Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:35:42.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing the Received Pronunciation of J. R. Firth and Daniel Jones: A sociophonetic perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2018

Joanna Przedlacka  and
Michael Ashby
Joanna Przedlacka
Affiliation:
Oxford University Phonetics Laboratoryjoanna.przedlacka@phon.ox.ac.uk
Michael Ashby
Affiliation:
Speech Hearing and Phonetic Sciences, University College Londonm.ashby@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study focuses on a corpus assembled from commercial recordings of 1929 and 1932 featuring the two British linguists J. R. Firth (1890–1960) and Daniel Jones (1881–1967). The aim is to analyse and quantify differences in the Received Pronunciation (RP) used by the two men, in relation to sociolinguistic and stylistic variation within RP of the period. A systematic acoustic analysis reveals that whereas the vowel systems of the two speakers are closely similar in most respects, there are significant differences in the realizations of the trap, price and dress qualities. We show that each of these has a well-documented history of variation in RP, and find that in each case Firth is employing the higher-class or more prestigious variant, which is a reversal of expectations based on what is known about the social and regional origins of the two. We consider the possible roles of social background, avoidance of regional features and hypercorrection. The outcomes of our work are (i) an illustration of RP used in the interwar period for the purposes of teaching English as a foreign language, (ii) empirical evidence for internal variation within the accent, (iii) additional insights into the stylistic and social correlates of this variation, and (iv) a demonstration that satisfactory formant analyses can be conducted with recordings from as early as the 1920s. Overall, it is hoped that this case-study will both throw light on the ‘standard’ accent of the era and inspire further sociophonetic investigations with legacy recordings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , December 2019 , pp. 381 - 400
Copyright
© International Phonetic Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, David. 1991. Fifty years in phonetics: Selected papers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Avery, Elizabeth, Dorsey, Jane & Sickels, Vera A.. 1928. First principles of speech training. New York: D. Appleton & Co.Google Scholar
Baumann, Heinrich. 1905. Der kleine Toussaint-Langenscheidt Englisch: Methode Toussaint-Langenscheidt; mit Angabe der Aussprache nach dem phonetischen System der Methode Toussaint-Langenscheidt; zur schnellen Aneigung der Umgangssprache durch Selbstunterricht; Reisesprachführer, Konversationsbuch. Berlin-Schöneberg: G. Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Bennett, Rodney. 1930. The play way of speech training. London: Evans Brothers.Google Scholar
Butcher, Andrew. 1982. Cardinal vowels and other problems. In Crystal, David (ed.), Linguistic controversies: Essays in linguistic theory and practice in honour of F. R. Palmer, 50–72. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Collins, Beverley Simeon & Mees, Inger M.. 1999. The real Professor Higgins: The life and career of Daniel Jones. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 2008. Gimson's Pronunciation of English, 7th edn. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 2014. Gimson's Pronunciation of English, 8th edn. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deterding, David. 1997. The formants of monophthong vowels in Standard Southern British English pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 27, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Paolo, Marianna & Yaeger-Dror, Malcah. 2011. Field methods: Gathering data, creating a corpus, and reporting your work. In Di Paolo, Marianna & Yaeger-Dror, Malcah (eds.), Sociophonetics: A student's guide, 7–23. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. J. 1874. On early English pronunciation, vol. 4. London: Asher & Co. for the Philological Society.Google Scholar
Fabricius, Anne H. 2007. Variation and change in the trap and strut vowels of RP: A real time comparison of five acoustic data sets. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37 (3), 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, Anne H., Watt, Dominic & Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. A comparison of three speaker-intrinsic vowel formant frequency normalization algorithms for sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 21, 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1930. Speech. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1934. Review of Stinchfield Hawk (1933). Philosophy 9 (35), 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. & Singh, M. G.. 1929. Pioneers: Selected prose for language study. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. 1980. An introduction to the pronunciation of English, 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. 1994. An introduction to the pronunciation of English, 5th edn., edited by Alan Cruttenden. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hannisdal, Bente. 2006. Variability and change in Received Pronunciation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Palethorpe, Sallyanne & Watson, Catherine. 2000. Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: An acoustic analysis of the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30 (1–2), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Philip. 2013. Making accurate formant measurements: An empirical investigation of the influence of the measurement tool, analysis settings and speaker on formant measurements. Ph.D. dissertation, University of York. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/7393/.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Sarah & Midgley, Jonathan. 2005. Formant frequencies of RP monophthongs in four age groups of speakers. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35 (2), 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckvale, Mark. 2013. Speech Filing System. http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/resource/sfs/ (20 March 2015).Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D. & Auger, Julie. 1992. Quantitative evidence, qualitative hypercorrection, sociolinguistic variables – and French speakers’ 'eadaches with English h/Ø. Language and Communication 12 (3–4), 195–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1909a. Intonation curves: A collection of phonetic texts, in which intonation is marked throughout by means of curved lines on a musical stave. Leipzig & Berlin: B G Teubner.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1909b. The pronunciation of English: Phonetics and phonetic transcriptions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1917. An English pronouncing dictionary, using the alphabet of the International Phonetic Association, 1st edn. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1918. An outline of English phonetics. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1926. An English pronouncing dictionary: Showing the pronunciation of over 50,000 words in international phonetic transcription, 3rd edn. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1932. An outline of English phonetics, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1935. Speech training: A symposium. The phonetic aspect. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 5, 10–40.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1937a. An English pronouncing dictionary: Showing the pronunciation of over 50,000 words in international phonetic transcription, 4th edn. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1937b. On “Received Pronunciation” (Supplement to Le Maître Phonétique).Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1962. An outline of English phonetics, 9th edn., reprint, with further alterations. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Kenrick, William. 1773. A new dictionary of the English language: To which is prefixed a rhetorical grammar. London: Printed for John and Francis Rivington, William Johnston, Thomas Longman, and Thomas Cadell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: The Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972a. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972b. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1967. Three areas of experimental phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laguna, Grace Mead Andrus de. 1927. Speech: Its function and development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindsey, Geoff. 2013. The vowel space. english speech services. http://englishspeechservices.com/blog/the-vowel-space/ (18 January 2017).Google Scholar
Love, Nigel. 1988. The linguistic thought of J. R. Firth. In Harris, Roy (ed.), Linguistic thought in England 1914–1945, 148–164. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
MacMahon, Michael K. C. 1998. Phonology. In Romaine, Suzanne (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 4: 1776–1997, 373–535. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.006.Google Scholar
Markey, John Fordyce. 1928. The symbolic process and its integration in children: A study in social psychology. London: Kegan Paul & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbolt, Sir Henry John (ed.). 1921. The teaching of English in England: Being the report of the departmental committee appointed by the president of the Board of Education to inquire into the position of English in the educational system of England. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold. 1933. The phonology of a south Durham dialect: Descriptive, historical, and comparative. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Petyt, Keith Malcolm. 1985. ‘Dialect’ and ‘accent’ in industrial West Yorkshire. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillsbury, Walter Bowers & Meader, Clarence Linton. 1928. The psychology of language. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Plug, Leendert. 2008. J. R. Firth: A new biography. Transactions of the Philological Society 106 (3), 337–374. doi:10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00203.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przedlacka, Joanna. 2012. A historical study of Voice Onset Time in Received Pronunciation. In Esquibel, Joanna & Wojtyś, Anna (eds.), Explorations in the English language: Middle Ages and beyond. Festschrift for Professor Jerzy Wełna on the occasion of his 70th birthday (Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature 35), 67–76. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 1999. Styling the other: Introduction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3–4, 421–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Alan S. C. 1954. Linguistic class-indicators in present-day English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 55 (1), 20–56.Google Scholar
Smart, Benjamin Humphrey. 1836. Walker remodelled: A new critical pronouncing dictionary of the English language. London: T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Smith, Richard. 2005. An investigation into the roots of ELT, with a particular focus on the career and legacy of Harold E. Palmer (1877–1949). Ph.D thesis, University of Edinburgh. https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/6750 (15 October 2017).Google Scholar
Hawk, Stinchfield, Mae, Sara. 1933. Speech disorders: A psychological study of the various defects of speech. London & New York: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. & Kendall, Tyler. 2015. NORM: Vowel Normalization Suite 1.1. http://lingtools.uoregon.edu/norm/about_norm1.php (28 June 2017).Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1999. Standard English: What it isn't. In Tony Bex & Watts, Richard J. (eds.), Standard English: The widening debate, 117–128. London: Routlefge.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2003. A glossary of sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Standard English: What it isn't. http://lagb-education.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/SEtrudgill2011.pdf. [Revised version of Trudgill 1999]Google Scholar
UCL [University College London]. 1933. UCL calendar for 1933–34.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive. 2007. Introduction to Alan S. C. Ross (1954) “Linguistic class-indicators in present-day English”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 108 (1a), 109–111.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive. 2012. An evolving standard British English. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Standards of English: Codified varieties around the world (Studies in English Language Series), 55–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Ida C. 1929. The phonetics of English. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Watt, Dominic & Fabricius, Anne H.. 2011. A measure of variable planar locations anchored on the centroid of the vowel space: A sociophonetic research tool. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikström, Jussi. 2013. An acoustic study of the RP English lot and thought vowels. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Ann & Kerswill, Paul. 1999. Dialect levelling: Milton Keynes, Reading, Hull. In Foulkes, Paul & Docherty, Gerard J. (eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles, 141–162. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Woodthorpe, R. C. 1932. The public school murder. London: Nicholson & Watson.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard. 2003. Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In Local, John, Ogden, Richard & Temple, Rosalind (eds.), Phonetic interpretation (Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI), 75–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wyld, Henry Cecil. 1920. A history of modern colloquial English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar