Book contents
- The Cambridge World History
- The Cambridge World History
- The Cambridge World History
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Table
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Global developments
- Part II Eurasian commonalities
- Part III Growing interactions
- 9 Trade and commerce across Afro-Eurasia
- 10 European and Mediterranean trade networks
- 11 Trading partners across the Indian Ocean: the making of maritime communities
- 12 Technology and innovation within expanding webs of exchange
- 13 The transmission of science and philosophy
- 14 Pastoral nomadic migrations and conquests
- Part IV Expanding religious systems
- Part V State formations
- Index
- References
14 - Pastoral nomadic migrations and conquests
from Part III - Growing interactions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Book contents
- The Cambridge World History
- The Cambridge World History
- The Cambridge World History
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Table
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Global developments
- Part II Eurasian commonalities
- Part III Growing interactions
- 9 Trade and commerce across Afro-Eurasia
- 10 European and Mediterranean trade networks
- 11 Trading partners across the Indian Ocean: the making of maritime communities
- 12 Technology and innovation within expanding webs of exchange
- 13 The transmission of science and philosophy
- 14 Pastoral nomadic migrations and conquests
- Part IV Expanding religious systems
- Part V State formations
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter analyzes general causes for pastoral nomadic migrations. It examines three parts of Afro-Eurasia: the Eurasian steppes, semi-deserts and deserts; the Near and Middle East and North Africa; and India. The chapter discusses the economic, sociopolitical, and institutional effects of the nomadic migrations and conquests. In all, the nomads had to adapt not only to a specific natural environment but also to external socio-political, economic, and cultural environments. During the Middle Millennium, there were three major waves of nomadic migration in the Eurasian steppes and adjacent regions. For ecological and historical reasons, in the Islamic heartland nomads and sedentaries were linked to each other than in some other regions like China, India, or East Europe. In particular, language shifts and the spread of Turkic languages from East Siberia to the Middle Volga region and to the Balkans were connected with the migrations, conquests, and/or political dominance of the nomads.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge World History , pp. 359 - 382Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Further reading
Agadzhanow, S. G. Der Staat der Seldschukiden und Mittelasien im 11.–12. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Reinhold Schletzer Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
Allsen, Thomas T. Culture and Conquest in Mongol Eurasia. Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allsen, Thomas T. Mongol Imperialism: The Policies of the Grand Qan Möngke in China, Russia, and the Islamic Lands, 1251–1259. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Amitai-Preiss, Reuven. Mongols and Mamluks: The Mamluk-Ilkhanid War, 1260–1281. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Barfield, Thomas J. The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Barthold, V. V. Turkestan v epokhu mongol'skogo nashestviia (Turkestan in the Times of the Mongol Invasion). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo vostochnoi literatury, 1963.Google Scholar
Biran, Michal. The Empire of the Qara Khitai in Eurasian History: Between China and the Islamic World. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Bosworth, C. E. “The Political and Dynastic History of the Iranian World (A.D. 1000–1217),” in Boyle, J. A (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran, vol. v. Cambridge University Press, 1968: 1–202.Google Scholar
Brett, M. “The Central Lands of North Africa and Sicily, Until the Beginning of the Almohad Period,” in Fierro, Maribel (ed.), The New Cambridge History of Islam, vol. ii. Cambridge University Press, 2010: 48–65.Google Scholar
Endicott-West, Elizabeth. “Aspects of Khitan Liao and Mongolian Yüan Imperial Rule: A Comparative Perspective,” in Seaman, Gary and Marks, Daniel (eds.), Rulers from the Steppe: State Formation on the Eurasian Periphery. Los Angeles, CA: Ethnographics Press, University of Southern California, 1991: 199–222.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. J. “The Eastern Maghrib and Central Sudan,” in Olivier, Roland (ed.), The Cambridge History of Africa, vol. iii. Cambridge University Press, 1977: 232–330.Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B. “Imperial Ideology and the Sources of Political Unity amongst the Pre-Chinggisid Nomads in Western Eurasia,” Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi 2(1982): 37–76.Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B. An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples: Ethnogenesis and State-formation in Medieval and Early Modern Eurasia and the Middle East. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1992.Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B. Khazar Studies: An Historico-Philological Inquiry into the Origins of the Khazars Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1980.Google Scholar
Khazanov, Anatoly M. Nomads and the Outside World, 2nd edn. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Khazanov, Anatoly M. “Nomads in the History of the Sedentary World,” in Khazanov, and Wink, (eds.), Nomads in the Sedentary World, 1–23.Google Scholar
Khazanov, Anatoly M. and Wink, André, eds. Nomads in the Sedentary World. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kliashtornyi, S. G. Drevnetiurkskie runicheskie pamiatniki kak istochnik po istorii Srednei Azii (Ancient Turkic Runic Inscriptions as a Source in Study of the History of Central Asia). Moscow: Nauka, 1964.Google Scholar
Kliashtornyi, S. G. and Savinov, D. G.. Stepnye imperii drevnei Evrazii (The Steppe Empires of Ancient Eurasia). St Petersburg State University, 2005.Google Scholar
Mackerras, Colin. The Uighur Empire According to the T'ang Dynastic Histories: A Study in Sino–Uighur Relations, 744–840. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Peacock, Andrew C. S. Early Seljūk History: A New Interpretation. London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Poncet, J. “Le mythe de la catastrophe hilalienne” (“The Myth of the Hilalian Catastrophy”), Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 22 (1967): 1099–120.Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, András. Hungarians and Europe in the Early Middle Ages. Budapest: Central European University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Tikhvinsky, S. L. (ed). Tataro-mongoly v Azii i Evrope (The Tataro-Mongols in Asia and Europe), 2nd edn. Moscow: Nauka, 1977.Google Scholar
Wink, André. “India and the Turko-Mongol Frontier,” in Khazanov, and Wink, (eds.), Nomads in the Sedentary World, 211–33.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 3
- Cited by