Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:04:20.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genotypic relationships between Taenia saginata, Taenia asiatica and their hybrids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2013

KANAKO YAMANE
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Yamaguchi, Japan
TETSUYA YANAGIDA
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
TIAOYING LI
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Sichuan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
XINGWANG CHEN
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Sichuan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
PARON DEKUMYOY
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
JITRA WAIKAGUL
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
AGATHE NKOUAWA
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
MINORU NAKAO
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
YASUHITO SAKO
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
AKIRA ITO
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
HIROSHI SATO
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Yamaguchi, Japan
MUNEHIRO OKAMOTO*
Affiliation:
Section of Wildlife Diversity, Center for Human Evolution Modeling Research, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Section of Wildlife Diversity, Center for Human Evolution Modeling Research, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, 41-2 Kanrin, Inuyama-shi, Aichi 484-8506, Japan. Tel: +81-568-63-0584. Fax: +81-568-63-0085. E-mail: mokamoto@pri.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Summary

Partial sequences of the DNA polymerase delta (pold) gene from Taenia saginata-like adult worms were sequenced. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that pold gene sequences were clearly divided into two clades, differing from each other in five to seven nucleotides. There is little doubt that T. saginata and Taenia asiatica were once separated into two distinct taxa as has been concluded in previous studies. On the other hand, most of the adult worms, which were identified as T. asiatica using mitochondrial DNA, were homozygous for an allele that originated from the allele of T. saginata via single nucleotide substitution. These results indicate that most of the adult worms, which had been called T. asiatica, are not actually ‘pure T. asiatica’ but instead originated from the hybridization of ‘pure T. saginata’ and ‘pure T. asiatica’.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anantaphruti, M. T., Yamasaki, H., Nakao, M., Waikagul, J., Watthanakulpanich, D., Nuamtanon, S., Maipanich, W., Pubampen, S., Sanguankiat, S., Muennoo, C., Nakaya, K., Sato, M. O., Sako, Y., Okamoto, M. and Ito, A. (2007). Sympatric occurrence of Taenia solium, T. saginata, and T. asiatica, Thailand. Emerging Infectious Diseases 13, 14131416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, J. and McManus, D. P. (1994). Genetic characterization of the Asian Taenia, a newly described Taeniid cestode of humans. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 50, 3344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, D. and Fan, P. C. (1986). Larval stage of a possible new species of tapeworm from Taiwan aborigines. Chinese Bioscience 27, 16.Google Scholar
Clement, M., Posada, D. and Crandall, K. (2000). TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9, 16571659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eom, K. S., Jeon, H. K., Kong, Y., Hwang, U. W., Yang, Y., Li, X., Xu, L., Feng, Z., Pawlowski, Z. S. and Rim, H. J. (2002). Identification of Taenia asiatica in China: molecular, morphological, and epidemiological analysis of a Luzhai isolate. Journal of Parasitology 88, 758764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eom, K. S. and Rim, H. J. (1993). Morphologic descriptions of Taenia asiatica sp. n. Korean Journal of Parasitology 3, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, R. C. (1988). Taiwan Taenia and taeniasis. Parasitology Today 4, 8688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, P. C., Chung, W. C., Lin, C. Y. and Wu, C. C. (1990 c). The pig as an intermediate host for Taiwan Taenia infection. Journal of Helminthology 64, 223231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, P. C., Kosman, M. L., Kosin, E., Depary, A. A. and Napitupulu, T. (1990 a). Indonesia Taenia and taeniasis. Yonsei Report in Tropical Medicine 21, 3337.Google Scholar
Fan, P. C., Soh, C. T. and Kosin, E. (1990 b). Pig as a favorable intermediate host of a possible new species of Taenia in Asia. Yonsei Report in Tropical Medicine 21, 3958.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flisser, A., Viniegra, A. E., Aguilar-Vega, L., Garza-Rodriguez, A., Maravilla, P. and Avila, G. (2004). Portrait of human tapeworms. Journal of Parasitology 90, 914916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haukisalmi, V., Lavikainen, A., Laaksonen, S. and Meri, S. (2011). Taenia arctos n. sp. (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea: Taeniidae) from its definitive (brown bear Ursus arctos Linnaeus) and intermediate (moose/elk Alces spp.) hosts. Systematic Parasitology 80, 217230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberg, E. P. (2002). Taenia tapeworms: their biology, evolution and socioeconomic significance. Microbes and Infection 4, 859866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoberg, E. P. (2006). Phylogeny of Taenia: species definitions and origins of human parasites. Parasitology International 55, S23S30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, A., Nakao, M. and Wandra, T. (2003). Human taeniasis and cysticercosis in Asia. Lancet 362, 19181920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loos-Frank, B. (2000). An up-date of Verster's (1969) ‘Taxonomic revision of the genus Taenia Linnaeus’ (Cestoda) in table format. Systematic Parasitology 45, 155183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1996). What is a species, and what is not? Philosophy of Science 63, 262277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, M., Nakao, M., Blair, D., Anantaphruti, M. T., Waikagul, J. and Ito, A. (2010). Evidence of hybridization between Taenia saginata and Taenia asiatica. Parasitology International 59, 7074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okamoto, M., Nakao, M., Tachi, E., Sako, Y., Sato, M. O., Yamasaki, H., Nakaya, K. and Ito, A. (2007). Asian Taenia: species or subspecies? Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 38(Suppl. 1), 125130.Google Scholar
Rossin, M. A., Timi, J. T. and Hoberg, E. P. (2010). An endemic Taenia from South America: validation of T. talicei Dollfus, 1960 (Cestoda: Taeniidae) with characterization of metacestodes and adults. Zootaxa 2636, 4958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstruction phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4, 406425.Google Scholar
Simanjuntak, G. M., Margono, S. S., Okamoto, M. and Ito, A. (1997). Taeniasis/cysticercosis in Indonesia as an emerging disease. Parasitology Today 13, 321323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, K., Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2004). Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 1103011035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2011). MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28, 27312737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Templeton, A. R., Crandall, K. A. and Sing, C. F. (1992). A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132, 619633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. and Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 46734680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamane, K., Suzuki, Y., Tachi, E., Li, T., Chen, X., Nakao, N., Nkouawa, A., Yanagida, T., Sako, Y., Ito, A., Sato, H. and Okamoto, M. (2012). Recent hybridization between Taenia asiatica and Taenia saginata. Parasitology International 61, 351355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamasaki, H., Allan, J. C., Sato, M. O., Nakao, M., Sako, Y., Nakaya, K., Qiu, D., Mamuti, W., Craig, P. S. and Ito, A. (2004). DNA differential diagnosis of taeniasis and cysticercosis by multiplex PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42, 548553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zarlenga, D. S., McManus, D. P., Fan, P. C. and Cross, J. H. (1991). Characterization and detection of a newly described Asian taeniid using cloned ribosormal DNA fragments and sequence amplification by the polymerase chain reaction. Experimental Parasitology 72, 174183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar