Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:03:49.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shifting International Security Norms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2017

Extract

The world is going through a crisis of the international liberal order, exemplified by a host of recent shocks: the invasion and annexation of Crimea by Russia; the transnational dimensions of conflicts such as in Syria; the United Kingdom's decision to exit the European Union; the attempted coup d’état in Turkey and its reversal toward autocracy; and the election and rise of non-universalist and illiberal governments as well as politicians who operate under the populist rubric in countries that are viewed as beacons of democracy and stability. These shocks have catalyzed two outcomes. First, the prevailing global norms that serve as the custodians of peace and security have been the subject of revived debate. Second, and relatedly, these shocks have prompted deep reflection on the role of institutions such as the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), as well as the roles of the supposedly democratic members within those institutions.

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Garcia, Denise, Small Arms and Security: New Emerging International Norms (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar.

2 Garcia, Denise, Disarmament Diplomacy and Human Security (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011)Google Scholar.

3 Garcia, Denise, “Humanitarian Security Regimes,” International Affairs 91, no. 1 (2015), pp. 5575 Google Scholar.