Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:59:15.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intra-word phonological variability in young children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Laurence B. Leonard
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Lynne E. Rowan
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Barbara Morris
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Marc E. Fey
Affiliation:
Purdue University

Abstract

Three experiments are reported which explored the conditions under which intra-word phonological variability occurs. Using an unsolicited imitation task, evidence of variability was obtained for words containing two or more phonological characteristics (consonants, word shapes) that were unstable in the child's speech, and for words containing both unstable characteristics and characteristics the child had not shown any evidence of producing with accuracy. Intra-word variability was most likely to occur when more than one aspect was in a state of instability or when one aspect was unstable and another was non-acquired. Words containing two phonological aspects not yet acquired by the child seemed to have little influence on variability. The findings indicate that variability can be attributed to (1) the presence of optional simplification processes, (2) the presence of more than one process applicable to a specific aspect of the word, (3) a competition between two aspects of the word for accurate surface realization, and/or (4) a competition between consonant approximation and word shape approximation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braine, M. (1976). Review of The acquisition of phonology. Lg 52. 489–98.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. (1979). Phonological processes in fricative acquisition. PRCLD 7. 98105.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1978). Learning to pronounce: the earliest stages of phonological development. In Minifie, F. & Lloyd, L.. (eds), Communicative and cognitive abilities: early behavioral assessment. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. & Farwell, C. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Lg 51. 419–39.Google Scholar
Garnica, O. & Edwards, M. (1977). Phonological variation in children's speech: the trade-off phenomenon. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 22. 81–7.Google Scholar
Klein, H. (1979). Imitative or spontaneous word productions: what's the difference. Paper presented to American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Newhoff, M. & Mesalam, L. (1980). Individual differences in early child phonology. ApplPsycholing 1. 730.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Schwartz, R., Folger, M. & Wilcox, M. (1978). Some aspects of child phonology in imitative and spontaneous speech. JChLang 5. 403–15.Google Scholar
Macken, M. (1979). The child's lexical representation: the ‘puzzle-puddle-pickle’ evidence. JL 16, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L. (1976). Pattern, control, and contrast in beginning speech. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Shibamoto, J. & Olmsted, D. (1978). Lexical and syllabic patterns in phonological acquisition. JChLang 5. 417–56.Google Scholar
Waterson, N. (1971). Child phonology: a prosodic view. JL 7. 179211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar