Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:20:58.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Azidosilane Treatments of Wood and Cellulose Fiber Surfaces on Adhesion to Polypropylene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Paul C. Kolosick
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, 1415 Johnson Drive, Madison, WI 53706
C.T. Scott
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Products Laboratory, 1 Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53705
J.A. Koutsky
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, 1415 Johnson Drive, Madison, WI 53706
G.E. Myers
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Products Laboratory, 1 Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53705
Get access

Abstract

Wood strip surfaces (Aspen and Birch) and cellulose fibers (Birch, pulped paper fibers) were treated with azidosilane coupling agent, via immersion in methylene chloride and methanol solutions respectively, and then subsequently dried. Polypropylene films were compression molded to the wood surfaces and peel forces were measured. The treated cellulose fibers were suspended and mixed with polypropylene fibers in water, formed into thin sheets by wet forming, dried, and compression molded to melt the polypropylene.

Treated wood surfaces gave two to six times the dry peel force versus untreated wood surfaces. However, the wet peel force of treated wood degraded to that of untreated wood. The elongation, fail stress, and tensile energy absorption of treated molded sheets were all increased over the untreated fibers for both dry and wet testing; the wet-tested properties were especially enhanced by the silane treatment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dalvag, H., Klason, C. and Stromvall, H-E., Intern. J. Polymeric Mater. 11, 9 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Kolpak, F.J.. SAMPE Quarterly. 18, 21 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Box, G.E.P, Hunter, W.G. and Hunter, J.S., Statistics for Experimenters, (Wiley and Sons, New York 1978), ch 10.Google Scholar
4. Sam, L., private communication, 1987.Google Scholar
5. Mengel, W.A., private communication, 1988.Google Scholar
6. Scheller, B., private communication, 1988.Google Scholar
7. Wong, H., private communication, 1988.Google Scholar
8. Plueddemann, E.P., in Interfaces in Polymer, Ceramic, and Metal Matrix Composites, edited by Ishida, H. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1988). p. 17.Google Scholar