Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:09:47.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bind Rationale to Need: Operationalizing Special & Differential Treatment in the WTO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Andrew D. Mitchell*
Affiliation:
Melbourne Law School

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Learning from Doha: Can “Development” be Operationalized in International Economic Law?
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Finger, J. Michael, Developing Countries in the WTO System, 31 World Economy 887 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Hudec, Robert, Developing Countries in the GATT 181, 187 (1987)Google Scholar.

3 Id. at 187.

4 See Mitchell, Andrew, A Legal Principle of Special and Differential Treatment for WTO Disputes, 5 World Trade Review 446 (2006) 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mitchell, Andrew, Legal Principles in WTO Disputes (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, ch. 7.

5 HUDEC, supra note 2, at 187-8.

6 Hoekman, Bernard, Operationalizing the Concept of Policy Space in the WTO: Beyond Special and Differential Treatment, 8 J. Int’l Eco. L. 409, 416-7, 422 (2005)Google Scholar.

7 Trachtman, Joel, Ensuring a Development-friendly WTO, 1 Bridges Monthly Rev. 18 (Feb. 2008)Google Scholar.

8 Keck, Alexander and Low, Patrick, Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO: Why, When, and How? in Economic Development and Multilateral Trade Cooperation, 147, 175-6, 178-9, 182 (Evenett, Simon & Hoekman, Bernard eds., 2006)Google Scholar.

9 WTO, World Trade Report 303 (2007).