Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:31:33.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Developments in Field Studies of Low Activity Waste Glass Corrosion and Contaminant Transport

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

B. P. McGrail ,
D. H. Bacon ,
P. D. Meyer ,
M. I. Ojovan ,
D. M. Strachan ,
N. V. Ojovan  and
I. V. Startceva
B. P. McGrail
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, pete.mcgrail@pnl.gov
D. H. Bacon
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, pete.mcgrail@pnl.gov
P. D. Meyer
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, pete.mcgrail@pnl.gov
M. I. Ojovan
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, UK
D. M. Strachan
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, pete.mcgrail@pnl.gov
N. V. Ojovan
Affiliation:
Scientific and Industrial Association “Radon”, Moscow, Russia
I. V. Startceva
Affiliation:
Scientific and Industrial Association “Radon”, Moscow, Russia
Get access

Abstract

Performance assessment calculations for low-activity waste glass to be disposed at the Hanford site depend on simulations of long-term glass corrosion behavior and contaminant transport that are being performed via reactive chemical transport modeling. Confidence in the underlying physical and chemical processes that are being approximated by the computer model could be significantly enhanced through carefully-controlled field testing, which includes studies of buried ancient glasses. Field tests with simulated low-activity waste glasses have been initiated on the Hanford site and at the Ballidon site in the United Kingdom. In addition, a joint PNNL – SIA RADON research project has been initiated to analyze a unique data set collected over 12+ years during a Russian in-situ testing program with actual low-activity waste glass. The glasses buried at Hanford are scaled down cylinders (45 kg mass) and include a representative glass composition for Hanford low-activity waste and a glass designed to be highly reactive. Each glass was doped with chemical analog tracers (Re, Se, and Mo). Design of the lysimeter test facility and sampling locations were done with aid of predictive calculations performed with the STORM code. These same glasses were also buried at Ballidon but in the form of small glass coupons. The coupons will be retrieved over a period of several years for detailed analysis along with core samples of the surrounding limestone, which will be analyzed for contaminant transport profiles. Analysis of porewater from underneath the Russian burial site ha s been compared with modeling calculations. Good agreement between the model and the field data has been obtained so far using estimated parameters for the glass corrosion. Independent laboratory tests are in progress to parameterize the STORM model for quantitative comparisons.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 757: Symposium II – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVI , 2002 , II2.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mann, F.M., Puigh, R.J. II, Finfrock, S.H., Freeman, E.J., Khaleel, R., Bacon, D.H., Bergeron, M.P., McGrail, B.P., Wurstner, S.K., Burgard, K., Root, W.R., and LaMont, P.E., Hanford Immobilized Low-Activity Tank Waste Performance Assessment: 2001 Version, DOE/ORP-2000–24 Rev. 0, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland, Washington (2001).Google Scholar
2. Burbank, D.A., Conceptual Design Report for the Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Disposal Facility, Project W-520, RPP-7908, Revision 0, CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc., Richland, Washington (2001).Google Scholar
3. Aagaard, P. and Helgeson, H.C., Am. J. Sci. 282, 237–285 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Bacon, D.H., White, M.D., and McGrail, B.P., Subsurface Transport Over Reactive Multiphases (STORM): A General, Coupled Nonisothermal Multiphase Flow, Reactive Transport, and Porous Medium Alteration Simulator, Version 2, User's Guide, PNNL-13108, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington (2000).Google Scholar
5. McGrail, B.P., Bacon, D.H., Icenhower, J.P., Mann, F.M., Puigh, R.J., Schaef, H.T., and Matti-god, S.V., J. Nuc. Mat. 298 (1–2), 95–111 (2001).Google Scholar
6. Oreskes, N., Shraderfrechette, K., and Belitz, K., Science 263 (5147), 641–646 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Hench, L.L. and Wilson, M.J.R., J. Nuc. Mat. 136 (2–3), 218–228 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Wicks, G.G., J. Nuc. Mat. 298 (1–2), 78–85 (2001).Google Scholar
9. McGrail, B.P., Icenhower, J.P., Bacon, D.H., Schaef, H.T., Martin, P.F., Rodriguez, E.A., and Steele, J.L., Low-Activity Waste Glass Studies: FY2001 Summary Report, PNNL-13761, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington (2001).Google Scholar
10. Vienna, J.D., Hrma, P., Jiricka, A., Smith, D.E., Lorier, T.H., Reamer, I.A., and Schulz, R.L., Hanford Immobilized LAW Product Acceptance Testing: Tanks Focus Area Results, PNNL-13744, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington (2001).Google Scholar
11. McMillan, P. and Piriou, B., Bulletin De Mineralogie 106 (1–2), 57–75 (1983).Google Scholar
12. You, J.L., Jiang, G.C., and Xu, K.D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 282 (1), 125–131 (2001).Google Scholar
13. McGrail, B.P., Icenhower, J.P., Shuh, D.K., Liu, P., Darab, J.G., Baer, D.R., Thevuthasen, S., Shutthanandan, V., Engelhard, M.H., Booth, C.H., and Nachimuthu, P., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 296 (1–2), 10–26 (2001).Google Scholar
14. Gee, G.W. and Jones, T.L., Lysimeters at the Hanford Site: Present and Future Needs, PNL-5578, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington (1985).Google Scholar
15. Rockhold, M., Estimation of Natural Ground Water Recharge for the Performance Assessment of a Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility at the Hanford Site, PNL-10508, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington (1995).Google Scholar
16. Bacon, D.H. and McGrail, B.P., Waste Form Release Calculations for the 2001 Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Performance Assessment, PNNL-13369, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington (2001).Google Scholar
17. Fayer, M.J., Murphy, E.M., Downs, J.L., Khan, F.O., Lindenmeier, C.W., and Bjornstad, B.N., Recharge Data Package for the Immobilized Low-Activity Waste 2001 Performance Assessment, PNNL-13033, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington (1999).Google Scholar
18. Sobolev, I.A., Barinov, A.S., Ojovan, M.I., Ojovan, N.V., Startceva, I.V., Tchuikova, G.N., Golubeva, Z.I., and Timopheeva, A.V., Long-Term Tests Of Low And Intermediate Level Waste Packages Under Field And Experimental Repository Conditions, IAEA-9744/R, Scientific and Industrial Association <Radon>, Moscow, Russia (2001).,+Moscow,+Russia+(2001).>Google Scholar
19. Ojovan, M.I., Ojovan, I.V.N.V., Startceva, G.N., Tchuikova, Z.I., Golubeva, , and Barinov, A.S., J. Nucl. Mat. 298, 174–179 (2001).Google Scholar
20. Arya, L.M. and Paris, J.F., Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45, 1023–1030 (1981).Google Scholar
21. Campbell, G.S., in Soil Physics with BASIC: Transport Models for Soil-Plant Systems, (Elsevier, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
22. van Genuchten, M.T., RETC.F77: Program to Analyze Observed Soil Water Retention and Hydraulic Conductivity Data, U.S. Salinity Laboratory Special Report, Riverside, California (1985).Google Scholar
23. Wolery, T.J. and Daveler, S.A., EQ6, A Computer Program for Reaction Path Modeling of Aqueous Geochemical Systems: Theoretical Manual, User's Guide, and Related Documentation (Version 7.0), UCRL-MA-110662 PT IV, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California (1992).Google Scholar
24. McGrail, B.P., Bacon, D.H., Icenhower, J.P., Ebert, W.L., Martin, P.F., Schaef, H.T., and Rodriguez, E.A., Waste Form Release Data Package for the 2001 Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Performance Assessment, PNNL-13043, Rev. 2, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington (2001).Google Scholar