Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:43:36.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Changes in Federal Welfare Legislation and the Impact of Regional Economic Growth on Poverty, Dependency and Work Incentives: Some Findings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Richard F. Bieker
Richard F. Bieker*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Delaware State College, Dover, Delaware 19901
Get access

Abstract

Regional economic growth based on private sector job creation is often proposed as a policy for reducing the incidence of regional unemployment, poverty and dependency. One factor that could limit the impact of economic growth on the employment and poverty status of an area's indigenous population is the area's public assistance system. This study evaluates the impact of recent changes in federal welfare legislation (HR 3982) on the work incentives and the poverty and dependency status of Delaware female household heads receiving Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) assistance. Specifically, the study estimates the implicit marginal tax rates that such household heads would face by accepting employment in private sector jobs to which they are potential entrants under the pre and post HR 3982 conditions. In addition, the study examines the effect of the HR 3982 changes on the poverty and dependency status of such households.

Type
Research Article
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , April 1985 , pp. 26 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Appreciation is expressed to Dr. Joachim Elterich and an anonymous reviewer for their suggestions.

References

Anderson, W. M. Locke. “Trickling Down: The Relationship between Economic Growth and the Extent of Poverty among American Families.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 78 (1964):511–524.Google Scholar
Bieker, Richard F. An Economic Analysis of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program. SER Report 2. Dover, Delaware: Delaware State College, Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 1978.Google Scholar
Bieker, Richard F. “Work and Welfare: An Analysis Based on AFDC Participation Rates in Delaware.” Social Science Quarterly 62 (1981):169–176.Google Scholar
Delaware Department of Health and Social Services. Medicaid Statistical Report: 1979. New Castle, Delaware: Division of Planning, Research and Evaluation. 1979a.Google Scholar
Delaware Department of Health and Social Services. Public Assistance Grants—Statistical Report: 1979. New Castle, Delaware: Division of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 1979b.Google Scholar
Delaware Department of Labor, Employment, Hours and Earnings: 1979. Wilmington, Delaware: Division of Research, 1979.Google Scholar
Doolittle, Frederick et al. “The Mirage of Welfare Reform.” The Public Interest 47 (1977):62–87.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry L. and Hausman, Leonard J. “Is Compulsory Work for Welfare Recipients Manageable?” Waltham, Mass.: Brandeis University, Heller Graduate School, 1978.Google Scholar
Hausman, Jerry A. “Labor Supply.” In How Taxes Affect Economic Behavior. Ed. by Aaron, H. J. and Pechman, J. A. Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1981.Google Scholar
Hausman, Leonard. “Potential for Self-Support among AFDC and AFDC-UP Recipients.” Southern Economic Journal 3 (1969):60–66.Google Scholar
Kolodrubetz, Walter W. “Employee Benefit Plans: 1973,” Social Security Bulletin 38 (1975):17–24.Google Scholar
Peterkin, Betty. The Measure of Poverty: Food Plans for Poverty Measurement. Hyattsville, Maryland: Agricultural Research Service.Google Scholar
Reder, M. W. “The Theory of Occupational Wage Differentials.” American Economic Review 45 (1955):833–852.Google Scholar
Smith, Eldon D. “How New Industry Affects Rural Areas: A Review of Research.” Lexington Kentucky: University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics, n.d.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Money Income and Poverty Status of Families and Persons in the United States. Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 125. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. 1977 Recipient Characteristic Study: Delaware. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.Google Scholar
Venti, Steven. Sources of AFDC Caseload Growth in Massachusetts. SWRRI Publication 22. Boston: Boston College, Social Welfare Regional Research Institute, 1975.Google Scholar