Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:20:52.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Smoothing Thin Films with Gas-Cluster Ion Beams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

D.B. Fenner ,
J. Hautala ,
L.P. Allen ,
J.A. Greer ,
W.J. Skinner  and
J.I. Budnick
D.B. Fenner
Affiliation:
Epion Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts
J. Hautala
Affiliation:
Epion Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts
L.P. Allen
Affiliation:
Epion Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts
J.A. Greer
Affiliation:
Epion Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts
W.J. Skinner
Affiliation:
Epion Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts
J.I. Budnick
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
Get access

Abstract

Thin-film magnetic sensor and memory devices in future generations may benefit from a processing tool for final-step etching and smoothing of surfaces to nearly an atomic scale. Gas-cluster ion-beam (GCIB) systems make possible improved surface sputtering and processing for many types of materials. We propose application of GCIB processing as a key smoothing step in thin-film magnetic-materials technology, especially spin-valve GMR. Results of argon GCIB etching and smoothing of surfaces of alumina, silicon, permalloy and tantalum films are reported. No accumulating roughness or damage is observed. The distinct scratches and tracks seen in atomic-force microscopy of CMP-processed surfaces, are removed almost entirely by subsequent GCIB processing. The technique primarily reduces high spatial-frequency roughness and renders the topographic surface elevations more nearly gaussian (randomly distributed).

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 614: Symposium F – Magnetic Materials, Structures & Processing for Information… , 2000 , F10.3.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Choe, G. and Steinback, M., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 5777 (1999).10.1063/1.370123Google Scholar
2. Li, M., Wang, G.-C. and Min, H.-G., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 5313 (1998).10.1063/1.367357Google Scholar
3. Dieny, B., Speriosu, V.S., Metin, S., Parkin, S.S.P., Gurney, B.A., Baumgart, P. and Wilhoit, D.R., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 4774 (1991).10.1063/1.348252Google Scholar
4. Schep, K.M., Kelly, P.J. and Bauer, G.E.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 586 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.586Google Scholar
5. Slonczewski, J.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3172 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.3172Google Scholar
6. Parkin, S.S.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1358 (1992).10.1063/1.107591Google Scholar
7. Qiu, Z.Q., Pearson, J. and Bader, S.D., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 5765 (1993).10.1063/1.353568Google Scholar
8. Kools, J.C.S., Rijks, Th.G.S.M., Veirman, A.E.M. De and Coehoorn, R., IEEE Trans. Mag. 31, 3918 (1995); J.C.S. Kools, IEEE Trans. Mag. 32, 3165 (1996); J.C.S. Kools, W. Kula, D. Mauri and T. Lin, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 4466 (1999).10.1109/20.489816Google Scholar
9. Néel, L., Comptes Rendus 255, 1676 (1962).Google Scholar
10. Edelstein, A.S., Bussmann, K.M., Turner, D.C. and Chopra, H.D., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 4848 (1998).10.1063/1.367282Google Scholar
11. Egelhoff, W.F., Chen, P.J., Powell, C.J., Parks, D., McMichael, R.D., Judy, J.H., Martien, D., Berkowitz, A.E. and Daughton, J.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 517, 9 (1998).Google Scholar
12. Kools, J.C.S., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 2993 (1995).10.1063/1.359565Google Scholar
13. Murty, M.V.R., Cowles, B. and Cooper, B.H., Surf. Sci. 415, 328 (1998).10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00556-1Google Scholar
14. Kim, S.D., Lee, J.J., Lim, S.H. and Kim, H.J., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 5992 (1999).10.1063/1.370014Google Scholar
15. Mewes, T., Lopusnik, R., Fassbender, J., Hillebrands, B., Jung, M., Engel, D., Ehresmann, A. and Schmoranzer, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 1057 (2000).10.1063/1.125937Google Scholar
16. Becker, E.W., Bier, K. and Henkes, W., Zeitscrift for Physik 146, 133 (1956).Google Scholar
17. Yamada, I. and Matsuo, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 396, 149 (1996).10.1557/PROC-396-149Google Scholar
18. Fenner, D.B., Torti, R.P., Allen, L.P., Toyoda, N., Kirkpatrick, A.R., Greer, J.A., DiFilippo, V. and Hautala, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 585 (in press).Google Scholar