Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:13:39.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE AND ADVANCED LISTENING COMPREHENSION IN ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Lars Stenius Stæhr
Lars Stenius Stæhr*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
*
*Address correspondence to: Lars Stenius Stæhr, Centre for Internationalisation and Parallel Language Use, Department of English, Germanic, and Romance Studies, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 128-30, DK – 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark; e-mail: lars@hum.ku.dk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents an empirical study that investigates the role of vocabulary knowledge in listening comprehension with 115 advanced Danish learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). The dimensions of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge (measured by the Vocabulary Levels Test and the Word Associates Test) were found to be significantly correlated with listening comprehension (measured by a listening test from the Cambridge certificate of proficiency in English) and could predict half of the variance in the listening scores. This study thus provides empirical evidence that vocabulary knowledge is an important factor for successful listening comprehension in EFL. Furthermore, the results suggest that a lexical coverage of 98% is needed for coping with the spoken texts that constitute the listening test. This coverage figure is consistent with findings from reading research.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 577 - 607
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adolphs, S., & Schmitt, N. (2003). Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics, 24, 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, S., & Schmitt, N. (2004). Vocabulary coverage according to spoken discourse context. In Bogaards, P. & Laufer, B. (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language (pp. 39–49). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In Guthrie, J. T. (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Bejar, I., Douglas, D., Jamieson, J., Nissan, S., & Turner, J. (2000). TOEFL 2000 listening Framework (TOEFL monograph series, MS-19). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Bonk, W. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14, 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boroughs, R. (2003). The change process at the paper level: Paper 4. Listening. In Weir, C. J. & Milanovic, M. (Eds.), Studies in language testing 15: Continuity and innovation—Revising the Cambridge proficiency in English examination 1913–2002 (pp. 315–366). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buck, G. (1992). Listening comprehension: Construct validity and trait characteristics. Language Learning, 42, 313–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 98–111.Google Scholar
Chujo, K., & Utiyama, M. (2005). Understanding the role of text length, sample size and vocabulary size in determining text coverage. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17, 1–22.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. A. (1980). The ‘short circuit’ hypothesis of ESL reading—or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal, 64, 203–209.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (2000). The compleat lexical tutor [Web site]. Retrieved September 21, 2007, from www.lextutor.ca.Google Scholar
Conrad, L. (1985). Semantic versus syntactic cues in listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CPE Handbook. (2002). Certificate of proficiency in English handbook: Specifications and sample papers for revised examination from December 2002. University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.Google Scholar
Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T., & McNamara, T. (1999). Studies in language testing 7: Dictionary of language testing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75.Google Scholar
Greidanus, T., Bogaards, P., van der Linden, E., Nienhuis, L., & de Wolf, T. (2004). The construction and validation of a deep word knowledge test for advanced learners of French. In Bogaards, P. & Laufer, B. (Eds.),Vocabulary in a second language (pp. 191–208). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greidanus, T., & Nienhuis, L. (2001). Testing the quality of word knowledge in L2 by means of word associations: Types of distracters and types of associations. Modern Language Journal, 85, 567–577.Google Scholar
Haastrup, K., & Henriksen, B. (1998). Vocabulary acquisition: From partial to precise understanding. In Haastrup, K. & Viberg, Å. (Eds.), Perspectives on lexical acquisition in a second language (pp. 97–124). Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Haastrup, K., & Henriksen, B. (2000). Vocabulary acquisition: Acquiring depth of knowledge through network building. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 221–240.Google Scholar
Hazenberg, S., & Hulstijn, J. H. (1996). Defining a minimal second language vocabulary for non-native university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17, 145–163.Google Scholar
Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 303–317.Google Scholar
Henriksen, B., Albrechtsen, D., & Haastrup, K. (2004). The relationship between vocabulary size and reading comprehension in the L2. Angles on the English-Speaking World, 4, 129–140.Google Scholar
Hirsh, D., & Nation, I. S. P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8, 689–696.Google Scholar
Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13, 403–430.Google Scholar
Joe, A. (1995). Text-based tasks and incidental vocabulary learning. Second Language Research, 11, 149–158.Google Scholar
Jones, N. (2001). Reliability as one aspect of test quality. Research Notes, 4, 2–5.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. (1991). Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 135–149.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In Lauren, C. & Nordman, M. (Eds.), Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines (pp. 316–223). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In Arnaud, P. J. L. & Béjoint, H. (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126–132). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, R. (1991). A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 75, 196–204.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 3–19.Google Scholar
Lynch, T., & Mendelsohn, D. (2002). Listening. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 193–210). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Meara, P. (1996a). The dimensions of lexical competence. In Brown, G., Malmkjær, K., & Williams, J. (Eds.), Performance and competence in second language acquisition (pp. 35–53). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meara, P. (1996b). The vocabulary knowledge framework. Retrieved April 6, 2009, from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/vlibrary/meara1996c.pdf.Google Scholar
Meara, P., & Wolter, B. (2004). V_Links: Beyond vocabulary depth. Angles on the English-Speaking World, 4, 129–140.Google Scholar
Mecartty, F. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11, 323–348.Google Scholar
Milton, J., Wade, J., & Hopkins, N. (in press). Aural word recognition and oral competence in a foreign language. In Chacón-Beltrán, R., Abello-Contesse, C., Torreblanca-López, M., & López-Jiménez, M. (Eds.), Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (n.d.). Measuring learners’ present level of vocabulary knowledge (vocabulary resource booklet). Retrieved February 6, 2007, from http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation/nation.aspx.Google Scholar
Nurweni, A., & Read, J. (1999). The English vocabulary knowledge of Indonesian university students. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 282–307.Google Scholar
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52, 513–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, D. D., & Schedl, M. (2004). Evaluating an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 21, 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, J. (1988). Measuring the vocabulary knowledge of second language learners. RELC Journal, 19, 12–25.Google Scholar
Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10, 355–371.Google Scholar
Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In Kunnan, A. (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 41–60). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In Bogaards, P. & Laufer, B. (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language (pp. 209–227). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. Modern Language Journal, 78, 199–221.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Rinehart, B. (1994). The effect of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 78, 179–189.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 48, 281–317.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1999). The relationship between TOEFL vocabulary items and meaning, association, collocation and word-class knowledge. Language Testing, 16, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (in press). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework: Word associations and verbal suffixes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 17–37.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–89.Google Scholar
Schonell, F. J., Meddleton, I. G., & Shaw, B. A. (1956). A study of the oral vocabulary of adults. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Schoonen, R., & Verhallen, M. (1998). Kennis van woorden: De toetsing van diepe woordkennis [Knowledge of words: The testing of deep word knowledge]. Pedagogische Studiën, 75, 153–168.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second language. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 382–408). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E., & Inbar, O. (1991). Validation of listening comprehension tests: The effects of text and question type. Language Testing, 8, 23–40.Google Scholar
Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of reading, listening and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36, 139–152.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2003a). From prediction through reflection: Guiding the students through the process of L2 listening. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 425–440.Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2003b). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53, 463–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? Modern Language Journal, 90, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191–210.Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodatari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire (MALQ): Development and validation. Language Learning, 56, 431–462.Google Scholar
Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–235.Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 33–52.Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28, 46–65.Google Scholar
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 13–40.Google Scholar
West, M. (1953). A general service list of English words. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wilks, C., & Meara, P. (2002). Untangling word webs: Graph theory and the notion of density in second language word association networks. Second Language Research, 18, 303–324.Google Scholar
Wolter, B. (2001). Comparing the L1 and the L2 mental lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 41–69.Google Scholar