Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:30:48.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High Quality in.Ga1−xas Heterostructures Grown on GaAs With Movpe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M.T. Bulsara
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139
E.A. Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139
Get access

Abstract

InxGa1−xAs structures with compositionally graded buffers were grown by metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) on GaAs substrates and characterized with plan-view and cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (PV-TEM and X-TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and x-ray diffraction (XRD). The results show that surface roughness experiences a maximum at growth temperatures where phase separation occurs in InxGa1−xAs. The strain energy due misfit dislocations in the graded buffer indirectly influences phase separation. At growth temperatures above and below this temperature, the surface roughness is decreased significantly; however, only growth temperatures above this regime ensure nearly complete relaxed graded buffers with the most uniform composition caps. With the optimum growth temperature for grading InxGa1−xAs determined to be 700°C, it was possible to produce In0.33Ga0.67As diode structures on GaAs with threading dislocation densities < 8.5 × 106/cm2

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Uchida, T., Kurakake, H., Soda, H., and Yamazaki, S., J. Elec. Mat., 12 (4), 581 (1996).Google Scholar
[2] Goorsky, M.S., Eldredge, J.W., Lord, S.M., and Harris, J.S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12, 1034 (1994).Google Scholar
[3] Samavedam, S. and Fitzgerald, E.A., J. Appl. Phys., 81 (7), 3108, (1997).Google Scholar
[4] Mahajan, S., Mat. Sci. and Eng. B, 30, 187 (1995).Google Scholar
[5] Glas, F., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser., No. 134, 269 (1993).Google Scholar
[6] Stringfellow, G.B., J. Crysal Growth, 27, 21 (1974).Google Scholar
[7] Fitzgerald, E.A., Xie, Y.-H., Monroe, D., Silverman, P.J., Kuo, J.M., Kortan, A.R., Thiel, F.A., and Weir, B.E., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B, 10 (4), 1807 (1992).Google Scholar
[8] Lord, S.M., Pezeshki, B., Marshall, A.F., Harris, J.S. Jr., Fernandez, R., and Harwit, A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 281, 221 (1993).Google Scholar
[9] Fitzgerald, E.A., Samavedam, S., Xie, Y.-H. and Giovanne, L.M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 15, 1048, (1997).Google Scholar