Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:04:26.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Contribution of International Institutions to Domestic Reparation for International Crimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Andre Nollkaemper
Andre Nollkaemper*
Affiliation:
Amsterdam Center for International Law, University of Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Impact of International Criminal Proceedings on National Prosecutions in Mass Atrocity Cases
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 103 , 2009 , pp. 203 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, at 4, UN Doc. S/2004/625 (Aug. 3, 2004).

2 See Nollkaemper, André, Multilevel Accountability in International Law: A Case Study of the Aftermath of Srebrenica, in The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignity, Supremacy, and Subsidiarity 345-367 (Shany, Y. & Broude, T. eds., 2008)Google Scholar.

3 Survivors and Post-Genocide Justice in Rwanda, Their Experiences, Perspectives and Hopes, African Rights and Redress, Nov. 2008, at <http://www.redress.org/reports/Rwanda%20Survivors%2031%20Oct%2008.pdf>, 100-101.

4 Orozco, Julián Guerrero and Goetz, Mariana, Reparations for Victims in Colombia: Colombia’s Law on Justice and Peace, in Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity ch. 17 (Ferstman, Carla & Goetz, Mariana & Stephens, Alan, eds., 2009)Google Scholar.

5 Rechtbank’s-Gravenhage, LJN BI2444 (Mar. 23, 2009), available at <www.rechtspraak.nl>.

6 African Rights and Redress Report, supra note 3, 100-101.

7 ICC Statute Art. 75(2).

8 Kudła v. Poland [GC], App. No. 30210/96, Judgment, ¶ 152 (Oct. 26, 2000).

9 Burke-White, Wiliam, Implementing a Policy of Positive Complementarity in the Rome System of Justice, 38 1 Criminal Law Forum 59-85 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 See <http://www2.icc-cpi.int/Menus/ICC/Structure+of+the+Court/Victims?/Trust+Fund+for+Victims/CurrentProjects/>.

11 Doğan and others v. Turkey, App. Nos. 2203-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, Judgment (June 29, 2004).

12 Doğan and others v. Turkey, App. Nos. 2203-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, Judgment (Just Satisfaction) (July 13, 2006).

13 Icyer v. Turkey, App. No. 18888/02, Admissibility Decision, ¶ 85 (Jan. 12, 2006).

14 International Mass Claims Processes: Legal and Practical Perspectives 504 (Holtzmann, H.M. & Kristjansdottir, E. eds., 2007)Google Scholar.