Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:10:23.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Importance of adaptation and genotype × environment interactions in tropical beef breeding systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2012

H. M. Burrow
H. M. Burrow*
Affiliation:
Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies, UNE, Armidale NSW 2351, Australia
*
†E-mail: Heather.Burrow@une.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

This paper examines the relative importance of productive and adaptive traits in beef breeding systems based on Bos taurus and tropically adapted breeds across temperate and (sub)tropical environments. In the (sub)tropics, differences that exist between breeds in temperate environments are masked by the effects of environmental stressors. Hence in tropical environments, breeds are best categorised into breed types to compare their performance across environments. Because of the presence of environmental stressors, there are more sources of genetic variation in tropical breeding programmes. It is therefore necessary to examine the genetic basis of productive and adaptive traits for breeding programmes in those environments. This paper reviews the heritabilities and genetic relationships between economically important productive and adaptive traits relevant to (sub)tropical breeding programmes. It is concluded that it is possible to simultaneously genetically improve productive and adaptive traits in tropically adapted breeds of beef cattle grazed in tropical environments without serious detrimental consequences for either adaptation or production. However, breed-specific parameters are required for genetic evaluations. The paper also reviews the magnitude of genotype × environment (G × E) interactions impacting on production and adaptation of cattle, where ‘genotype’ is defined as breed (within a crossbreeding system), sire within breed (in a within-breed selection programme) or associations between economically important traits and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs – within a marker-assisted selection programme). It is concluded that re-ranking of breeds across environments is best managed by the use of the breed type(s) best suited to the particular production environment. Re-ranking of sires across environments is apparent in poorly adapted breed types across extreme tropical and temperate environments or where breeding animals are selected in a temperate environment for use in the (sub)tropics. However, G × E interactions are unlikely to be of major importance in tropically adapted beef cattle grazed in either temperate or (sub)tropical environments, although sex × environment interactions may provide new opportunities for differentially selecting to simultaneously improve steer performance in benign environments and female performance in harsher environments. Early evidence suggests that re-ranking of SNPs occurs across temperate and tropical environments, although their magnitude is still to be confirmed in well-designed experiments. The major limitation to genetic improvement of beef cattle over the next decade is likely to be a deficiency of large numbers of accurately recorded phenotypes for most productive and adaptive traits and, in particular, for difficult-to-measure adaptive traits such as resistance to disease and environmental stressors.

Keywords

beef cattleadaptationproductiongenotype × environment interactions
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Special Issue 5: Symposium “Sustainable animal production in the tropics” (SAPT), Guadeloupe, France, November 15–18, 2010 , May 2012 , pp. 729 - 740
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barwick, SA, Wolcott, ML, Johnston, DJ, Burrow, HM, Sullivan, MT 2009a. Genetics of steer daily and residual feed intake in two tropical beef genotypes and relationships among intake, body composition, growth and other post-weaning measures. Animal Production Science 49, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barwick, SA, Johnston, DJ, Burrow, HM, Holroyd, RG, Fordyce, G, Wolcott, ML, Sim, WD, Sullivan, MT 2009b. Genetics of heifer performance in ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ seasons and their relationships with steer performance in two tropical beef genotypes. Animal Production Science 49, 367–382.Google Scholar
Bradfield, MJ, Graser, H-U, Johnston, DJ 1997. Investigation of genotype × production environment interaction for weaning weight in the Santa Gertrudis breed in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 1–5.Google Scholar
Burns, WC, Koger, M, Butts, WT, Pahnish, OF, Blackwell, RL 1979. Genotype by environment interaction in Hereford cattle: II. Birth and weaning traits. Journal of Animal Science 49, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrow, HM 1997. Measurements of temperament and their relationships with performance traits of beef cattle. Animal Breeding Abstracts 65, 477–495.Google Scholar
Burrow, HM 2001. Variances and covariances between productive and adaptive traits and temperament in a composite breed of tropical beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 70, 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrow, HM 2006. Utilisation of diverse breed resources for tropical beef production. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, CD Rom, Communication No. 32-01, Organizing Committee WCGALP, Brazil, 8pp.Google Scholar
Burrow, HM, Dillon, RD 1997. Relationships between temperament and growth in a feedlot and commercial carcass traits of Bos indicus crossbreds. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 37, 407–411.Google Scholar
Burrow, HM, Prayaga, KC 2004. Correlated responses in productive and adaptive traits and temperament following selection for growth and heat resistance in tropical beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 86, 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrow, HM, Seifert, GW, Corbet, NJ 1988. A new technique for measuring temperament in cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 17, 154–157.Google Scholar
Burrow, HM, Seifert, GW, Hetzel, DJS 1991. Consequences of selection for weaning weight in Zebu, Bos taurus and Zebu × Bos taurus cattle in the tropics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrow, HM, Shorthose, WR, Stark, JL 1999. Relationships between temperament and carcass and meat quality attributes of tropical beef cattle. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 13, 227–230.Google Scholar
Burrow, HM, Moore, SS, Johnston, DJ, Barendse, W, Bindon, BM 2001. Quantitative and molecular genetic influences on properties of beef. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 893–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrow, HM, Johnston, DJ, Barwick, SA, Holroyd, RG, Barendse, W, Thompson, JM, Griffith, GR, Sullivan, M 2003. Relationships between carcass and beef quality and components of herd profitability in northern Australia. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 359–362.Google Scholar
Davis, GP 1993. Genetic parameters for tropical beef cattle in northern Australia: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Castro, JJ, Newson, RM 1993. Host resistance in cattle tick control. Parasitology Today 9, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Mattos, D, Bertrand, JK, Misztal, I 2000. Investigation of genotype × environment interactions for weaning weight for Herefords in three countries. Journal of Animal Science 78, 2121–2126.Google Scholar
Duarte-Ortuňo, A, Thorpe, W, Tewolde, A 1988. Reproductive performance of purebred and crossbred beef cattle in the tropics of Mexico. Animal Production 47, 11–20.Google Scholar
Frisch, JE 1981. Changes occurring in cattle as a consequence of selection for growth rate in a stressful environment. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 96, 23–38.Google Scholar
Frisch, JE, Vercoe, JE 1984. An analysis of growth of different cattle genotypes reared in different environments. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 103, 137–153.Google Scholar
Frisch, JE, O'Neill, CJ 1998. Comparative evaluation of beef cattle breeds of African, European and Indian origins. 2. Resistance to cattle ticks and gastrointestinal nematodes. Animal Science 67, 39–48.Google Scholar
Fry, JD, Nuzhdin, SV, Pasyukova, EG, Mackay, TFC 1998. QTL mapping of genotype–environment interaction for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research, Cambridge 71, 133–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, BJ, Bowman, PJ, Chamberlain, AJ, Savin, K, van Tassell, CP, Sonstegard, TS, Goddard, ME 2009. A validated genome wide association study to breed cattle adapted to an environment altered by climate change. PLoS One 4, e6676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibi, T, Hirooka, H, Kahi, AK, Sasae, Y, Sasaki, Y 2005. Genotype × environment interaction effects on carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle. Journal of Animal Science 83, 1503–1510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeyaruban, MG, Johnston, DJ, Graser, H-U 2009. Estimation of genotype × environment interactions for growth, fatness and reproductive traits in Australian Angus cattle. Animal Production Science 49, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, DJ, Reverter, A, Burrow, HM, Oddy, VH, Robinson, DL 2003a. Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of live, carcass and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 1. Live animal measures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 107–118.Google Scholar
Johnston, DJ, Reverter, A, Ferguson, DM, Thompson, JM, Burrow, HM 2003b. Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of live, carcass and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 3. Meat quality traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, DJ, Barwick, SA, Holroyd, RG, Fordyce, G, Burrow, HM 2006. Genetics of female reproduction traits. Proceedings of the Australian Beef – The Leader! Conference, March, pp. 47–52. Beef CRC, Armidale.Google Scholar
Johnston, DJ, Barwick, SA, Fordyce, G, Holroyd, RG 2010. Understanding the genetics of lactation anoestrus in Brahman beef cattle to enhance genetic evaluation of female reproductive traits. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Animal Production. CD-Rom, Communication No. 0923, Organizing Committee WCGALP, Leipzig, Germany, 4pp.Google Scholar
Johnston, DJ, Barwick, SA, Corbet, NJ, Fordyce, G, Holroyd, RG, Williams, PJ, Burrow, HM 2009. Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer and steer production traits. Animal Production Science 49, 399–412.Google Scholar
Kadel, MJ, Johnston, DJ, Burrow, HM, Graser, H-U, Ferguson, DM 2006. Genetics of flight time and other measures of temperament and their value as selection criteria for improving meat quality traits in tropically adapted breeds of beef cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 1029–1035.Google Scholar
Kloosterman, A, Parmentier, HK, Ploeger, HW 1992. Breeding cattle and sheep for resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes. Parasitology Today 8, 330–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koger, M, Burns, WC, Pahnish, OF, Butts, WT 1979. Genotype by environment interaction in Hereford cattle: I. Reproduction traits. Journal of Animal Science 49, 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koots, KR, Gibson, JP, Smith, C, Wilton, JW 1994. Analyses of published genetic parameter estimates for beef production traits. 1. Heritability. Animal Breeding Abstracts 62, 309–338.Google Scholar
Lillehammer, M, Hayes, BJ, Meuwissen, THE, Goddard, ME 2009. Gene by environment interactions for production traits in Australian dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 4008–4017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, N, Gianola, D, Rosa, GJM, Weigel, KA, Avendaño, S 2008. Marker-assisted assessment of genotype by environment interaction: a case study of single nucleotide polymorphism-mortality association in broilers in two hygiene environments. Journal of Animal Science 86, 3358–3366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackinnon, MJ, Meyer, K, Hetzel, DJS 1991. Genetic variation and covariation for growth, parasite resistance and heat tolerance in tropical cattle. Livestock Production Science 27, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minjauw, B, de Castro, JJ 2000. Host resistance to ticks and tick-borne diseases: its role in integrated control. In ‘Breeding for disease resistance in farm animals’, 2nd edition (ed. RFE Axford, SC Bishop, FW Nicholas and JB Owen). CAB International Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Montiel, F, Ahuja, C 2005. Body condition and suckling as factors influencing the duration of post partum anoestrus in cattle: a review. Animal Reproduction Science 85, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, N, Tallard, G 2007. Cattle and beef international commodity profile. Background paper for the Competitive Commercial Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa Study. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Murray, M, Stear, MJ, Trail, JCM, d'Ieteran, GD, Agyemang, K, Dwinger, RH 1991. Trypanosomiasis in cattle. Prospects for control. In ‘Breeding for disease resistance in farm animals’, 2nd edition (ed. RFE Axford, SC Bishop, FW Nicholas and JB Owen), pp. 203–223. CAB International Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Nephawe, KA, Neser, FWC, Roux, CZ, Theron, HE, van der Westhuizen, J, Erasmus, GJ 1999. Sire × ecological region interaction in Bonsmara cattle. South African Journal of Animal Science 29 (3), 189–201.Google Scholar
Neser, FWC, Konstantinov, KV, Erasmus, GJ 1996. The inclusion of herd–year–season by sire interaction in the estimation of genetic parameters in Bonsmara cattle. South African Journal of Animal Science 26, 75–78.Google Scholar
Neser, FWC, Erasmus, GJ, van Wyk, JB, Deventer, CS 1998. Quantifying herd–year–season × sire interaction in Bonsmara cattle. South African Journal of Animal Science 28, 167–172.Google Scholar
Pahnish, OF, Koger, M, Urick, JJ, Burns, WC, Butts, WT, Richardson, GV 1983. Genotype × environment interaction in Hereford cattle: III. Post-weaning traits of heifers. Journal of Animal Science 56, 1039–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahnish, OF, Urick, JJ, Burns, WC, Butts, WT, Koger, M, Blackwell, RL 1985. Journal of Animal Science 61, 1146–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, WJA, Hodges, J 1997. Tropical cattle: origins, breeds and breeding policies. Blackwell Science, Oxford, London.Google Scholar
Petherick, JC, Holroyd, RG, Doogan, VJ, Venus, BK 2002. Productivity, carcass and meat quality of lot-fed Bos indicus cross steers grouped according to temperament. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prayaga, KC, Barendse, W, Burrow, HM 2006. Genetics of tropical adaptation in northern Australian cattle. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, CD Rom, Communication No. 16-01, Organizing Committee WCGALP, Brazil, 8 pp.Google Scholar
Prayaga, KC, Corbet, NJ, Johnston, DJ, Wolcott, ML, Fordyce, G, Burrow, HM 2009. Genetic analyses of heifer adaptive traits and their relation to growth, pubertal and carcass traits in two tropical beef cattle genotypes. Animal Production Science 49, 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reverter, A, Johnston, DJ, Perry, D, Goddard, ME, Burrow, HM 2003a. Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of live, carcass and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 2. Abattoir carcass traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 119–134.Google Scholar
Reverter, A, Johnston, DJ, Ferguson, DM, Perry, D, Goddard, ME, Burrow, HM, Oddy, VH, Thompson, JM, Bindon, BM 2003b. Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of live, carcass and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 4. Correlations among live animal, carcass and meat quality traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, DL, Oddy, VH 2004. Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, fatness, muscle area and feeding behavior of feedlot finished beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 90, 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudder, TH, Seifert, GW, Burrow, HM 1985. Environmental and genotype effects on fertility in a commercial beef herd in Central Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 25, 489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudder, TH, Seifert, GW, Burrow, HM 1986. Liveweights to 18 months of progeny sired by commercially bred and randomly selected bulls. Conference of the Australian Society of Animal Production 16, 347–350.Google Scholar
Sorci, G, Moller, AP, Boulinier, T 1997. Genetics of host–parasite interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12, 196–200.Google Scholar
Stear, MJ, Murray, M 1994. Genetic resistance to parasitic disease: particularly of resistance in ruminants to gastrointestinal nematodes. Veterinary Parasitology 54, 161–176.Google Scholar
Stear, MJ, Bishop, SC, Mallard, BA, Raadsma, H 2001. The sustainability, feasibility and desirability of breeding livestock for disease resistance. Research in Veterinary Science 71, 1–7.Google Scholar
Stear, MJ, Hetzel, DJS, Brown, SC, Gershwin, LJ, Mackinnon, MJ, Nicholas, FW 1990. The relationships among ecto- and endoparasite levels, class I antigens of the bovine major histocompatibility system, immunoglobulin E levels and weight gain. Veterinary Parasitology 34, 303–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, J, Ayalew, W, Rege, JEO, Mulatu, W, Malmfors, B, Dessie, T, Philipsson, J 2009. Livestock keeper perceptions of four indigenous cattle breeds in tsetse infested areas of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 41, 1335–1346.Google Scholar
Thompson, JM, Polkinghorne, R, Anderson, CA, Webb, LE 2008 (eds) Meat standards Australia. A Special Edition of the Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48 (11), 129.Google Scholar
Turner, HG 1982. Genetic variation of rectal temperature in cows and its relationship to fertility. Animal Production 35, 401–412.Google Scholar
Turner, HG 1984. Variation in rectal temperature in a tropical environment and its relation to growth rate. Animal Production 38, 417–427.Google Scholar
Turner, HG, Short, AJ 1972. Effects of field infestations of gastrointestinal helminths and of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) on growth of three breeds of cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolcott, ML, Johnston, DJ, Barwick, SA, Iker, CL, Thompson, JM, Burrow, HM 2009. The genetics of meat quality and carcass traits in two tropical beef genotypes and the impact of tenderstretch on genetic and phenotypic tenderness. Animal Production Science 49, 383–398.Google Scholar
World Bank 2009. ‘Minding the stock: bringing public policy to bear on livestock sector development’ Report No. 44010-GLB. The World Bank, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Papers are available as open access manuscripts through CSIRO Publishing at http://www.publish.csiro.au/nid/17.htmGoogle Scholar
Papers are available as open access manuscripts through the Livestock Library at http://www.livestocklibrary.com.auGoogle Scholar