Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:45:54.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Won't Lola Run? An Experiment Examining Stereotype Threat and Political Ambition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2016

Scott Pruysers  and
Julie Blais
Scott Pruysers
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Julie Blais
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Among the most well-documented and long-standing gender gaps in political behavior are those relating to political ambition, as men have consistently been shown to express a significantly higher level of political ambition than women. Although this gap is well established, the reasons for the differences between men and women remain largely unknown. One possible explanation is that negative stereotypes about women's political ability are responsible. Stereotype threat, as it is referred to in the psychology literature, is a phenomenon where individuals of a social group suffer cognitive burdens and anxiety after being exposed to negative stereotypes that relate to their identity. These disruptions have been shown to alter attitudes and behavior. In order to test this possibility, we employed an experimental design whereby we randomly assigned 501 undergraduate students into threat and nonthreat conditions. While men exhibited higher levels of political ambition in both conditions, women in the nonthreat condition expressed significantly higher levels of political ambition than those women who were exposed to negative stereotypes. The results of this study therefore suggest that the gender gap in political ambition may be partly explained by negative stereotypes about women in politics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 232 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aalberg, Toril, and Jenssen, Anders Todal. 2007. “Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates: An Experimental Study of Political Communication.” Nordicom Review 28 (1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Karrin Vasby. 2011. “‘Rhymes with Blunt’: Pornification and U.S. Political Culture.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 14 (2): 327–68.Google Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., and Berry, Christopher R.. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 478–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashevkin, Sylvia. 2009. Women, Power, Politics: The Hidden Story of Canada's Unfinished Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Jerome, and Erickson, Lynda. 2003. “Women Candidates and Voter Bias: Do Women Politicians Need to be Better?” Electoral Studies 22 (1): 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bledsoe, Timothy, and Herring, Mary. 1990. “Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Political Office.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 213–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordon. 2011. “Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians.” The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordon. 2013 He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes do not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1985. “Political Elites and Sex Differences in Political Ambition: A Reconsideration.” Journal of Politics 47 (4): 1231–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caul, Miki. 2001. “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-national Analysis.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1214–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caul, Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Janet. 1994. “Getting There: Women in Political Office.” In Different Roles, Different Voices, ed. Githens, Marianne, Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Constantini, Edmond. 1990. “Political Women and Political Ambition: Closing the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 741–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croizet, Jean-Claude, and Claire, Theresa. 1998. “Extending the Concept of Stereotype and Threat to Social Class: The Intellectual Underperformance of Students from Low Socioeconomic Backgrounds.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (6): 588–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daugherty, Amber. 2013. “Women Know Less about Politics than Men.” The Globe and Mail, July 3. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/the-hot-button/women-know-less-about-politics-than-men-study-finds-that-goes-for-canada-too/article12947354/ (accessed September 22, 2016).Google Scholar
Davidson-Schmich, Louise K. 2006. “Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas: Evidence from the German Länder 1990–2000.” Party Politics 12 (2): 211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen A. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Elder, Laurel. 2004. “Why Women Don't Run: Explaining Women's Underrepresentation in America's Political Institutions.” Women and Politics 26 (2): 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Equal Voice. 2015. Fundamental Facts. http://www.equalvoice.ca/facts.cfm (accessed September 22, 2016.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2005. “To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 642–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2011. “Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women's Equality in Electoral Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., Lawless, Jennifer L., and Feeley, Courtney. 2001. “Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (3): 411–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, Sarah. 2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 303–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, Sarah. 2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-dynamics and Mirco-mechanisms.” Political Behaviour 36 (3): 605–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidengil, Elizabeth, Giles, Janine, and Thomas, Melanee. 2008. “The Gender Gap in Self-Perceived Understanding of Politics in Canada and the United States. Gender & Politics 4 (4): 535–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Rachael Rose. 2012. “78 Percent of Americans Frustrated by Negative Campaigns, Poll Finds.” Yahoo! News. July 14. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/the-ticket/78-percent-americans-frustrated-negative-campaigns-poll-finds-151125834.html (accessed September 22, 2016).Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny, and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2015. “A Non-Gendered Lens? Media, Voters, and Female Candidates in Contemporary Congressional Elections.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (1): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2014. “Women in National Parliaments.” http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm (accessed September 22, 2016).Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2010. “Why are Fewer Women than Men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection.” Political Studies Review 8 (2): 155–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and O'Brien, Diana Z.. 2012. “All the President's Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide.” Journal of Politics 74 (3): 840–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2009. “Sexism and Gender Bias in Election 2008: A More Complex Path for Women in Politics.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2013. Girls Just Wanna Not Run: The Gender Gap in Young Americans' Political Ambition. Washington, D.C.: Women and Politics Institute.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women's Under-Representation: Re–Evaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Becca. 1996. “Improving Memory in Old Age through Implicit Self- Stereotyping.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (6): 1092–1107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, Jeremy D., and Schmidt, Heather M.. 2004. “Gendered Political Socialization in Four Contexts: Political Interest and Values among Junior High School Students in China, Japan, Mexico, and the United States.” The Social Science Journal 41 (3): 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, Matthew S., Aronson, Joshua, and Kobrynowicz, Diane. 2006. “Stereotype Threat and the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 30 (4): 392–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2006. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn, and McGhee, Eric. 2013. “What It Takes to Win: Questioning ‘Gender Neutral’ Outcomes in U.S. House Elections.” Politics and Gender 9 (4): 439–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2008. “More Americans View Campaign as Too Negative.” http://www.people-press.org/2008/04/24/more-americans-view-campaign-as-too-negative/ (accessed September 22, 2016).Google Scholar
Pruysers, Scott, and Blais, Julie. 2014. “Anything Women Can Do Men Can Do Better: An Experiment Examining the Effects of Stereotype Threat on Political Knowledge and Efficacy.” The Social Science Journal 51 (3): 341–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinehart, Sue. 1991. “Do Women Leaders Make a Difference? Substance, Style, and Perceptions.” In Gender and Policymaking: Studies of Women in Office, ed. Dodson, Debra. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Samara. 2012. “Who's the Boss? Canadians’ Views on Their Democracy.” Samara Democracy Report #4. http://www.samaracanada.com/docs/default-source/default-document-library/sam_whostheboss.pdf?sfvrsn=16 (accessed September 22, 2016).Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. “Do Parties Know that ‘Women Win’? Party Leader Beliefs about Women's Electoral Chances.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 431–50.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira, and Dolan, Kathleen. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?” Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 485–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltzer, Richard, Newman, Jody, and Leighton, Melissa Voorhees. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigel, Roberta. 1990. “The Case for Educating Gender Equality.” In Political Socialization, Citizenship Evaluation, and Democracy, ed. Ichilov, Orit. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Eric R. A. N., and Fox, Richard L.. 2001. “The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Steven J., Steele, Claude M., and Quinn, Diane M.. 1999. “Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35 (1): 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Claude and Aronson, Joshua. 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (5): 797–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streb, Matthew J., Burrell, Barbara, Frederick, Brian, and Genovese, Michael A.. 2008. “Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (1): 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Melanee. 2012. “The Complexity Conundrum: Why Hasn't the Gender Gap in Subjective Political Competence Closed?” Canadian Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 337–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomma, Stephen. 2000. “Men Outpace Women in Quiz about Candidates and the Issues. Philly.com. http://articles.philly.com/2000-03-28/news/25604903_1_kate-kenski-political-knowledge-presidential-candidates (accessed September 22, 2016).Google Scholar
Tremblay, Manon. 1998. “Do Female MPs Substantively Represent Women? A Study of Legislative Behaviour in Canada's 35th Parliament.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 435–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Manon. 2007. “Democracy, Representation, and Women: A Comparative Analysis.” Democratization 14 (4): 533–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, Linda. 2007. “Gender, Political Leadership and Media Visibility: Globe and Mail Coverage of Conservative Party of Canada Leadership Contests.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 969–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, Jill. 1997. Reinventing Political Science: A Feminist Approach. Halifax: Fernwood.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, Wiseman, Alan E., and Wittmer, Dana E.. 2013. “When are Women More Effective Lawmakers than Men?” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 326–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wauters, Bram, and Pilet, Jean-Benoit. 2016. “Electing Women as Party Leaders: Does the Selectorate Matter?” In The Politics of Party Leadership: A Cross-national Perspective, ed. Cross, William and Pilet, Jean Benoit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wigfield, Allan, Eccles, Jacquelynne S., and Pintrich, Paul R.. 1996. “Development between the Ages of 11 and 25.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology, ed. Berliner, David C. and Calfee, Robert C.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
World Values Survey Wave 6 2010–2014 Official Aggregate v.20150418. World Values Survey Association (www.worldvaluessurvey.org). Aggregate File Producer: Asep/JDS, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Young, Lisa. 2009. “Women (Not) in Politics: Women's Electoral Participation.” In Canadian Politics, ed. Bickerton, James and Gagnon, Alain. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pruysers and Blais supplementary material

Pruysers and Blais supplementary material

Download Pruysers and Blais supplementary material(File)
File 75.2 KB