Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:08:54.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Experimental and Computational Study of the Elastic-Plastic Transition in Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2011

Erica T. Lilleodden
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305- 2205
Jonathan A. Zimmerman
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551
Stephen M. Foiles
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
William D. Nix
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305- 2205
Get access

Abstract

Nanoindentation studies of thin metal films have provided insight into the mechanisms of plasticity in small volumes, showing a strong dependence on the film thickness and grain size. It has been previously shown that an increased dislocation density can be manifested as an increase in the hardness or flow resistance of a material, as described by the Taylor relation [1]. However, when the indentation is confined to very small displacements, the observation can be quite the opposite; an elevated dislocation density can provide an easy mechanism for plasticity at relatively small loads, as contrasted with observations of near-theoretical shear stresses required to initiate dislocation activity in low-dislocation density materials. Experimental observations of the evolution of hardness with displacement show initially soft behavior in small-grained films and initially hard behavior in large-grained films. Furthermore, the small-grained films show immediate hardening, while the large grained films show the ‘softening’ indentation size effect (ISE) associated with strain gradient plasticity. Rationale for such behavior has been based on the availability of dislocation sources at the grain boundary for initiating plasticity. Embedded atom method (EAM) simulations of the initial stages of indentation substantiate this theory; the indentation response varies as expected when the proximity of the indenter to a Σ79 grain boundary is varied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nix, W.D. and Gao, H., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 46 411 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Page, T.F., Oliver, W.C., J. Mater. Res. 7 450 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Michalske, T.A. and Houston, J.E., Acta Mat. 46 391 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Corcoran, S., Colton, R., Lilleodden, E. and Gerberich, W., Phys. Rev. B 55 R16057 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Johnson, K.L., Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University press, New York 1985).Google Scholar
7. Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I., Phys. Rev. B 29 6443 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Kelchner, C.L., Plimpton, S.J. and Hamilton, J.C., Phys. Rev. B 58 11085 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Zimmerman, J.A., Kelchner, C.L., Klein, P.A., Hamilton, J.C. and Foiles, S.M., Phys. Rev. Let., (2001) IN REVIEW.Google Scholar