Book contents
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Vulnerable Islands and Coasts
- Part III Marine Fisheries and Pelagic Seas
- Part IV Changing Polar Seas
- Part V Institutions and Law for Ocean Governance
- Part VI Policies for Ocean Governance
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Part I - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Climate Change and Ocean Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Vulnerable Islands and Coasts
- Part III Marine Fisheries and Pelagic Seas
- Part IV Changing Polar Seas
- Part V Institutions and Law for Ocean Governance
- Part VI Policies for Ocean Governance
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Climate Change and Ocean GovernancePolitics and Policy for Threatened Seas, pp. 1 - 42Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Balaguru, K., Foltz, G. R., Leung, L. R., and Emanuel, K. A. (2016). Global warming-induced upper-ocean freshening and the intensification of super typhoons. Nature Communications, 7. Available at www.nature.com/articles/ncomms13670.Google Scholar
DeConto, R. M. and Pollard, D. (2016). Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise. Nature, 531, 591–7.Google Scholar
Delmas, M. A. and Young, O. R. (2009). Introduction: new perspectives on governance for sustainable development. In Delmas, M. A. and Young, O. R., eds., Governance for the Environment: New Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, L. (2018) Trump moves to open nearly all offshore waters to drilling. New York Times, 4 January. Available at www.nytimes.com/2018/01/04/climate/trump-offshore-drilling.html.Google Scholar
Harris, P. G. (2013). What’s Wrong with Climate Politics and How to Fix It, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Harris, P. G. (2018). Climate change: science, international cooperation and global environmental politics. In Kütting, Gabriela and Herman, Kyle, eds., Global Environmental Politics: Concepts, Theories and Case Studies, 2nd edn, London: Routledge, pp. 123–42.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Khatiwala, S., Tanhua, T., Fletcher, S. M., et al. (2013). Global ocean storage of anthropogenic carbon. Biogeosciences, 10, 2169–91.Google Scholar
Lange, R. and Marshall, D. (2017). Ecologically relevant levels of multiple, common marine stressors suggest antagonistic effects. Scientific Reports, 7. Available at www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-06373-y.Google Scholar
Langlais, C. E., Lenton, A., Heron, S. F., et al. (2017). Coral bleaching pathways under the control of regional temperature variability. Nature Climate Change, 7, 839–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (2012). Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: Past, Present, and Future, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. N. and Czempiel, E. O. (eds.) (1992). Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Storlazzi, C. D., Elias, E. P. L., and Berkowitz, P. (2015). Many atolls may be uninhabitable within decades due to climate change. Scientific Reports, 5. Available at www.nature.com/articles/srep14546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struzik, E. (2017). How a wayward Arctic current could cool the climate in Europe. Yale Environment 360, 11 December. Available at http://e360.yale.edu/features/how-a-wayward-arctic-current-could-cool-the-climate-in-europe.Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. (2016). How much longer can Antarctica’s hostile ocean delay global warming? Nature, 539, 346–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tynan, E. (2016). Ocean acidification: emergence from pre-industrial conditions. Nature Geoscience, 9(11), 804.Google Scholar
United Nations (2016). Paris Agreement. New York: United Nations. Available at http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2014). Emissions Gap Report 2014: A UNEP Synthesis Report, Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2016). Emissions Gap Report 2016: A UNEP Synthesis Report, Nairobi, UNEP.Google Scholar
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York: United Nations. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.Google Scholar
Wadhams, P. (2016). The global impacts of rapidly disappearing Arctic sea ice. Yale Environment 360, 26 September. Available at https://e360.yale.edu/features/as_arctic_ocean_ice_disappears_global_climate_impacts_intensify_wadhams.Google Scholar
Wijjfels, S., Roemmich, D., Monselesan, D., Church, J., and Gilson, J. (2016). Ocean temperatures chronical the ongoing warming of Earth. Nature Climate Change, 6, 116–8.Google Scholar
References
Anand, R. P. (1983). Origin and Development of the Law of the Sea: History of International Law Revisited. Publications on Ocean Development, v. 7. The Hague; Boston: Hingham, MA: Martinus Nijhoff; [distributed in the U.S. by] Kluwer Boston.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. S. and DeSombre, E. R. (2013). Saving Global Fisheries: Reducing Fishing Capacity to Promote Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beesley, A. (1983). The Negotiating Strategy of UNCLOS III: Developing and Developed Countries as Partners – A Pattern for Future Multilateral International Conferences? Law and Contemporary Problems, 46(2), 183–94.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2014). Earth System Governance: A Core Research Project of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change. Earth System Governance: World Politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L. K. (1990). International Environmental Policy: Emergence and Dimensions (Duke Press Policy Studies), 2nd edn. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Chasek, P. S., Downie, D. L. and Brown, J. W. (2014). Global Environmental Politics Dilemmas in World Politics, 6th edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, a member of the Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
Chircop, A. (2015). The International Maritime Organization. In Rothwell, D. R., Elferink, A. G. O., Scott, K. N., and Stephens, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 416–38.Google Scholar
Churchill, R. R. (2005). The Impact of State Practice on the Jurisdictional Framework Contained in the LOS Convention. In Oude Elferink, A. G. and Shirley, S. V., eds., Stability and Change in the Law of the Sea: The Role of the LOS Convention No. 24. Leiden; Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Churchill, R. R. (2017). The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. In Rothwell, D. R., Elferink, A. G. O., Scott, K. N., and Stephens, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 24–45.Google Scholar
Cullis-Suzuki, S. and Pauly, D. (2010). Failing the High Seas: A Global Evaluation of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations. Marine Policy, 34(5), 1036–42. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.03.002.Google Scholar
DeSombre, E. R. (2006). Global Environmental Institutions (Global Institutions Series). London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fulton, T. W. (1976). The Sovereignty of the Sea: An Historical Account of the Claims of England to the Dominion of the British Seas, and of the Evolution of the Territorial Waters, with Special Reference to the Rights of Fishing and the Naval Salute. Millwood, NY: Kraus Reprint Co.Google Scholar
Gilman, E., Passfield, K. and Nakamura, K. (2014). Performance of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations: Ecosystem-Based Governance of Bycatch and Discards. Fish and Fisheries, 15(2), 327–51. doi: 10.1111/faf.12021.Google Scholar
Gjerde, K. M., Currie, D., Wowk, K. and Sack, K. (2013). Ocean in Peril: Reforming the Management of Global Ocean Living Resources in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 74(2), 540–51.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. (2011). Making the Law of the Sea: A Study in the Development of International Law. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollick, A. L. (1981). U.S. Foreign Policy and the Law of the Sea. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hong, G. H. and Lee, Y. J. (2015). Transitional Measures to Combine Two Global Ocean Dumping Treaties into a Single Treaty. Marine Policy, 55, 47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.007.Google Scholar
Kalland, A. and Moeran, B. (1992). Japanese Whaling: End of an Era? Scandinavian Institute for Asian Studies Monograph Series 61. London: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Karim, M. S. (2010). Implementation of the MARPOL Convention in Developing Countries. Nordic Journal of International Law, 79(2), 303–37. doi: 10.1163/157181010X12668401899110.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. A. (2015). Science and the International Regulation of Marine Pollution. In Rothwell, D. R., Elferink, A. G. O., Scott, K. N., and Stephens, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 516–35.Google Scholar
Mansell, J. N. K. (2009). Flag State Responsibility: Historical Development and Contemporary Issues. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. (1993). Intentional Oil Pollution of the Oceans. In Haas, P. M., Keohane, R. O. and Levy, M. A., eds., Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection (Global Environmental Accords Series). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miyaoka, I. (2013). Legitimacy in International Society: Japan’s Reaction to Global Wildlife Preservation. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Molenaar, E. J. (2011). Non-Participation in the Fish Stocks Agreement: Status and Reasons. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 26(2), 195–234. doi: 10.1163/157180811X558956.Google Scholar
Noyes, J. E. (2017). The Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone. In Rothwell, D. R., Elferink, A.G.O., Scott, K. N., and Stephens, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 91–113.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. J. (1992). Whalers, Cetologists, Environmentalists, and the International Management of Whales. International Organization, 46(1), 147–86.Google Scholar
Rayfuse, R. (2015). Regional Fisheries Management Organizations. In Rothwell, D. R., Elferink, A.G.O., Scott, K. N., and Stephens, T., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 439–62.Google Scholar
Scott, S. V. (2005). The LOS Convention as a Constitutional Regime for the Oceans. In Oude Elferink, A. G. and Shirley, S. V., eds., Stability and Change in the Law of the Sea: The Role of the LOS Convention No. 24. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Stoett, P. J. (1997). Cetapolitics: The IWC, Foreign Policies, and NGOs. In The International Politics of Whaling. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. E. (1994). Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vogler, J. (2000). The Global Commons: Environmental and Technological Governance. 2nd edn. Chichester, West Sussex, England; New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wonham, J. (1996). Some Recent Regulatory Developments in IMO for Which There Are Corresponding Requirements in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. A Challenge to Be Met by the States Parties? Marine Policy, 20(5), 377–88. doi: 10.1016/0308-597X(96)00030-9.Google Scholar