Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T01:32:25.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Merovingian Surprise: Early Medieval Radiocarbon Dates on Cremated Bone (Borsbeek, Belgium)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Guy De Mulder*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
Mark van Strydonck
Affiliation:
Royal Institute for Cultural Heritage, Jubelpark 1, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
Rica Annaert
Affiliation:
Flemish Heritage Institute, Phoenix-gebouw, Koning Albert II-laan 19, bus 5, B-1210 Brussels, Belgium
Mathieu Boudin
Affiliation:
Royal Institute for Cultural Heritage, Jubelpark 1, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
*
Corresponding author. Email: Guy.DeMulder@UGent.be
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radiocarbon dating of cremated bone is a well-established practice in the study of prehistoric cremation cemeteries since the introduction of the method in the late 1990s. 14C dates on the Late Bronze Age urnfield and Merovingian cemetery at Borsbeek in Belgium shed new light on Merovingian funerary practices. Inhumation was the dominant funerary rite in this period in the Austrasian region. In the Scheldt Valley, however, some cremations are known, termed Brandgrubengräber, which consist of the deposition of a mix of cremated bone and the remnants from the pyre in the grave pit. 14C dates from Borsbeek show that other ways of deposition of cremated bone in this period existed. In both cases, bones were selected from the pyre and wrapped in an organic container before being buried. Recent excavation and 14C dates from another Merovingian cemetery at Broechem confirmed the information about the burial rites and chronology from Borsbeek. This early Medieval practice of cremation rituals seems an indication of new arrivals of colonists from northern regions where cremation remained the dominant funerary rite. Another case at Borsbeek shows the reuse of a Late Bronze Age urn in the Merovingian period. This practice is known from Viking burials in Scandinavia, but was not ascertained until now in Flanders.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Annaert, R. In press. Who was buried at the Broechem cemetery (5th–7th century AD – B, Antwerp)? In: Annaert, R, editor. The Very Beginning of Europe? Cultural and Social Dimensions of Early Medieval Migration and Colonisation (5th–8th century). Proceedings of the ACE-colloquium, 17–19 May 2011, Brussels. Brussels: Relicta. Monografieën.Google Scholar
Annaert, R, Deforce, K, Vandenbruaene, M. 2010. The cremation graves at the Broechem cemetery (prov. of Antwerp, Belgium). In: Ludowici, B, Panhuysen, T, editors. Transformations in North-Western Europe. Proceedings of the 60th Sachsensymposion, 19–23 September 2009, Maastricht. Hannover: Neue Studien zur Sachsenforschung 3.Google Scholar
Bostyn, F, Blancquaert, G, Lanchon, Y. 2000. Un enclos triple du Bronze ancien à Frethun (Pas-de-Calais). In: Habitats et nécropoles à l'Âge du Bronze sur le Transmanche et le T.G.V. Nord. Paris: Société Préhistorique Française. Travaux 1. p 109–28.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.Google Scholar
De Boe, G. 1970. Een merovingisch grafveld te Borsbeek (Antwerpen). Brussels: Archaeologia Belgica. 123 p.Google Scholar
Delaruelle, S, Van Doninck, J. 2009. Uit Kempische bodem. Recent archeologisch onderzoek in de regio Turnhout. AVRA Bulletin 10:417.Google Scholar
De Mulder, G, Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, Leclercq, W, Paridaens, N, Warmenbol, E. 2007. Re-evaluation of the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age chronology of the western Belgian urnfields based on 14C dating of cremated bones. Radiocarbon 49(2):499514.Google Scholar
Desittere, M, Goossens, A. 1966. Twee uitzonderlijke graven van de Urnenveldenkultuur uit Borsbeek (prov. Antwerpen). Helinium 6:218–29.Google Scholar
Dobney, K, Ervynck, A. 2007. To fish or not to fish? Evidence for the possible avoidance of fish consumption during the Iron Age around the North Sea. In: Haselgrove, C, Moore, T, editors. The Later Iron Age in Britain and Beyond. Oxford: Oxbow Books, p 403–18.Google Scholar
Faider-Feytmans, G. 1970. Les nécropoles mérovingiennes. Morlanwelz: Les collections d'archéologie régionale du Musée de Mariemont, II. 320 p.Google Scholar
Lanting, JN, van der Plicht, J. 2001/2002. De 14C-chronologie van de Nederlandse pre- en protohistorie, IV: bronstijd en vroege ijzertijd. Palaeohistoria 43/44:117262.Google Scholar
Lanting, JN, Aerts-Bijma, AT, van der Plicht, J. 2001. Dating of cremated bones. Radiocarbon 43(2A):249–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leclercq, W, Pion, C. 2010. Quand les fossoyeurs du haut Moyen Âge se heurtent à la Protohistoire: sur la découverte de deux tombes de l'âge du Bronze dans le cimetière mérovingien de Wellin (province de Luxembourg, Belgique). Lunula, Archaeologia Protohistorica 17:101–6.Google Scholar
Magnus Artelius, T. 2010. Creating a history – Viking Age re-use of Bronze Age barrows in south-western Sweden. In: 16th Annual Meeting. The European Association of Archaeologists, 1–5 September 2010. The Hague, the Netherlands. Leiden, p 58.Google Scholar
Moody, G. 2008. The Isle of Thanet from Prehistory to the Norman Conquest. Chalford: Tempus Publishing. 162 p.Google Scholar
Naysmith, P, Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Heinemeier, J, van der Plicht, J, Van Strydonck, M, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Freeman, SPHT. 2007. A cremated bone intercomparison study. Radiocarbon 49(2):403–8.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.Google Scholar
Van Doorselaer, A. 1981. De merovingische beschaving in de Scheldevallei. Kortrijk: Westvlaamse Archaeologica Monografieën II.Google Scholar
Van Doorselaer, A, Opsteyn, L. 1999. Saksische brandrestengraven op de Zwijvekekouter te Dendermonde. Vobov-Info 50:1522.Google Scholar
Van Doorselaer, A, Rogge, M. 1985. Continuité d'un rite funéraire spécifique dans la vallée de l'Escaut, de l'âge du fer au haut Moyen Âge (Mélanges d'archéologie nationale offerts au R.P. Wankenne S.J. pour son 75e anniversaire). Les Etudes Classiques LIII(1):153–70.Google Scholar
Van Impe, L. 1972. Een urnenveld te Borsbeek. Brussel: Archaeologia Belgica, 140. 37 p.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, Hoefkens, M, De Mulder, G. 2005. 14C-dating of cremated bones, why does it work? Lunula, Archaeologia Protohistorica 13:310.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, De Mulder, G. 2009a. 14C dating of cremated bones: the issue of sample contamination. Radiocarbon 51(2):553–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Ervynck, A, Vandenbruaene, A, Boudin, M. 2009b. Anthropology and 14C analysis of skeletal remains from relic shrines: an unexpected source of information for Medieval archaeology. Radiocarbon 51(2):569–77.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, De Mulder, G. 2010. The carbon origin of structural carbonate in bone apatite of cremated bones. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):578–86.Google Scholar
Williams, HMR. 1999. Placing the dead: investigating the location of wealthy barrow burials in seventh century England. In: Rundkvist, M, editor. Grave Matters. Eight Studies of First Millennium AD Burials in Crimea, England and Southern Scandinavia. BAR International Series 781. Oxford: Archaeopress. p 5786.Google Scholar