Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:49:42.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infrared Evaluation of Heat Generation During the Cyclic Deformation of a Cellular Al Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. Rabiei
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
J. W. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
A. G. Evans
Affiliation:
Materials Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540
Get access

Abstract

Heat generation from a notch during the compression-compression fatigue of a cellular Al alloy has been measured and compared with a model. The measurements indicate that heat is generated because of hysteresis occurring in narrow cyclic plastic zones outside the notch. This process continues until the notch closes. At closure, a brief period of heat generation arises because of friction along the notch faces. A plasticity model based on the Dugdale zone is shown to provide a reasonably accurate characterization of the heat generated, with the proviso that an “ineffective” zone be transposed onto the notch tip. It is found that the temperatures generated are too small to cause fatigue by thermal softening. A fatigue mechanism based on either geometric softening of the cells or crack growth in the cell walls is implied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Sugimura, Y., Rabiei, A., Evans, A.G., Material Science and Engineering A, 269, 38 (1999).Google Scholar
2.Harte, A., Fleck, N. A., and Ashby, M. F., Acta Mater., 47, 2511 (1999).Google Scholar
3.Flores, K. M. and Dauskardt, R. H., J. Mater. Res. 14, 638 (1999).Google Scholar
4.Zehner, A. T. and Rosakis, A. J., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 39, 385 (1991).Google Scholar
5.Suresh, S., Fatigue of Materials, Cambridge University Press (1991).Google Scholar
6.Riddell, M. N., Koo, G. P. and O'Toole, J. L., Polymer Engineering and Sciences, 6, 363 (1967).Google Scholar
7.Sugimura, Y., Meyer, J., He, M. Y., Bart-Smith, H., Grenestedt, J. and Evans, A. G., Acta Mater., 45, 5245 (1997).Google Scholar
8.Simone, A. and Gibson, L. A., Acta Mater., 46, 2139 (1998).Google Scholar
9.Evans, A. G., Hutchinson, J. W. and Ashby, M. F., Prog. Material Science, 43, 171 (1998).Google Scholar
10.Deshpande, V. S. and Fleck, N. A., submitted to J. Mech. Phys. Solids (1998).Google Scholar
11.Rice, J. R. in Fracture, Volume II (ed. Liebowitz, H.) Academic Press, New York, 191 (1968).Google Scholar
12.Tada, H., Paris, P. C. and Irwin, G. R., The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, to be published by ASME.Google Scholar
13.Ashby, M. F., Evans, A. G., Fleck, N. A., Gibson, L. J., Hutchinson, J. W., Wadley, H. G., Metal Foam Design Guide, Butterworth/Heineman, in Press.Google Scholar