Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:56:47.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The metabolism of “surplus” amino acids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2012

David A. Bender*
Affiliation:
Division of Biosciences and Division of Medical Education, University College London, Gower St, LondonWC1E 6BT, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Prof. D. A. Bender, email d.bender@ucl.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For an adult in N balance, apart from small amounts of amino acids required for the synthesis of neurotransmitters, hormones, etc, an amount of amino acids almost equal to that absorbed from the diet can be considered to be “surplus” in that it will be catabolized. The higher diet-induced thermogenesis from protein than from carbohydrate or fat has generally been assumed to be due to increased protein synthesis, which is ATP expensive. To this must be added the ATP cost of protein catabolism through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Amino acid catabolism will add to thermogenesis. Deamination results in net ATP formation except when serine and threonine deaminases are used, but there is the energy cost of synthesizing glutamine in extra-hepatic tissues. The synthesis of urea has a net cost of only 1·5 × ATP when the ATP yield from fumarate metabolism is offset against the ATP cost of the urea cycle, but this offset is thermogenic. In fasting and on a low carbohydrate diet as much of the amino acid carbon as possible will be used for gluconeogenesis – an ATP-expensive, and hence thermogenic, process. Complete oxidation of most amino acid carbon skeletons also involves a number of thermogenic steps in which ATP (or GTP) or reduced coenzymes are utilized. There are no such thermogenic steps in the metabolism of pyruvate, acetyl CoA or acetoacetate, but for amino acids that are metabolized by way of the citric acid cycle intermediates there is thermogenesis ranging from 1 up to 7 × ATP equivalent per mol.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2012

Introduction

For an adult in N balance there will be an amount of amino acids to be catabolized equal to the dietary intake of protein, less faecal losses of undigested dietary protein, undigested endogenous proteins (including mucin in gastro-intestinal mucus, remnants of digestive enzymes and shed mucosal cells) and bacterial proteins. It is only in growth, pregnancy and recovery from tissue protein losses that there is a net increase in whole body protein, and even for someone in positive N balance there will be a considerable amount of amino acids to be catabolized because they are “surplus” to requirements for net protein synthesis.

It is well established that the diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT) associated with protein is considerably higher than that associated with carbohydrate or fat. Some 20–30 % of the energy consumed as protein is dissipated in DIT, compared with 5–10 % of that from carbohydrate and 0–3 % of that from fat(Reference Tappy1, Reference Jequier2). Allowing for this thermic effect of protein suggests that the net metabolizable energy of protein is nearer 13 kJ/g than the Atwater factor of 17 kJ/g.(Reference Westerterp-Plantenga3)

The thermic response to a high protein meal or diet (in longer-term studies) has been reported in many studies, some using liquid meals or diets and others meals or diets comprising normal foods, but designed to give different proportions of the macronutrients. Many such studies have used extreme proportions of protein, fat and carbohydrate. For example, Crovetti et al. (Reference Crovetti, Porrini and Santangelo4) fed three different isocaloric meals of ordinary foods to normal body weight women and measured heat output by indirect calorimetry over 7 hours. The meal providing 68 % of energy from protein gave an increase in energy output of 261 kJ, compared with 69 % carbohydrate at 92 kJ and 70 % fat at 97 kJ. Dauncey & Bingham(Reference Dauncey and Bingham5) fed diets providing 37 % protein or 3 % protein (replaced by sugars) and 48 % fat, and measured total energy expenditure over 24 h in a respiratory chamber. The high protein diet led to a 12 % increase in total energy expenditure, and significantly higher energy expenditure both in exercise and in sleeping. Each meal in this study was followed by a period of exercise, so it is difficult to disentangle the effects of feeding from those of exercise. Lejeune et al. (Reference Lejeune, Westerterp and Adam6) demonstrated higher DIT, sleeping metabolic rate and activity-induced energy expenditure in subjects fed a high protein diet (30 % energy from protein, 40 % from carbohydrate and 30 % from fat) than one providing an adequate intake of protein (10 % energy from protein, 60 % from carbohydrate and 30 % from fat). The increased thermogenesis associated with a high protein diet has been exploited in slimming regimens because of the need for increased fat metabolism to fuel the thermogenesis(Reference Westerterp-Plantenga3, Reference Halton and Hu7Reference Westerterp-Plantenga, Rolland and Wilson10).

More than half of all patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia experience some degree of hypothermia, defined as a core body temperature below 35°C. This can lead to cardiovascular and respiratory problems, impaired blood coagulation, and increased recovery time. Anaesthesia impairs central thermoregulation and lowers the threshold for vasoconstriction, so redistributing blood (and hence heat) to the periphery. At the same time, fluids are infused at room temperature rather than body temperature, and muscle relaxants inhibit shivering.(11) The thermic effect of protein has been exploited to prevent post-operative hypothermia. Intravenous infusion of an amino acid mixture begun an hour before anaesthesia and continued throughout the period of surgery resulted in maintenance of rectal temperature at 37·14°C, while in patients receiving the same volume of saline, rectal temperature fell to 35·98°C(Reference Sellden, Branstrom and Brundin12). The amino acid infusion was associated with increased pulmonary oxygen uptake. In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, infusion of an amino acid mixture for 2 hours from the start of surgery attenuated the fall in core body temperature (measured in the pulmonary artery) seen in patients receiving saline infusion, and led to a modest but significant progressive increase in body temperature during the remaining 4–6 hours(Reference Moriyama, Tsuneyoshi and Omae13). Brundin and Wahren(Reference Brundin and Wahren14) studied the effects of amino acid infusion in healthy volunteers; again there was an increase in body temperature by 0·25°C and energy expenditure (as determined by oxygen consumption). Half the increased oxygen consumption was by splanchnic tissues rather than muscle. In rats fed a high protein diet the concentrations of most amino acids reaching the periphery are lower than on a normal protein intake, reflecting the splanchnic extraction of amino acids, either for gluconeogenesis or catabolism.(Reference Morens, Gaudichon and Fromentin15)

A number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain this thermic effect of protein: increased protein turnover, the energy cost of urea synthesis and gluconeogenesis from amino acids, and the relative inefficiency of the catabolism of amino acid carbon skeletons, as well as increased non-shivering thermogenesis as a result of increased activity of thermogenin.

Increased protein turnover

Protein synthesis is energy expensive. An adult human being synthesizes some 5·7 g of protein/kg body weight/day, accounting for 18·8 % of fasting metabolic rate or 12·9 % of total energy expenditure(Reference Waterlow, Garlick and Millward16). For each amino acid incorporated in ribosomal protein synthesis there is a cost of 2 × ATP equivalents to form aminoacyl tRNA (because the reaction yields AMP and pyrophosphate), plus 1 × GTP (equivalent to ATP) and 1 × ATP to move the growing peptide chain from the A site of the ribosome to the P site. This is a minimal cost of 4 × ATP per amino acid incorporated or some 2·8 kJ per gram of protein synthesized. To this can be added the cost of active transport of amino acids into cells (an additional 0·8 kJ/gram) and synthesizing mRNA (an additional 0·6 kJ/g), giving a cost of some 4·2 kJ/g of protein synthesized, or 20 % of BMR(Reference Robinson, Jaccard and Persaud17). Further costs of protein turnover include: (a) the relatively small cost of the action of the proof-reading site on aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, hydrolysing aminoacyl tRNA when the wrong amino acid has been incorporated, followed by re-esterification of the correct amino acid; (b) the ATP cost of ensuring correct folding of newly synthesized proteins by active chaperone proteins; (c) the energy cost of catabolizing incorrectly folded proteins, followed by resynthesis. This last will not be measured as protein turnover by conventional methods since incorrectly folded proteins are rapidly catabolized intracellularly.

Targeted protein catabolism via the ubiquitin-proteasome system is also ATP expensive, although the random hydrolysis of tissue proteins by lysosomes is not. Ubiquitin is a small (78 amino acid) protein that targets tissue proteins for uptake by the proteasome; it is not itself catabolized in the proteasome, but is recycled. However, there is apparently random mono-ubiquitination of proteins in the cell, followed by more specific attachment of three or four additional molecules of ubiquitin to those already present, catalysed by one of more than 600 ubiquitin ligases in the human genome. Each molecule of ubiquitin added involves an ATP cost(Reference Deshaies and Joazeiro18, Reference Reyes-Turcu, Ventii and Wilkinson19). The proteasome is a large multi-enzyme complex that involves ATP-dependent de-ubiquitination of target proteins and ATP-dependent unfolding of the proteins to permit access by the proteases in the core of the proteasome. There are at least 6 × ATPases involved in the proteasome(Reference Finley20).

Robinson et al. (Reference Robinson, Jaccard and Persaud17) measured energy expenditure and whole body protein turnover for 9 hours in a group of men fed hourly with flavoured water (i.e. fasting) or iso-energetic liquid diets providing either 70 % carbohydrate or 70 % protein and 15 % fat. Compared with the fasting state, the high carbohydrate diet raised resting metabolic rate (RMR) by 5·7 % (accounting for 5·7 % of the energy intake) and the high protein diet by 23·5 % (accounting for 9·6 % of the energy intake). In the fasting state, protein synthesis was 87·2 g over 9 hours, with catabolism of 110·2 g, giving N balance = − 23 g; feeding the high carbohydrate diet gave protein synthesis of 131·2 g, catabolism 109·8 g, and N balance = +21·4 g; feeding the high protein diet gave protein synthesis of 243·9 g, catabolism 78·9 g and N balance = +165 g. Based on a cost of 4·2 kJ/g protein synthesized, they calculated that the cost of protein synthesis was 8·7 % of total energy expenditure (TEE) in fasting, 11·7 % of TEE after the high carbohydrate meals and 19·8 % of TEE after the high protein meals. After the high carbohydrate meals, protein synthesis accounted for 36 % of the increased energy expenditure (with the remainder presumably the cost of glycogen synthesis); after the high protein meals, protein synthesis accounted for 68 % of the increased energy expenditure. Since the high protein diet provided only 15 % of energy from carbohydrate, is it likely that gluconeogenesis from amino acids accounted for a significant proportion of the increased energy expenditure. The decreased protein catabolism in response to feeding the high protein meals is in accordance with the observations of Garlick et al. (Reference Garlick, McNurlan and Patlak21) that the immediate response to feeding a high protein meal is a reduction in tissue protein catabolism, followed by a longer term adaptive response with increased synthesis and catabolism.

Hochstenbach-Waelen et al. (Reference Hochstenbach-Waelen, Veldhorst and Nieuwenhuizen22) fed subjects on iso-energetic diets providing 10 or 25 % protein, 35 or 20 % fat and 55 % carbohydrate for 3 days, in a randomized crossover experiment, before they were placed in a respiration chamber for 36 h. Twenty four hour TEE was 2·5 % higher, and the sleeping metabolic rate 4 % higher, on the high protein diet. At 10 % of energy from protein (casein) the subjects were unable to maintain N balance, but they were in positive N balance on the high protein diet. The high protein diet also led to negative fat balance.

Obviously, the positive N balance seen on feeding a high protein diet cannot continue; there must be adaptation of protein catabolism to match increased protein synthesis. Greig et al. (Reference Greig, Elwyn and Askanazi23) maintained septic patients on total parenteral nutrition at 1·35 × their RMR and either 191 or 366 mg N/kg body weight/day. At the higher protein intake there was the expected increase in protein oxidation and oxygen consumption, and for the first 3 days the patients were in positive N balance. However, by days 5–6 the patients were back in N equilibrium. They also showed higher resting energy expenditure than those on the lower N intake.

Garlick et al. (Reference Garlick, McNurlan and Patlak21) noted that in response to a high protein diet there is initially positive N balance, followed by an increased amplitude of cycling between protein synthesis in the fed state and protein catabolism in the fasting state, and suggested that amino acid oxidation accounts for up to 57 % of TEE, compared with 21 % on a high carbohydrate diet. However, only about half of the amino acids from a high protein diet were oxidized in their study. Price et al. (Reference Price, Halliday and Pacy24) similarly showed greater fasting N losses in fasting and gains in the fed state in subjects adapted for 12 days to diets providing 0·36, 0·77, 1·59 or 2·31 g protein /kg body weight, with overall negative N balance at the two lower levels of intake and overall positive N balance at the two higher levels. Harber et al. (Reference Harber, Schenk and Barkan25) fed subjects a typical western diet (60 % carbohydrate, 30 % fat and 10 % protein) for two days, then an iso-energetic low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet for 7 days (5 % carbohydrate, 60 % fat, 35 % protein). They reported an increase in muscle protein fractional synthetic rate, but also an increase in whole body proteolysis as determined by the leucine reappearance rate.

Pannemans et al. (Reference Pannemans, Halliday and Westerterp26, Reference Pannemans, Halliday and Westerterp27) fed young and elderly people diets providing 12 % or 21 % of energy from protein (at the expense of fat, with 46 % of energy from carbohydrate) and measured N balance and protein turnover after adaptation to the diets for 3 weeks. The higher protein intake had no effect on N balance, which remained at zero, in the elderly subjects, but young adults showed positive N balance at the higher protein intake. Both protein synthesis and catabolism increased on feeding the high protein diet.

Millward & Rivers(Reference Millward and Rivers28) proposed, initially on theoretical grounds, then confirmed by experimental data(Reference Millward29, Reference Millward30) that there is (relatively slow) adaptation of amino acid catabolism in response to changes in protein intake. With increasing protein intake there is increased oxidation of dietary essential amino acids (especially the sulphur and branched chain amino acids and tryptophan) in both the fed and fasting states. In the fed state this is to remove (potentially toxic) amino acids that are present in excess of requirements for protein synthesis, but the catabolism continues in the fasting state because the key enzymes of amino acid catabolism have relatively long half-lives. This slow adaptation means that experimentally determined protein requirements will depend to a considerable extent on habitual protein intake. Even a period of 10–12 days may not be long enough to permit adaptation to a new level of protein intake.

The energy cost of urea synthesis

Examination of the urea synthesis cycle (Fig. 1) would suggest an energy cost of 4 × ATP equivalents per mol of urea synthesized – the figure that is commonly quoted in textbooks. However, the fumarate that is released by the action of argininosuccinase is recycled back to oxaloacetate via reactions of the citric acid cycle, including malate dehydrogenase, then transaminated to aspartate that is used in the reaction catalysed by argininosuccinate synthetase. The reaction of malate dehydrogenase leads to reduction of NAD+ to NADH, which, in the mitochondrial electron transport chain yields approximately 2·5 × ATP. This means that the net cost of the urea cycle per se is 1·5 × ATP, but there is thermogenesis from the synthesis and utilization of 2·5 × ATP.

Fig. 1 The urea synthesis cycle and metabolism of fumarate to yield aspartate.

There are four possible routes for the production of ammonia from amino acids:

  1. (1) Glycine and l-amino acid oxidases catalyse a flavin-dependent reaction, and the resultant FADH2 is re-oxidized in the mitochondrial electron transport chain with a yield of approximately 1·5 × ATP. Many amino acids undergo transamination linked to pyruvate as the amino acceptor, followed by transamination of the resultant alanine using glyoxylate as the amino acceptor, and oxidative deamination of the resultant glycine. The relative importance of this pathway is seen in primary hyperoxaluria (type I), where genetic defects of alanine-glyoxylate transaminase lead to massive accumulation of oxalate formed from glyoxylate.(Reference Danpure31)

  2. (2) Transamination linked to 2-oxoglutarate as the amino acceptor yields glutamate. Glutamate dehydrogenase catalyses an NAD+ dependent reaction, and the resultant NADH is re-oxidized in the mitochondrial electron transport chain with a yield of approximately 2·5 × ATP.

  3. (3) Transamination linked to oxaloacetate yields aspartate, which may either be used for synthesis of argininosuccinate and hence directly for urea synthesis (see Fig. 1), or for synthesis of AMP from IMP. As shown in Fig. 2, this reaction proceeds via the intermediate formation of adenylosuccinate at the expense of GTP (equivalent to − 1 × ATP). However, the cleavage of adenylosuccinate to IMP releases fumarate, which is, as in urea synthesis, recycled back to aspartate, yielding 1 × NADH, which is equivalent to 2·5 × ATP. There is thus a net yield of 1·5 × ATP when aspartate is the substrate for ammonia formation by this pathway. Again there is thermogenesis from the utilization of GTP. This adenine nucleotide cycle is especially important in deamination of amino acids in muscle, and in general tissues that have a high activity of glutamate dehydrogenase have a low activity of adenosine deaminase, and vice versa.(Reference Lowenstein32)

  4. (4) Serine and threonine deaminases catalyse pyridoxal phosphate-dependent deamination with no reduction of any coenzymes, and hence no energy considerations.

Fig. 2 Adenosine deaminase and the purine nucleotide cycle for ammoniagenesis from amino acids.

This means that the synthesis of urea is thermogenic, with the utilization of 4 × ATP that must be provided, but in most cases it is either ATP neutral or actually proceeds with a gain of ATP. When amino acids are deaminated by transamination linked to glyoxylate, followed by the action of glycine oxidase there is a yield of 1·5 × ATP per N, and the synthesis of urea is overall energetically neutral. When amino acids are transaminatively linked to 2-oxoglutarate or oxaloacetate, followed by the action of glutamate dehydrogenase (the urea synthesis cycle or the adenine nucleotide cycle), there is a yield of 2·5 × ATP, and hence the synthesis of urea proceeds with a net yield of +1 × ATP.

Ammonium that is formed in extra-hepatic tissues is transported to the liver as glutamine. There is a cost of 1 × ATP for each mol of glutamine synthesized, which will cancel out the ATP gain from ammoniagenesis via aspartate or glutamate. There is no yield of ATP when glutamine is hydrolysed by glutaminase to yield glutamate and ammonium. Ammonium is released from glutamine in the periportal cells of the liver, but then glutamine is synthesized in the perivenous cells to minimize the amount of ammonium entering the circulation. It is difficult to quantify the magnitude and energy cost of this catabolism and resynthesis of glutamine in the liver.

As much as 20–25 % of the urea synthesized daily is either secreted into the small intestine in bile and pancreatic juice or diffuses across the intestinal wall, and is hydrolysed by intestinal bacteria. Some of the resultant ammonium is used for bacterial amino acid and protein synthesis, and some of these bacterial amino acids are absorbed, so that only about 10 % of the nitrogen is lost in faeces. Most of the ammonium is absorbed and used in enterocytes or the liver for synthesis of urea (about 25 % of the ammonium released by intestinal bacteria), or, via glutamate dehydrogenase, synthesis of amino acids.(Reference Long, Jeevanandam and Kinney33Reference Bergen and Wu35) Bacterial synthesis of amino acids will contribute to thermogenesis; resynthesis of urea will have a net cost of 1·5 × ATP (with no offset from the formation of ammonium) and thermogenesis from the synthesis and utilization of 2·5 × ATP. Reductive amination of 2-oxoglutarate to glutamate will have a cost of − 2·5 × ATP.

Gluconeogenesis and fatty acid synthesis from amino acids

There is a clear need for gluconeogenesis from amino acid carbon skeletons in the fasting state, and also when a high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet is fed. Feeding rats a high protein diet (60 % by weight) leads to depletion of glucogenic amino acids in blood, muscle and liver; switching to a low protein diet (7·5 % by weight) leads to accumulation of glucogenic amino acids. The response of alanine and glutamine is rapid, but that of threonine, serine and glycine is slower (7–11 days), reflecting the relatively long half-lives of the regulatory enzymes involved in their catabolism.(Reference Moundras, Remesy and Demigne36) Much of the gluconeogenesis from amino acids in rats fed a high protein diet is used to increase liver glycogen rather than being released into the circulation as free glucose; phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase activity is increased, but glucose 6-phosphatase activity is reduced.(Reference Azzout-Marniche, Gaudichon and Blouet37)

Bohé et al. (Reference Bohe, Low and Wolfe38) found an immediate 19 % increase in plasma glucose when control subjects were infused with an amino acid mixture, and plasma glucose remained elevated throughout the 9 hours of the infusion. Veldhorst et al. (Reference Veldhorst, Westerterp-Plantenga and Westerterp39) demonstrated increased gluconeogenesis in subjects fed a high-protein carbohydrate-free diet compared with a normal diet, and calculated that 42 % of the increased energy expenditure after the high-protein diet was due to gluconeogenesis, and that the ATP cost of gluconeogenesis was 33 % of the ATP yield of glucose.

As shown in Fig. 3, for those amino acids that give rise to citric acid cycle intermediates (see Table 1), the cost of synthesizing glucose is 6 × ATP equivalents per mol of glucose formed. The NADH needed in the cytosol for gluconeogenesis comes from the indirect export of oxaloacetate from the mitochondrion. In the mitochondrion oxaloacetate is reduced to malate, which is exported and oxidized to oxaloacetate in the cytosol. This formation and utilization of NADH can be considered to add 2·5 × ATP equivalents to thermogenesis. For those amino acids that give rise to pyruvate there is an additional 1 × ATP per mol of pyruvate (2 × ATP per mol of glucose formed) for the carboxylation of pyruvate to oxaloacetate.

Fig. 3 Thermogenic steps in the oxidation of amino acid carbon skeletons that contribute citric acid cycle intermediates.

Table 1 Metabolic fates of the carbon skeletons of amino acids

In the fed state, if the resultant glucose 6-phosphate is isomerized to glucose 1-phosphate and used for glycogen synthesis in the liver there is an additional requirement of 1 × UTP (equivalent to ATP) per mol. If glucose is released from the liver and used for glycogen synthesis in muscle then there is an additional requirement of 2 × ATP equivalents per mol of glucose incorporated.

If the carbon skeletons of amino acids other than those that yield pyruvate, acetyl CoA or acetoacetate are to be used for fatty acid synthesis then again there is the GTP cost of synthesizing phosphoenolpyruvate and then pyruvate from oxaloacetate to be subtracted from the ATP yield of the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate to acetyl CoA.

The efficiency of amino acid catabolism

The citric acid cycle is generally considered to provide a pathway for the complete oxidation of amino acid carbon skeletons. This is clearly so for amino acids that yield pyruvate, acetyl CoA or acetoacetate (Table 1). However, for amino acids that provide intermediates of the citric acid cycle, the cycle does not, per se, permit complete oxidation because increasing the amount of any one of the intermediates of the cycle will, unless intermediates are withdrawn for synthesis of other metabolites, result in an increase in the amount of oxaloacetate over and above that which is required to maintain cycle activity.

For complete oxidation, this excess oxaloacetate must be reduced to malate, exported from the mitochondrion into the cytosol, oxidized to oxaloacetate and then undergo phosphorylation (at the expense of GTP) and decarboxylation to phosphoenolpyruvate, followed by the pyruvate kinase reaction to yield pyruvate and ATP. This sequence of reactions is therefore thermogenic, with consumption of GTP and formation of ATP.

As discussed above, when the malate exported from the mitochondrion is used for gluconeogenesis, the NADH formed in the oxidation of malate to oxaloacetate is used for the reduction of bisphosphoglycerate. If the oxaloacetate is used for synthesis of pyruvate to re-enter the mitochondrion for complete oxidation then the cytosolic NADH is not used. The malate-aspartate shuttle to transfer reducing equivalents from the cytosol into the mitochondrion obviously cannot be used, since it depends on reduction of oxaloacetate to malate in the cytosol and transport of malate into the mitochondrion for re-oxidation – the reverse of the sequence of reactions involved in transporting oxaloacetate out of the mitochondrion for pyruvate synthesis. Therefore the glycerophosphate shuttle must be used. This involves cytosolic reduction of dihydroxyacetone phosphate to glycerol 3-phosphate at the expense of NADH, with mitochondrial oxidation back to dihydroxyacetone phosphate at the expense of FAD being reduced. This involves a net loss of 1 × ATP equivalent, since NADH yields 2·5 × ATP in the mitochondrial electron transport chain, while reduced flavins yield only 1·5 × ATP.

Tracing the pathways for catabolism and complete oxidation to carbon dioxide and water of the carbon skeletons of the amino acids permits calculation of the total ATP yield. A number of authors(Reference Livesey40Reference Birkett and de Lange43) have performed such calculations in order to calculate the energy yield of protein to achieve more accurate figures than the generally used Atwater factor of 17 kJ/g. Table 2 shows a recalculation of the total ATP yield and the ATP (or reduced coenzyme) cost of amino acid catabolism (as appropriate with different values for alternative pathways), assuming that reduced nicotinamide nucleotide coenzymes are equivalent to 2·5 × ATP and reduced flavins to 1·5 × ATP.(Reference Hinkle44)

Table 2 ATP yield and thermogenesis from amino acid carbon skeleton oxidation

The difference between the total ATP yield and the ATP plus reduced coenzyme requirement for catabolism is the net yield of ATP per mol of amino acid catabolized. The ATP- or NAD(P)H-utilizing steps can be considered as contributing to thermogenesis, and hence the thermic effect of protein. The consumption of ATP or reduced coenzymes can be considered to be equivalent to “unproductive” or wasteful thermogenesis. There is no such unproductive thermogenesis for alanine, cysteine, serine (or glycine metabolized via glyoxylate), threonine and tryptophan. For most other amino acids there is unproductive thermogenesis of 1 or 2 × ATP; catabolism of lysine metabolized by way of saccharopine and of tyrosine involves 4·5 × ATP equivalents of thermogenesis and catabolism of phenylalanine 7 × ATP equivalents.

Uncoupling of mitochondrial electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation

Petzke et al. (Reference Petzke, Friedrich and Metges45) fed rats ad libitum on three levels of protein: 13·8 % by weight of the diet (appropriate for rats), 25·7 % or 51·3 %. The animals on the highest protein intake had a higher food consumption than those on the appropriate or intermediate protein intake. Animals fed both the higher protein intakes gained less weight over 8 weeks, had smaller epididymal fat pads and had a lower gain in body weight/MJ consumed. They attributed this to increased expression of uncoupling protein (UCP) mRNA in liver (at the intermediate protein intake, with no further increase at the highest protein intake) and brown adipose tissue (increased at the highest protein intake but not the intermediate level). The authors noted that increased mRNA might or might not translate into increased uncoupling protein synthesis. However, Hurtaud et al. (Reference Hurtaud, Gelly and Chen46) showed that physiological concentrations of glutamine specifically increase translation of uncoupling protein mRNA in isolated colonocytes, macrophages (both of which utilize glutamine as a major metabolic fuel) and pancreatic β-islet cells (which do not), despite a modest fall in mRNA. The effect was specific for glutamine, with no other amino acid leading to increased UCP synthesis (phenylalanine alone led to reduced UCP synthesis) and no other amino acid having a significant synergistic effect when added together with glutamine.

Rats fed a high protein diet have less interscapular brown adipose tissue than those fed a lower protein intake whether they are maintained at 22°C or 6°C.(Reference Harri and Brockway47). This may explain the increased expression of uncoupling proteins in response to a high protein diet(Reference Danpure31, Reference Lowenstein32) – an attempt to maintain thermogenesis with less brown adipose tissue. There is no reason why it should be desirable for protein oxidation to be less energetically efficient than oxidation of fat or carbohydrate. Stock(Reference Stock48) has suggested that DIT, presumably as a result of uncoupling rather than the ATP requirements of metabolic pathways, evolved as a mechanism to deal with nutrient-deficient or unbalanced diets and that the role of DIT in the regulation of energy balance is secondary to its function in regulating the metabolic supply of essential nutrients.

One possible role of UCP is in regulation of fatty acid metabolism. Transport of fatty acids into the mitochondrion is regulated by the carnitine acyltransferases at the outer and inner faces of the mitochondrial membranes, and the fact that the acyl carnitine transporter will only carry acyl carnitine into the mitochondrion in exchange for free carnitine being exported.(Reference Kerner and Hoppel49, Reference Eaton50) However, free fatty acids may also enter the mitochondrion by dissolving in the lipid membrane and flipping across, bypassing the regulated system. It has been suggested that the role of UCP is to transport these free fatty acids, present in amounts in excess of requirements for oxidation, back across the mitochondrial membrane. This involves proton flux across the membrane, and hence effectively partially uncouples electron transport from ADP phosphorylation. This will be thermogenic since there is now oxidation of metabolic fuels to provide protons that are not used to drive ATP synthesis.

It is probably impossible to quantify uncoupling in vivo. It is possible to measure carbon and nitrogen fluxes, oxygen consumption and heat output, but not turnover of ATP in the whole body, although this is possible with isolated cells and perfused organs using 31P nuclear magnetic resonance.(Reference Gadian and Radda51)

Conclusions

While much of the thermogenesis associated with protein intake can be attributed to increased protein synthesis and catabolism (both of which are ATP expensive), ammoniagenesis offsets the ATP cost of urea synthesis, but results in thermogenesis. Gluconeogenesis from amino acid carbon skeletons is ATP expensive, and oxidation of most amino acid carbon skeletons involves consumption of ATP and reduced coenzymes, so adding to thermogenesis.

Acknowledgements

No conflicts of interest declared. This work received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The author's conference fees and travel expenses were paid by the conference organisers.

References

1Tappy, L (1996) Thermic effect of food and sympathetic nervous system activity in humans. Reprod Nutr Dev 36, 391397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Jequier, E (2002) Pathways to obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26, Suppl. 2, S12S17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Westerterp-Plantenga, MS (2008) Protein intake and energy balance. Regul Pept 149, 6769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Crovetti, R, Porrini, M, Santangelo, A, et al. (1998) The influence of thermic effect of food on satiety. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 482488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Dauncey, MJ & Bingham, SA (1983) Dependence of 24 h energy expenditure in man on the composition of the nutrient intake. Br J Nutr 50, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Lejeune, MP, Westerterp, KR, Adam, TC, et al. (2006) Ghrelin and glucagon-like peptide 1 concentrations, 24-h satiety, and energy and substrate metabolism during a high-protein diet and measured in a respiration chamber. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 8994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Halton, TL & Hu, FB (2004) The effects of high protein diets on thermogenesis, satiety and weight loss: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr 23, 373385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Hu, FB (2005) Protein, body weight, and cardiovascular health. Am J Clin Nutr 82, Suppl. 1, 242S247S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Eisenstein, J, Roberts, SB, Dallal, G, et al. (2002) High-protein weight-loss diets: are they safe and do they work? A review of the experimental and epidemiologic data. Nutr Rev 60, (7 Pt 1), 189200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Westerterp-Plantenga, MS, Rolland, V, Wilson, SA, et al. (1999) Satiety related to 24 h diet-induced thermogenesis during high protein/carbohydrate vs high fat diets measured in a respiration chamber. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 495502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11ASPAN (American Society for PeriAnesthetic Nursing) (2001) Clinical guideline for the prevention of unplanned perioperative hypothermia. J PeriAnesth Nursing 16, 305314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Sellden, E, Branstrom, R & Brundin, T (1996) Preoperative infusion of amino acids prevents postoperative hypothermia. Br J Anaesth 76, 227234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Moriyama, T, Tsuneyoshi, I, Omae, T, et al. (2008) The effect of amino-acid infusion during off-pump coronary arterial bypass surgery on thermogenic and hormonal regulation. J Anesth 22, 354360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Brundin, T & Wahren, J (1994) Effects of i.v. amino acids on human splanchnic and whole body oxygen consumption, blood flow, and blood temperatures. Am J Physiol 266, (3 Pt 1), E396E402.Google ScholarPubMed
15Morens, C, Gaudichon, C, Fromentin, G, et al. (2001) Daily delivery of dietary nitrogen to the periphery is stable in rats adapted to increased protein intake. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281, E826E836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Waterlow, JC, Garlick, PJ & Millward, DJ (1978) Protein turnover in mammalian tissues and the whole body. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
17Robinson, SM, Jaccard, C, Persaud, C, et al. (1990) Protein turnover and thermogenesis in response to high-protein and high-carbohydrate feeding in men. Am J Clin Nutr 52, 7280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Deshaies, RJ & Joazeiro, CA (2009) RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem 78, 399434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Reyes-Turcu, FE, Ventii, KH & Wilkinson, KD (2009) Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem 78, 363397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Finley, D (2009) Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem 78, 477513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Garlick, PJ, McNurlan, MA & Patlak, CS (1999) Adaptation of protein metabolism in relation to limits to high dietary protein intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, Suppl. 1, S34S43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Hochstenbach-Waelen, A, Veldhorst, MA, Nieuwenhuizen, AG, et al. (2009) Comparison of 2 diets with either 25 % or 10 % of energy as casein on energy expenditure, substrate balance, and appetite profile. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 831838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Greig, PD, Elwyn, DH, Askanazi, J, et al. (1987) Parenteral nutrition in septic patients: effect of increasing nitrogen intake. Am J Clin Nutr 46, 10401047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Price, GM, Halliday, D, Pacy, PJ, et al. (1994) Nitrogen homeostasis in man: influence of protein intake on the amplitude of diurnal cycling of body nitrogen. Clin Sci (Lond) 86, 91102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Harber, MP, Schenk, S, Barkan, AL, et al. (2005) Effects of dietary carbohydrate restriction with high protein intake on protein metabolism and the somatotropic axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90, 51755181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Pannemans, DL, Halliday, D & Westerterp, KR (1995) Whole-body protein turnover in elderly men and women: responses to two protein intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 61, 3338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Pannemans, DL, Halliday, D, Westerterp, KR, et al. (1995) Effect of variable protein intake on whole-body protein turnover in young men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 61, 6974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Millward, DJ & Rivers, JP (1988) The nutritional role of indispensable amino acids and the metabolic basis for their requirements. Eur J Clin Nutr 42, 367393.Google ScholarPubMed
29Millward, DJ (1998) Metabolic demands for amino acids and the human dietary requirement: Millward and Rivers (1988) revisited. J Nutr 128, Suppl. 12, 2563S2576S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Millward, DJ (2003) An adaptive metabolic demand model for protein and amino acid requirements. Br J Nutr 90, 249260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Danpure, CJ (2004) Molecular aetiology of primary hyperoxaluria type 1. Nephron Exp Nephrol 98, e39e44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Lowenstein, JM (1972) Ammonia production in muscle and other tissues: the purine nucleotide cycle. Physiol Rev 52, 382414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Long, CL, Jeevanandam, M & Kinney, JM (1978) Metabolism and recycling of urea in man. Am J Clin Nutr 31, 13671382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Jackson, AA (1995) Salvage of urea-nitrogen and protein requirements. Proc Nutr Soc 54, 535547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Bergen, WG & Wu, G (2009) Intestinal nitrogen recycling and utilization in health and disease. J Nutr 139, 821825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Moundras, C, Remesy, C & Demigne, C (1993) Dietary protein paradox: decrease of amino acid availability induced by high-protein diets. Am J Physiol 264, (6 Pt 1), G1057G1065.Google ScholarPubMed
37Azzout-Marniche, D, Gaudichon, C, Blouet, C, et al. (2007) Liver glyconeogenesis: a pathway to cope with postprandial amino acid excess in high-protein fed rats? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 292, R1400R1407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Bohe, J, Low, JF, Wolfe, RR, et al. (2001) Latency and duration of stimulation of human muscle protein synthesis during continuous infusion of amino acids. J Physiol 532 (Pt 2), 575579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Veldhorst, MA, Westerterp-Plantenga, MS & Westerterp, KR (2009) Gluconeogenesis and energy expenditure after a high-protein, carbohydrate-free diet. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 519526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Livesey, G (1984) The energy equivalents of ATP and the energy values of food proteins and fats. Br J Nutr 51, 1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41van Milgen, J (2002) Modeling biochemical aspects of energy metabolism in mammals. J Nutr 132, 31953202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Ferrer-Lorente, R, Fernandez-Lopez, JA & Alemany, M (2007) Estimation of the metabolizable energy equivalence of dietary proteins. Eur J Nutr 46, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Birkett, S & de Lange, K (2001) A computational framework for a nutrient flow representation of energy utilization by growing monogastric animals. Br J Nutr 86, 661674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Hinkle, PC (2005) P/O ratios of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1706, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Petzke, KJ, Friedrich, M, Metges, CC, et al. (2005) Long-term dietary high protein intake up-regulates tissue specific gene expression of uncoupling proteins 1 and 2 in rats. Eur J Nutr 44, 414421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Hurtaud, C, Gelly, C, Chen, Z, et al. (2007) Glutamine stimulates translation of uncoupling protein 2 mRNA. Cell Mol Life Sci 64, 18531860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Harri, M & Brockway, JM (1985) Effect of dietary protein concentration and ambient temperature on the energy, protein and water metabolism of the rat. Br J Nutr 53, 363372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Stock, MJ (1999) Gluttony and thermogenesis revisited. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 23, 11051117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Kerner, J & Hoppel, C (2000) Fatty acid import into mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1486, 117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Eaton, S (2002) Control of mitochondrial beta-oxidation flux. Prog Lipid Res 41, 197239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51Gadian, DG & Radda, GK (1981) NMR studies of tissue metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem 50, 6983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 The urea synthesis cycle and metabolism of fumarate to yield aspartate.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Adenosine deaminase and the purine nucleotide cycle for ammoniagenesis from amino acids.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Thermogenic steps in the oxidation of amino acid carbon skeletons that contribute citric acid cycle intermediates.

Figure 3

Table 1 Metabolic fates of the carbon skeletons of amino acids

Figure 4

Table 2 ATP yield and thermogenesis from amino acid carbon skeleton oxidation