Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:07:05.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The structural power of business: taking structure, agency and ideas seriously

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

David Marsh ,
Sadiya Akram  and
Holly Birkett
Sadiya Akram
Affiliation:
Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis, University of Canberra, Australia
Holly Birkett
Affiliation:
Birmingham Business School, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The power of business is a very important issue for understanding the operation of democracy, but establishing the nature and extent of its power is not easy. We acknowledge that this is, in large part, an empirical problem and requires a more sophisticated conceptual framework to address it. Attempting to address this, the recent literature on the power of business has increasingly focused on the role of structure, agents and ideas. However, too little attention has been paid to how these concepts are defined and conceptualized. We argue that it is crucial to: specify the structures (economic/political/social) which we see as affecting the role of business; identify the agents, collective and individual, involved and how they interact; and specify which ideas are playing a role, at what level of generality and how these different ideas at different levels of generality interact. This article explores these issues through a critical consideration of the extant literature in order to provide a more developed framework for future empirical analysis.

Type
Research articles
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 17 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Structural Power and the Study of Business: Guest Editor: Pepper D. Culpepper , October 2015 , pp. 577 - 601
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2015 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akram, Sadiya. 2012. “Fully Unconscious and Prone to Habit: The Characteristics of Agency in the Structure and Agency Dialectic.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (1): 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akram, Sadiya, Emerson, Guy, and Marsh, David. 2015. “The Faces of Power Argument Revisited; The Pre-Conscious as the Fourth Face of Power.” Mimeo, IGPA, University of Canberra, Available from .Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetham, David. 2011. “Unelected Oligarchy: Corporate and Financial Dominance in Britain's Democracy.” Liverpool: Democratic Audit. http://filestore.democraticauditarchive.com/file/de232c951e8286baa79af208ac250112-1311676243/oligarchy.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2015.Google Scholar
Bell, Stephen. 2011. “Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change?” British Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 883–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Stephen. 2012. “The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Mediation of the Structural Power of Business.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (4): 661–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Stephen, and Hindmoor, Andy. 2014a. “Rethinking the Structural Power of Business: The Strange Case of the Australian Mining Tax.” New Political Economy 19 (3): 470–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Stephen, and Hindmoor, Andy. 2014b. “The Ideational Shaping of State Power and Capacity: Wining Battles but Losing the War over Bank Reform in the US and UK.” Government and Opposition 49 (3): 342–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Stephen, and Hindmoor, Andy. 2014c. “Taming the City? Ideas, Structural Power and the Evolution of British Banking Policy Amidst the Great Financial Meltdown.” New Political Economy 20 (3): 454–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Stephen, and Hindmoor, Andy. 2015. “Masters of the Universe but Slaves of the Market: Bankers and the Great Financial Meltdown.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 17 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkett, Holly, and Marsh, David. 2014. “Reconceptualising Class: Two Cheers for the Bourdieusian Turn.” Available from: .Google Scholar
Block, Fred. 1977. “The Ruling Class Does Not Rule.” Socialist Revolution 33 (May-June): 6–28.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2003. “Structures Do Not Come with Instruction Sheets: Interests, Ideas and Progress in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (4): 696–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bo, Ernesto. 2006. “Regulatory Capture: A Review.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22 (2): 203–225.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction. London: RKP.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper. 2011. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper, and Reinke, Raphael. 2014. “Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States.” Politics and Society 42 (4): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Mische, Ann. 1998. “What is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, Paul, and Marsh, David. 2015. “Historical Institutionalism and Critical Realism.” Available from: .Google Scholar
Furlong, Paul and Marsh, David. 2010. “A Skin Not a Pullover: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, edited by Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2002. Political Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindmoor, Andy, and McGeechan, Josh. 2013. “Luck, Systematic Luck and Business Power: Lucky All the Way Down or Trying Hard to get What it Wants without Trying.” Political Studies 61 (4): 834–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Johal, Sukhdev, Moran, Michael, and Williams, Karel. 2014. “Power, Politics and the City of London after the Great Financial Crisis.” Government and Opposition 49 (3): 400–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konings, Martijn. 2009. “The Construction of US Financial Power.” Review of International Studies 35 (1): 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lukes, Stephen. 1974 (2005). Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manley, John. 1983. “Neo-Pluralism: A Class Analysis of Pluralism I and Pluralism II.” American Political Science Review 77 (2): 368–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, David. 1983. “Interest Group Activity and Structural Power: Lindblom's Politics and Markets .” West European Politics 6 (2): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, David. 2009. “Keeping Ideas in their Place: In Praise of Thin Constructivism.” Australian Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 679–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, David. 2010. “Meta-Theoretical Issues.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, edited by Marsh, David and Stoker, Gerry. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, David, Lewis, Chris, and Chesters, Jenny. 2014. “The Political Power of Big Business: The Big Miners and the Mining Tax.” Australian Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 711–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAnulla, Stuart. 2002. “Structure and Agency.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, edited by Marsh, David and Stoker, Gerry. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
McAnulla, Stuart. 2006. “Challenging the New Interpretivist Approach: Towards a Critical Realist Alternative.” British Politics 1: 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Michael, and Payne, Anthony. 2014. “Introduction: Neglecting, Rediscovering and Thinking Again about Power in Finance.” Government and Opposition 49 (3): 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, David. 1987. “Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent From the New Conventional Wisdom.” British Political Science 17 (4): 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, David. 1989. Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America. Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar
Ward, Hugh. 1987. “Structural Power – A Contradiction in Terms?” Political Studies 35 (4): 593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Helen, and Skeggs, Beverly. 2004. “Notes on Ethical Scenarios of Self on British Reality TV.” Feminist Media Studies 4 (2): 205–208.Google Scholar