Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:57:00.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Securities Transaction Taxes and Market Quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2018

Abstract

We study changes in market quality associated with 9 modifications to the New York State securities transaction tax (STT) between 1932 and 1981 and 3 changes to the federal STT between 1932 and 1966. We find that when there is an increase in the level of an STT, individual stock volatility increases, bid–ask spreads widen, price impacts are greater, and volume decreases. We examine the propensity of traders to switch trading locations to avoid the tax and find mixed evidence that they will change locations. Overall, our findings support the notion that the imposition of or increases in an STT harm market quality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We thank an anonymous referee, Yakov Amihud, Amber Anand, Hendrik Bessembinder (the editor), Corey Garriott, Sermin Gungor, Nikolaus Hautsch, Scott Hendry, Charles Jones, Andrew Karolyi, Simi Kedia, Teodora Paligorova, Oded Palmon, Joshua Slive, Aron Veress, Gwendolyn Webb, Jonathan Witmer, Xing Zhou, and conference participants at the 2012 Erasmus Liquidity Conference and the 2012 Groupement de Recherche Européen (GdRE) Annual Symposium on Money, Banking and Finance for helpful comments on earlier versions of this study. We thank the Whitcomb Center for Research in Financial Services for research support. This is an updated version of the Bank of Canada Working Paper 2011–26.

References

Amihud, Y.Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects.” Journal of Financial Markets, 5 (2002), 3156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H.. “Transaction Taxes and Stock Values.” In Modernizing U.S. Securities Regulations: Economic and Legal Perspectives, Kamphuis, R. W., ed. New York, NY: Irwin Professional Publishing (1992), 477500.Google Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H.. “Effects of a New York State Stock Transaction Tax.” Working Paper, New York University (2003).Google Scholar
Asparouhova, E.; Bessembinder, H.; and Kalcheva, I.. “Liquidity Biases in Asset Pricing Tests.” Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2010), 215237.Google Scholar
Baltagi, B. H.; Li, D.; and Li, Q.. “Transaction Tax and Stock Market Behavior: Evidence from an Emerging Market.” Empirical Economics, 31 (2006), 393408.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, R.; O’Hara, M.; and Saar, G.. “How Noise Trading Affects Markets: An Experimental Analysis.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 22752302.Google Scholar
Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax Commission. 429 U.S. 318 (1977).Google Scholar
Campbell, J. Y., and Froot, K. A.. “International Experiences with Securities Transaction Taxes.” In The Internationalization of Equity Markets, Frankel, J., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (1994), 277308.Google Scholar
Diether, K. B.; Lee, K.; and Werner, I. M.. “It’s SHO Time! Short-Sale Price Tests and Market Quality.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 3773.Google Scholar
Goyenko, R. Y.; Holden, C. W.; and Trzcinka, C.. “Do Liquidity Measures Measure Liquidity?” Journal of Financial Economics, 92 (2009), 153181.Google Scholar
Greene, W. H. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall (2003).Google Scholar
Hasbrouck, J., and Schwartz, R.. “Liquidity and Execution Costs in Equity Markets.” Journal of Portfolio Management, 14 (1988), 1016.Google Scholar
Hau, H.The Role of Transaction Costs for Financial Volatility: Evidence from the Paris Bourse.” Journal of the European Economic Association, 4 (2006), 862890.Google Scholar
Hausman, J.Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica, 46 (1978), 12511272.Google Scholar
Holden, C. W.New Low-Frequency Liquidity Measures.” Journal of Financial Markets, 12 (2009), 778813.Google Scholar
Hu, S.The Effects of the Stock Transaction Tax on the Stock Market—Experience from Asian Markets.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 6 (1998), 347364.Google Scholar
Jarrell, G. A.Change at the Exchange: The Causes and Effects of Deregulation.” Journal of Law and Economics, 27 (1984), 273312.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. L., and Kotz, S.. Continuous Univariate Distributions. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin (1970).Google Scholar
Jones, C. M.Shorting Restrictions: Revisiting the 1930s.” Financial Review, 47 (2012), 135.Google Scholar
Jones, C. M., and Seguin, P.. “Transaction Costs and Price Volatility: Evidence from Commission Deregulation.” American Economic Review, 87 (1997), 728737.Google Scholar
Liu, S.Securities Transaction Tax and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Japanese Experience.” Journal of Financial Services Research, 32 (2007), 161176.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London, UK: MacMillan (1936).Google Scholar
Kupiec, P. H.Noise Traders, Excess Volatility, and a Securities Transactions Tax.” Journal of Financial Services Research, 10 (1996), 115129.Google Scholar
New York Times. “The Stock Transfer Tax.” New York Times, Jan. 22 (1906), 13.Google Scholar
New York Times. “New Transfer Tax Asked by Lehman: Message Calls for Rate Based on Sale Price to Curb Growth of Par Value Evasions.” New York Times, Mar. 25 (1933), 21.Google Scholar
New York Times. “Stock-Transfer Tax Cut Is Signed.” New York Times, June 23 (1968), 44.Google Scholar
Newey, W. K., and West, K. D.. “A Simple Semi-Definite, Heteroscedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix.” Econometrica, 55 (1987), 703708.Google Scholar
Phylaktis, K., and Aristidou, A. A.. “Security Transaction Taxes and Financial Volatility: Athens Stock Exchange.” Applied Financial Economics, 17 (2007), 14551467.Google Scholar
Roll, R.A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market.” Journal of Finance, 39 (1984), 11271139.Google Scholar
Roll, R.Price Volatility, International Market Links, and Their Implications for Regulatory Policies.” Journal of Financial Services Research, 3 (1989), 211246.Google Scholar
Sahu, D.“Does Securities Transaction Tax Distort Market Microstructure? Evidence from Indian Stock Market.” Working Paper, Banaras Hindu University (2008).Google Scholar
Saporta, V., and Kamhon, K.. “The Effects of Stamp Duty on the Level and Volatility of UK Equity Prices.” Working Paper, Bank of England (1997).Google Scholar
Schwert, G. W., and Seguin, P. J.. “Heteroscedasticity in Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 45 (1990), 11291155.Google Scholar
Schwert, G. W., and Seguin, P. J.. “Securities Transaction Taxes: An Overview of Costs, Benefits and Unresolved Questions.” Financial Analysts Journal, 49 (1993), 2735.Google Scholar
Song, F. M., and Zhang, J.. “Securities Transaction Tax and Market Volatility.” Economic Journal, 115 (2005), 11031120.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E.Using Tax Policy to Curb Speculative Short-Term Trading.” Journal of Financial Services Research, 39 (1989), 101115.Google Scholar
Summers, L. H., and Summers, V. P.. “When Financial Markets Work Too Well: A Cautious Case for a Securities Transaction Tax.” Journal of Financial Service Research, 3 (1989), 261286.Google Scholar
Tobin, J.A Proposal for International Monetary Reform.” Eastern Economic Journal, 4 (1978), 153159.Google Scholar
Umlauf, S. R.Transaction Taxes and the Behavior of the Swedish Stock Market.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 227240.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pomeranets and Weaver supplementary material

Pomeranets and Weaver supplementary material 1

Download Pomeranets and Weaver supplementary material(File)
File 378.5 KB