Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:08:36.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

After Exoneration: Attributions of Responsibility Impact Perceptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2018

Meaghan E. Savage
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Science and Humanities University of Ontario Institute of Technologymeaghansavage@gmail.com
Kimberley A. Clow
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Science and Humanities University of Ontario Institute of Technologykimberley.clow@uoit.ca
Regina A. Schuller
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology York Universityschuller@yorku.ca
Rosemary Ricciardelli
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology Memorial University of Newfoundlandrricciardell@mun.ca

Abstract

Guided by Weiner’s (1993, Am Psychol 48:957-964) attribution theory of social motivation, we examined perceptions of exonerees. Specifically, we examined whether biased police procedures impacted perceptions of responsibility, emotional reactions, and willingness to assist exonerees. Participants read a vignette involving an exoneration due to either a false confession or an eyewitness misidentification with police practices (biased vs. unbiased) manipulated across participants. Findings corroborate that participants hold more negative views of exonerees who falsely confess than exonerees who were mistakenly identified by eyewitnesses. Moreover, when police bias was high, participants were angrier at the police and less likely to perceive the exoneree as responsible for the wrongful conviction—especially when false confessions were involved. The findings are discussed in light of Weiner’s social motivation theory, and in regards to improving attitudes towards individuals who have been wrongly convicted.

Résumé

Guidée par la théorie de l’attribution causale de Weiner (1993, Am Psychol 48:957-964), nous avons examiné les perceptions des exonérés. Plus spécifiquement, nous nous sommes intéressés à savoir si les procédures policières biaisées avaient une incidence sur les perceptions de la responsabilité, les réactions émotionnelles et la volonté d’aider les exonérés. Les participants lisent une vignette décrivant une exonération résultant de faux aveux ou d’une identification erronée de la part d’un témoin oculaire dans le cadre d’une manipulation de pratiques policières (biaisées ou non) parmi les participants. Les résultats confirment que les participants ont des opinions plus négatives à l’égard des exonérés qui font de faux aveux que vis-à-vis les exonérés identifiés par erreur, par des témoins oculaires. De plus, lorsque les pratiques policières étaient fortement biaisées, les participants ressentaient davantage de colère à l’égard de la police et étaient moins susceptibles de percevoir l’exonéré comme responsable de la condamnation injustifiée – en particulier lorsque de faux aveux étaient en cause. Les résultats sont analysés à l’aide de la théorie de la motivation sociale de Weiner, et dans le but d’améliorer les attitudes envers les personnes qui ont été condamnées à tort.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association / Association Canadienne Droit et Société 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blandisi, Isabella M., Clow, Kimberley A., and Ricciardelli, Rosemary. 2015. Public perceptions of the stigmatization of wrongly convicted individuals: Findings from semi-structured interviews. The Qualitative Report 20 (11): 18811904.Google Scholar
CBC News. B.C. 2010. Man acquitted on decades-old rape convictions. CBC News, 27 October 2010. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/b-c-man-acquitted-on-decades-old-rape-convictions-1.875173Google Scholar
Clow, Kimberley A. 2017. Does the “wrongful” part of wrongful conviction make a difference in the job market? In After Prison: Navigating Employment and Reintegration, ed. Ricciardelli, Rose and Peters, Adrienne M. F., 243–57. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clow, Kimberley A., Lant, James M., and Cutler, Brian L.. 2013. Perceptions of defendant culpability in pretrial publicity: The effects of defendant ethnicity and participant gender. Race and Social Problems 5: 250–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clow, Kimberley A., and Leach, Amy-May. 2015a. Stigma and wrongful conviction: All exonerees are not perceived equal. Psychology, Crime & Law 21 (2): 172–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clow, Kimberley A., and Amy-May, Leach. 2015b. After innocence: Perceptions of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted. Legal and Criminological Psychology 20: 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clow, Kimberley A., and Ricciardelli, Rosemary. 2015. Wrongly convicted and wrongly incarcerated: Exoneree experiences and public perceptions. In Experiencing Imprisonment: Research on the Experience of Living and Working in Carceral Institutions, ed. Reeves, Carla, 264–79. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Department of Justice. 2018. Applications for Ministerial Review – Miscarriages of Justice, Annual Report 2017. 2017 www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/ccr-rc/rep17-rap17/rep17.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Justice. 2017a. Criminal Conviction Review. Last modified 2 October 2017. http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/ccr-rc/Google Scholar
Department of Justice. 2017b. Indigenous overrepresentation in the criminal justice system. Last modified 14 February 2018. www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/jf-pf/2017/jan02.htmlGoogle Scholar
Department of Justice. 2004. Report of the Working Group on the Prevention of Miscarriages of Justice. Last modified 7 January 2015. www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/cj-jp/ccr-rc/pmj-pej/toc-tdm.htmlGoogle Scholar
Drizin, Steven A., and Leo, Richard A.. 2004. The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review 82: 8911007.Google Scholar
Dysart, Jennifer E., Lindsay, R. C. L., and Dupuis, Paul R.. 2006. Showups: The critical issue of clothing bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20: 1009–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. 1987. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. New Jersey: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Fong, Petti. 2010. B.C. man acquitted of rapes after 26 years in jail. Toronto Star, 27 October. https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2010/10/27/bc_man_acquitted_of_rapes_after_26_years_in_jail.htmlGoogle Scholar
Freire, Alejo, Lee, Kang, Williamson, Karen S., Stuart, Sarah J. E., and Lindsay, R. C. L.. 2004. Lineup identification by children: Effects of clothing bias. Law and Human Behavior 28: 339–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frenda, Steven J., Nichols, Rebecca M., and Loftus, Elizabeth F.. 2011. Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20 (1): 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L. 2008. Judging innocence. Columbia Law Review 108: 55142.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Daniel T., and Malone, Patrick S.. 1995. The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin 117 (1): 2138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goudge, Stephen T. 2008. Pediatric forensic pathology report: Inquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in Ontario. Last modified 1 October 2008. https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/goudge/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Grounds, Adrian T. 2004. Psychological consequences of wrongful conviction and imprisonment. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 46 (2): 165–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grounds, Adrian T. 2005. Understanding the effects of wrongful imprisonment. Crime and Justice 32: 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudjonsson, Gisli H. 2010. The psychology of false confessions: A review of the current evidence. In Police Interrogations and False Confessions: Current Research, Practice, and Policy Recommendations, ed. Daniel Lassiter, G. and Meissner, Christian A., 3147. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddock, Geoffrey, Zanna, Mark P., and Esses, Victoria M.. 1993. Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (6): 1105–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Neal. 2009. Ivan Henry’s 1982 Police lineup photo released. Ottawa Citizen, 16 January. www.ottawacitizen.com/news/ivan+henry+1982+police+lineup+photo+released/1185248/story.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hosch, H. M., Culhane, S. E., Tubb, V. A., and Granillo, E. A.. 2011. Town vs. gown: A direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 29: 452–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, C. Ronald. 2002. Wrongful conviction and public policy: The American Society of Criminology 2001 Presidential Address. Criminology 40 (1): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innocence Canada. 2018. Current cases: Case management statistics. www.innocencecanada.com/current-cases/Google Scholar
Innocence Project. 2017a. Main page. www.innocenceproject.orgGoogle Scholar
Innocence Project. 2017b. Eyewitness identification. www.innocenceproject.org/causes/eyewitness-misidentification/Google Scholar
Innocence Project. 2017c. False confessions or admissions. www.innocenceproject.org/causes/false-confessions-admissions/Google Scholar
Kassin, Saul M. 1997. The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist 52: 221–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassin, Saul M. 2015. The social psychology of false confessions. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9 (1): 2551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassin, Saul M., and Kiechel, Katherine L.. 1996. The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science 7 (3): 125–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leo, Richard A. 2005. Rethinking the study of miscarriages of justice: Developing a criminology of wrongful conviction. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 21 (3): 201–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, R. C. L., Wallbridge, Harold, and Drennan, Daphne. 1987. Do clothes make the man? An exploration of the effect of lineup attire on eyewitness identification accuracy. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 19: 463–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, R. C. L., and Wells, Gary L.. 1985. Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations. Journal of Applied Psychology 70: 556–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, John G., Krauss, Daniel A., and Lieberman, Joel D.. 2010. Reality check: A comparison of college students and a community sample of mock jurors in a simulated sexual violent predator civil commitment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 28: 730750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeder, Evelyn M., Yamamoto, Susan, and Fenwick, Kristin L.. 2015. Educating Canadian jurors about the not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder defence. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 47 (3): 226–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgrew, Ian. 2009. Something good may have come from Pickton case—Justice for Ivan Henry. The Vancouver Sun, 14 January. www.vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/something+good+have+come+from+pickton+case+justice+ivan+henry/1173376/story.htmlGoogle Scholar
National Registry of Exonerations. 2017a. About the Registry. www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/about.aspxGoogle Scholar
National Registry of Exonerations. 2017b. Race and wrongful convictions. www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/Race-and-Wrongful-Convictions.aspxGoogle Scholar
National Registry of Exonerations. 2015. % Exonerations by contributing factor. www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/ExonerationsContribFactorsByCrime.aspxGoogle Scholar
Norris, Robert J. 2012. Assessing compensation statutes for the wrongly convicted. Criminal Justice Policy Review 23: 352–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillion, Romeo. 2012. Wrongful Conviction Night, hosted by the University of Ontario Institute of Technology’s Student Law Society. Oshawa, ON.Google Scholar
Quinlivan, Deah S., Wells, Gary L., Neuschatz, Jeffrey S., Luecht, Katherine M., Cash, Daniella K., and Key, Kylie N.. 2017. The effects of pre-admonition suggestions on eyewitnesses’ choosing rates and retrospective identification judgments. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 32 (3): 236–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattner, Arye. 1988. Convicted but innocent: Wrongful convictions and the criminal justice system. Law and Human Behaviour 12 (3): 2651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, Kent. 2012. Wrongful convictions in Canada. University of Cincinnati Law Review 80 (4): 14651526.Google Scholar
Robins, Sydney L. 2008. In the matter of Steven Truscott: Advisory opinion on the issue of compensation. Last modified 1 June 2016. https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/truscott/Google Scholar
Rudolph, Udo, Roesch, Scott, Greitemeyer, Tobias, and Weiner, Bernard. 2004. A meta-analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation. Cognition and Emotion 18 (6): 815–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharps, Matthew J., Janigian, Jessica, Hess, Adam B., and Hayward, Bill. 2009. Eyewitness memory in context: Toward a taxonomy of eyewitness error. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 24: 3644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Canadian Press. 2015. Ivan Henry’s lawyer presents alarming evidence in wrongful conviction lawsuit. The Huffington Post, 31 August. www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/08/31/ivan-henry-wrongful-conviction_n_8067210.htmlGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Heather. 2009. Rebuilding a life: The wrongfully convicted and exonerated. Public Interest Law Journal 18: 427–37.Google Scholar
Weiner, Bernard. 1993. On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist 48: 957–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, Bernard, Perry, Raymond P., and Magnusson, Jamie. 1988. An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 (5): 738748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westervelt, Saundra D., and Cook, Kimberly J.. 2008. Coping with innocence after death row. Contexts 7: 3237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar