Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:54:04.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Activism in an Era of Partisan Polarization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2017

Michael T. Heaney
Michael T. Heaney*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Contentious Politics in the United States: What Role for Political Scientists?
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , October 2017 , pp. 1000 - 1003
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blee, Kathleen. 2012. Democracy in the Making. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blum, Rachel. 2017. “What Donald Trump’s Rhetoric Borrows from the Tea Party.” Mischiefs of Faction (February 9). Available at www.vox.com/mischiefs-of-faction/2017/2/9/14552930/trump-tea-party-rhetoric-immigrants-liberal-media. Accessed March 18, 2017.Google Scholar
Dunlap, Riley E., McCright, Aaron M., and Yarosh, Jerrod H.. 2016. “The Political Divide on Climate Change.” Environment 58 (5): 4–23.Google Scholar
Fisher, Dana R. 2017. “The Women’s March Was Only the Beginning.” Contexts Blog (January 26). Available at https://contexts.org/blog/the-womens-march-was-only-the-beginning. Accessed June 4, 2017.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jo. 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101 (3): 327–56.Google Scholar
Frymer, Paul. 2010. Uneasy Alliances. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Heaney, Michael T. 2016. “Bernie Sanders and the Occupy Wall Street Wing of the Democratic Party.” Mobilizing Ideas (September 29). Available at https://mobilizingideas.wordpress.com/2016/09/29/bernie-sanders-and-the-occupy-wall-street-wing-of-the-democratic-party. Accessed March 18, 2017.Google Scholar
Heaney, Michael T. 2017. “Transcending Partisanship in the Age of Trump.” Democracy: A Journal of Ideas (March 13). Available at http://democracyjournal.org/arguments/transcending-partisanship-in-the-age-of-trump. Accessed June 4, 2017.Google Scholar
Heaney, Michael T., and Rojas, Fabio. 2015. Party in the Street: The Antiwar Movement and the Democratic Party after 9/11. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karol, David. 2015. “Party Activists, Interest Groups, and Polarization in American Politics.” In American Gridlock, ed. Thurber, James A. and Yoshinaka, Antoine, 68–85. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., Green, John C., Herrera, Richard, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review 104 (2): 324–46.Google Scholar
Lichterman, Paul. 1995. “Piecing Together Multicultural Community.” Social Problems 42 (4): 513–32.Google Scholar
Singal, Jesse. 2016. “Why Some Protests Succeed While Others Fail.” New York Magazine (November 20). Available at http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/11/how-should-trump-protesters-organize-themselves.html. Accessed March 20, 2017.Google Scholar
Smucker, Jonathan Matthew. 2017. Hegemony How-To: A Roadmap for Radicals. Chico, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar
Truman, David B. 1971. The Governmental Process, second edition. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Williamson, Vanessa, Skocpol, Theda, and Coggin, John. 2011. “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 25–43.Google Scholar