs following disasters and holds promise for improving outcomes in emergency management.

LittleCM, McStayC, OethJ, KoehlerA, BookmanK. Using Rapid Improvement Events for Disaster After-Action Reviews: Experience in a Hospital Information Technology Outage and Response. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(1):98–100.

Type
Special Reports
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: none

References

1. Savoia, E, Agboola, F, Biddinger, PD. Use of after action reports (AARs) to promote organizational and systems learning in emergency preparedness. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(8):2949.Google Scholar
2. Baird, L, Henderson, JC, Watts, S. Learning from action: an analysis of the Center for Army Lessons Learned [CALL]. Human Resource Management (1986-1998). 1997;36(4):385.Google Scholar
3. The Joint Commission. Emergency Management Standards. 2017; https://e-dition.jcrinc.com/ASearch.aspx. Accessed April 1, 2017.Google Scholar
4. US Department of Homeland Security. Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Volume I: HSEEP Overview and Exercise Program Management. Washington, DC USA: US DHS; 2007.Google Scholar
5. Donahue, A, Tuohy, R. Lessons we don’t learn: a study of the lessons of disasters, why we repeat them, and how we can learn them. Homeland Security Affairs. 2006;2(4).Google Scholar
6. Martin, SC, Greenhouse, PK, Kowinsky, AM, McElheny, RL, Petras, CR, Sharbaugh, DT. Rapid improvement event: an alternative approach to improving care delivery and the patient experience. J Nurs Care Qual. 2009;24(1):17-24; quiz 5-6.Google Scholar
7. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Programs. 2017. https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index.html?redirect=/EHRIncentivePrograms/. Accessed June 13, 2017.Google Scholar
8. Sittig, DF, Singh, H. A socio-technical approach to preventing, mitigating, and recovering from ransomware attacks. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7(2):624-632.Google Scholar