Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:12:38.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Competition Between Purple Nutsedge and Vegetables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. D. William
Affiliation:
Foreign Area Fellowship Program at Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, M.G., Brazil Training Officer & Crop Mgt. Specialist, Asian Veg. Res. and Dev. Center, P.O. Box 42, Shanhua, Tainan, 741, Taiwan, Republic of China
G. F. Warren
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN 47907

Abstract

Competition studies were conducted in Brazil during 1972 and 1973 between high populations (160 plants/0.1 m2 at 5 to 7 weeks after planting) of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) and the following vegetable crops: garlic (Allium sativum L. ‘Mineiro’), okra (Hibiscus esculentus L. ‘UFV 1152’), carrot (Daucus carota L. ‘Nantes’ and ‘Kuroda’), bush-type green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Topcrop’), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. ‘Aldai’), transplanted cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata ‘Louco’) and transplanted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ‘Santa Rita’). Purple nutsedge grew all year with irrigation, although growth was greater during the warm, wet season (October to March). Crop losses due to purple nutsedge competition during the entire cropping season were as follows: garlic 89%; okra 62%; two carrot cultivars, ‘Kuroda’ and ‘Nantes’ 39% and 50%, respectively; green bean 41%; cucumber 43%; cabbage 35%; and tomato 53%. Critical periods of purple nutsedge competition occurred between 3 and 13 weeks for garlic; 3 and 7 weeks for okra, cucumber and the carrot cultivar ‘Nantes’; 3 and 5 weeks for tomato and the carrot cultivar ‘Kuroda’; and at approximately 4 weeks for cabbage and green bean. Purple nutsedge competed for light in the slow-growing, non-competitive crops and for nutrients in all crops. Competition for water was reduced because the vegetables were irrigated regularly. The rate of leaf area development for a competitive crop, green bean, was similar to the rate for purple nutsedge, whereas the rate was much lower for the non-competitive okra.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Agundis, O.M., Valtierra, A., and Castillo, B. 1962–63. Periodos criticos de competencia entre frijol y malezas (Critical periods of competition between dry beans and weeds). Agr. Tecnica en Mexico 2:8790.Google Scholar
2. Andrews, F.W. 1940. The control of nutgrass in the Sudan Gezira. Empire J. Exp. Agr. 8:215222.Google Scholar
3. Barreto, A. 1970. Competencia entre frijol y malas hierbas (Competition between dry beans and weeds). Agr. Tecnica en Mexico 2:519526.Google Scholar
4. Blanco, H.G. and Oliveira, D.A. 1971. Duração do periodo de competição de plantas daninhas com a cultura de cenoura (Daucus carota L.) (Duration of competitive period between weeds and carrots). O. Biológico (Brazil) 37:37.Google Scholar
5. Blanco, H.G., Oliveira, D.A., and Araújo, J.B.M. 1969. Competição de plantas daninhas com a cultura do feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris) (Competition between weeds and dry beans). O. Biológico (Brazil) 55:304308.Google Scholar
6. Dawson, J.H. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 12:206208.Google Scholar
7. Friedman, T. and Horowitz, M. 1971. Biologically active substances in subterranean parts of purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 19:398401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Harris, V.C. 1962. Nutgrass control by competition. Miss. Farm Res. 21:8.Google Scholar
9. Hauser, E.W. 1962. Establishment of nutsedge from space-planted tubers. Weed Sci. 10:209212.Google Scholar
10. Hauser, E.W. 1962. Development of purple nutsedge under field conditions. Weeds 10:315321.Google Scholar
11. Holm, L. 1971. The role of weeds in human affairs. Weed Sci. 19:485490.Google Scholar
12. Holm, L. and Herberger, J. 1970. Weeds of tropical crops. Proc. Brit. Weed Contr. Conf. 10:11321149.Google Scholar
13. Kasasian, L. and Seeyave, J. 1969. Critical periods for weed competition. PANS 15:208212.Google Scholar
14. Magalhães, A.C. 1967. Observações sobre o efeito da luz no crescimento da tiririca (Cyperus rotundus L.) (Effect of light on purple nutsedge growth). Bragantia (Brazil) 26:131142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Neito, J.H., Brando, M.A., and Gonzalez, J.T. 1968. Critical periods of the crop growth cycle for competition from weeds. PANS 14:159166.Google Scholar
16. Paller, E.C., Guantes, M.M., Soriano, J.M., and Vega, M.R. 1971. Duration of weed competition and weed control and yield. II. Transplanted onions. The Philippine Agr. 55:221224.Google Scholar
17. Panje, R.R. 1968. A new approach to weeding. PANS 14:229235.Google Scholar
18. Radford, P.J. 1967. Growth analysis formulae – their use and abuse. Crop Sci. 7:171175.Google Scholar
19. Romanowski, R.R. and Nakagawa, Y. 1967. Chemical weed control with vegetable crops in Hawaii. Proc. Asian-Pacific Weed Contr. Interchange 1:99102.Google Scholar
20. Shadbolt, C.A. and Holm, L.G. 1956. Some quantitative aspects of weed competition in vegetable crops. Weeds 4:111123.Google Scholar
21. Singh, S.P. 1968. Presence of a growth inhibitor in the tubers of nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus L.). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 67:1823.Google Scholar
22. Vengris, J. and Stacewicz-Spuncakis, M. 1971. Common purslane competition in table beets and snap beans. Weed Sci. 19:46.Google Scholar
23. Vieira, C. 1970. Periodo critico de competição entre ervas daninhas e a cultura do feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). (Critical period of competition between weeds and dry beans.) Rev. CERES (Brazil) 17:354367.Google Scholar
24. Wick, G.A., Johnston, D.N., Nuland, D.S., and Kinbacher, E.J. 1973. Competition between annual weeds and sweet Spanish onions. Weed Sci. 21:436439.Google Scholar
25. William, R.D. 1973. Competição entre tiririca (Cyperus rotundus L.) e o feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (Competition between purple nutsedge and dry beans). Rev. CERES (Brazil) 20:424432.Google Scholar
26. William, R.D. and Warren, G.F. 1975. Suppression of Cyperus rotundus L. in carrots with night applications of nitrofen or herbicidal oil. Weed Res. (In Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Wills, G.D. and Briscoe, G.A. 1970. Anatomy of purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 18:631635.Google Scholar