Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:30:28.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resolving management conflicts: could agricultural land provide the answer for an endangered species in a habitat classified as a World Heritage Site?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

REBECCA K. SMITH
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
EMMA RYAN
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
EMMA MORLEY
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
RUSSELL A. HILL*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
*
*Correspondence: Dr Russell Hill Tel: +44 191 334 1601 Fax: +44 191 334 1615 e-mail: r.a.hill@durham.ac.uk

Summary

The short-interval fires required to promote grazing for large herbivores within the Cape Floristic Region World Heritage Site are detrimental to plant diversity. At the same time, longer interval fires significantly reduce graze quality. Conservation managers thus face an enormous challenge when the herbivores are also a conservation priority, since the competing conservation objectives are difficult to reconcile. Population growth rates of genetically important populations of endangered Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra) are low or declining following management focused on their fynbos habitat. Investigation of spatial and temporal habitat use and the diet of Cape mountain zebra, focusing on the use of land historically converted to agricultural grassland within fynbos in De Hoop Nature Reserve (South Africa), determined factors limiting populations and facilitated development of management strategies. Zebras selected grassland over other habitat types, despite grassland accounting for only a small proportion of the reserve. Grasses also made up the greatest proportion of diet for zebras throughout the year. Time spent on grasslands increased with grass height and was likely to have been influenced by grass protein levels. It is likely that grazing resources are a limiting factor for zebra, and so options for improving and/or increasing grassland at De Hoop should be considered. Translocation of surplus males to other conservation areas, reductions in other herbivore populations and targeted burns to increase grassland availability all offer short-term solutions. However, the acquisition of agricultural grassland adjacent to reserves is likely to be a viable long-term management strategy for this and other genetically important Cape mountain zebra populations. Low conservation priority habitats, such as farmland, should be considered for other management conflicts, as they have the potential to play a vital role in conservation.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, R.H.V. (1970) The use of the herb layer by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti. In: Animal Populations in Relation to their Food Resources, ed. Watson, A., pp. 111123. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, R. & Coe, M.J. (1992) The relationship between soil factors, grass nutrients and the foraging behaviour of wildebeest and zebra. Oecologia 90: 422428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Laake, J.L., Borchers, D.L. & Thomas, L. (2004). Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castley, G., Lloyd, P.H. & Moodley, Y. (2002) Cape mountain zebra Equus zebra zebra taxon data sheet. IUCN Conservation Assessment Management Plan, Randburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
Dallwitz, M. J. (1980) A general system for coding taxonomic descriptions. Taxon 29: 41–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demment, M.W. & Van Soest, P.J. (1985) A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and non-ruminant herbivores. American Naturalist 125: 641672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2000) Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows. London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Grobler, J.H. (1983) Feeding habits of the Cape mountain zebra Equus zebra zebra 1758. Koedoe 26: 159168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, L. (1970) Methods of morphological diet micro-analysis in rodents. Oikos 21: 255266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiby, L. & Krishna, M.B. (2001) Line transect sampling from a curving path. Biometrics 57: 727731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, R.A. (2009) Is isolation the major genetic concern for endangered equids? Animal Conservation 12: 518519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R.A., Barrett, L., Gaynor, D., Weingrill, T., Dixon, P., Payne, H. & Henzi, S.P. (2003) Day length, latitude and behavioural (in)flexibility in baboons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 53: 278286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holechek, J.L., Vavra, M. & Pieper, R.D. (1982) Botanical composition determination of range herbivore diets: a review. Journal of Range Management 3: 309315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homolka, M. (1987) Problems associated with investigations into the diet of the European hare. Folia Zoologica 36: 193202.Google Scholar
Kotze, J.D.F. & Fairall, N. (2006) Using Landsat TM imagery to map fynbos plant communities: a case study. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 36: 7587.Google Scholar
Kraaij, T. & Novellie, P.A. (2010) Habitat selection by large herbivores in relation to fire at Bontebok National Park (1974–2009): the effects of management changes. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 27: 2127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, P.H. & Rasa, O.A.E. (1989) Status, reproductive success and fitness in Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra). Behaviour, Ecology and Sociobiology 25: 411420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, E.J., Campbell, B.M., Cowling, R.M., Bossi, L., Jarman, M.L. & Boucher, C. (1984) A description of major vegetation categories in and adjacent to the Fynbos biome. South African National Scientific Programmes Report 83: 124.Google Scholar
Moodley, Y. & Harley, E.H. (2005) Population structuring in mountain zebras (Equus zebra): the molecular consequences of divergent demographic histories. Conservation Genetics 6: 953968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musil, C.F. (1993) Effect of invasive Australian acacias on the regeneration, growth and nutrient chemistry of South African lowland fynbos. Journal of Applied Ecology 30: 361372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustart, P., Cowling, R. & Albertyn, J. (1997) Southern Overberg: South African Wild Flower Guide 8. Cape Town, South Africa: Botanical Society of South Africa.Google Scholar
Novellie, P. & Kraaij, T. (2010) Evaluation of Themeda triandra as an indicator for monitoring the effects of grazing and fire in the Bontebok National Park. Koedoe 52: 15. doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v52i1.977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novellie, P.A. & Strydom, G. (1987) Monitoring the response of vegetation to use by large herbivores: an assessment of some techniques. African Journal of Wildlife Research 17: 109117.Google Scholar
Novellie, P.A. & Winkler, A. (1993) A simple index of habitat suitability for Cape mountain zebras. Koedoe 36: 5359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novellie, P.A., Fourie, L.J., Kok, O.B. & Van Der Westhuizen, M.C. (1988) Factors affecting the seasonal movements of Cape mountain zebras in the Mountain Zebra National Park. South African Journal of Zoology 23: 1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novellie, P.A., Lindeque, M., Lindeque, P., Lloyd, P. & Koen, J. (2002) Status and action plan for the mountain zebra (Equus zebra). In: Equids: Zebras, Asses, and Horses: Status, Survey and Conservation Action Plan, ed. Moehlman, P., pp. 2842. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Novellie, P., Millar, P.S. & Lloyd, P.H. (1996) The use of VORTEX simulation models in a long term programme of re-introduction of an endangered large mammal, the Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra). Acta Œcologica 17: 657671.Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, N. (1982) Factors influencing the transfer of plant products into large herbivore populations. In: Ecology of Tropical Savannas, ed. Huntley, B.J. & Walker, B.H., pp. 359404, Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penzhorn, B.L. (1982 a) Habitat selection by Cape mountain zebra in the Mountain Zebra National Park. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 12: 4854.Google Scholar
Penzhorn, B.L. (1982 b) Home range sizes of Cape mountain zebras Equus zebra zebra in the Mountain Zebra National Park. Koedoe 25: 103108.Google Scholar
Prather, J.W., Noss, R.F. & Sisk, T.D. (2008) Real versus perceived conflicts between restoration of ponderosa pine forests and conservation of the Mexican spotted owl. Forest Policy and Economics 10: 140150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, B.J. (1984) Facts from faeces. Mammal Review 14: 7997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, K., Rumiz, D.I. & Taber, A.B. (2004) Estimating brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira and M. americana) abundance by dung pellet counts and other indices in seasonal Chiquitano forest habitats of Santa Cruz, Bolivia. European Journal of Wildlife Research 50: 161167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roux, P.W. (1963) The descending-point method of vegetation survey. A point-sampling method for the measurement of semi-open grasslands and Karoo vegetation in South Africa. South African Journal of Agricultural Science 6: 273288.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A.R.E. (1974) The natural regulation of buffalo populations in East Africa IV. The food supply as a regulating factor, and competition. East African Wildlife Journal 12: 291311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A.R.E., Dublin, H. & Borner, M. (1985) Population regulation of Serengeti wildebeest: a test of the food hypothesis. Oecologia 65: 266268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R.K., Marais, A., Chadwick, P., Lloyd, P.H. & Hill, R.A. (2008) Monitoring and management of the endangered Cape mountain zebra Equus zebra zebra in the Western Cape, South Africa. African Journal of Ecology 46: 207213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulé, M.E. (1987) Where Do We Go From Here? Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D.R.M. (1967) Analysis of plant epidermis in faeces: a technique for studying the food preferences of grazing herbivores. Journal of Applied Ecology 66: 574577.Google Scholar
Van Wilgen, B.W., Richardson, D.M. & Seydack, A.H.W. (1994) Managing fynbos for biodiveristy: constraints and options in a fire-prone environment. South African Journal of Science 90: 322329.Google Scholar
Watson, L.H. & Chadwick, P. (2007) Management of Cape mountain zebra in the Kammanassie Nature Reserve, South Africa. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 37: 3139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, L.H., Odendaal, H.E., Barry, T.J. & Pietersen, J. (2005). Population viability of Cape mountain zebra in Gamka Mountain Nature Reserve, South Africa: the influence of habitat and fire. Biological Conservation 122: 173180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, A. (1992) The feeding ecology of the Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra Linn. 1758) in the Mountain Zebra National Park. M.Sc. thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.Google Scholar
Wolfe, A., Whelan, J. & Hayden, T.J. (1996) The diet of the mountain hare (Lepus timidus hibernicus) on coastal grassland. Journal of Zoology 240: 804810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, Fourth edition. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Smith Supplementary Material

Smith Supplementary Appendix

Download Smith Supplementary Material(File)
File 52.2 KB