Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:47:40.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Valence Band Electronic Structure of Cleaved Iron Oxide Single Crystals Studied by Resonant Photoemission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Robert J. Lad  and
Victor E. Henrich
Robert J. Lad
Affiliation:
Applied Physics, Yale University, 15 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06520
Victor E. Henrich
Affiliation:
Applied Physics, Yale University, 15 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06520
Get access

Abstract

Synchrotron radiation has been used to perform resonant photoemission measurements across the 3p→3d photoabsorption threshold from cleaved FexO (x ≃0.945), Fe3O4, and α-Fe2O3 single crystal surfaces. The resonant enhancement of the Fe 3d photoelectrons allows the Fe 3d-derived final states in the valence band to be distinguished from the overlapping O 2p states. Using well-characterized single crystals, the distributions of Fe 3d-derived states associated with the ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+) cations have been identified. The Fe 3d-derived states are found to extend about 18 eV below the Fermi level in each oxide, which can be attributed to a significant amount of hybridization between the Fe 3d and O 2p orbitals.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 143: Symposium V – Synchrotron Radiation in Materials Research , 1988 , 73
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Eastman, D.E. and Freeouf, J.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 395 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Alvarado, S.F., Erbudak, M., and Munz, P., Phys. Rev. B 14, 2740 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Brundle, C.R., Chuang, T.J., and Wandelt, K., Surface Sci. 68, 459 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] McIntyre, N.S. and Zetaruk, D.G., Anal. Chem. 49, 1521 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Bagus, P.S., Brundle, C.R., Chuang, T.J., and Wandelt, K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1229 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Grenet, G., Jugnet, Y., Duc, T.M., and Kibler, M., J. Chem. Phys. 72, 218 (1980); G. Grenet, Y. Jugnet, T.M. Duc, and M. Kibler, J. Chem. Phys. 74, 2163 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Fujimori, A., Minami, F., and Sugano, S., Phys. Rev. B 29, 5225 (1984); A. Fujimori and F. Minami, Phys. Rev., 30, 957 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Fujimori, A., Saeki, M., Kimizuka, N., Taniguchi, M., and Suga, S., Phys. Rev. B34, 7318 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Zaanen, J., Sawatzky, G.A., and Allen, J.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 418 (1985); J. Magn. Mat. 54–57, 607 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Lad, R.J. and Henrich, V.E., Phys. Rev. B (to be published).Google Scholar
[11] Davis, L.C., J. Appl. Phys., 59, R25 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Fujimori, A., Kimizuka, N., Taniguchi, M., and Suga, S., Phys. Rev. B 36, 6691 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Lad, R.J. and Henrich, V.E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A (to be published).Google Scholar