Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:03:34.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Great Men in the jungle of nations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

N. James
N. James*
Affiliation:
*Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Moctezuma, Aztec ruler was the last of four big temporary exhibitions about ‘world rulers’ that the British Museum has put on in the past three years. Moctezuma was the king who received Cortés and the Conquistadores in 1519 and was killed the next year in their custody. The previous three exhibitions were on the First Emperor of China, the Roman Emperor, Hadrian, and Shah ‘Abbas, respectively. Hadrian and The First Emperor were archaeological (James 2008a, 2008c). So was Moctezuma. It ran from September 2009 to January 2010.

Kingship is evidently in vogue among London’s galleries. During The First Emperor’s showing, Tutankhamun entertained on the other side of the river (James 2008b); and the Victoria & Albert Museum mounted Maharaja during Moctezuma’s run. There are good reasons for thinking about kings in any society, regardless of political constitution, because, in their coronations, their deeds and their deaths or funerals, they are ‘collective representations’. Whether as heroes or as scapegoats, democracies tend to promote ‘celebrities’ by the same token and, as well as governing, perhaps monarchs, ancient or contemporary, served and serve that function too. Historians, sociologists and anthropologists have tackled these themes through comparison and so have archaeologists, with epigraphy, iconography and the excavation of palaces and tombs (Blanton et al. 1996; Quigley 2005).

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 84 , Issue 323 , March 2010 , pp. 236 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berdan, F.F., Blanton, R.E., Boone, E.H., Hodge, M.G., Smith, M.E. & Umberger, E.. 1996. Aztec imperial strategies. Washington (DC): Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
Blanton, R.E., Feinman, G.M., Kowalewski, S.A. & Peregrine, P.N.. 1996. A dual-processual theory for the evolution of Mesoamerican civilization. Current Anthropology 37: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clendinnen, I. 1991. Aztecs: an interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graulich, M. 1994. Montezuma, ou L'apogée et la chute de L'empire aztèque. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Solana Rickards, N. 1983. Objetos ceremoniales en piedra de la cultura mexica. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
James, N. 2003. The Aztecs in London. Antiquity 77: 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, N. 2008a. Tutankhamun and the terracotta army. Antiquity 82: 199–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, N. 2008b. (Rome + Barbarians) = Europe? Antiquity 82: 493–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, N. 2008c. Can a museum explain imperialism? Antiquity 82: 1104–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwan, C. & Luján, L. López (ed.). 2009. Moctezuma, Aztec ruler. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Opper, T. 2008. Hadrian: empire and conflict. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Purdum, E.D. & Paredes, J.A.. 1989. Rituals of death: capital punishment and human sacrifice, in Radelet, M.L. (ed.) Facing the death penalty: essays on a cruel and unusual punishment: 139–155. Philadelphia (PA): Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Quigley, D. 2005. Introduction: the character of kingship, in Quigley, D. (ed.) The character of kingship: 1–23. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
White, L.A. 1948. Ikhnaton: the Great Man vs. the culture process. Journal of the American Oriental Society 68: 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar