Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:00:31.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-Destructive Evaluation of the Interface in Reinforced Concrete Using Phase Measurement Interferometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Masoud Ghandehari
Affiliation:
Northwestern Univ, Dept of Civil Eng, Evanston Illinois;
Sridhar Krishnaswamy
Affiliation:
Northwestern Univ, Dept of Mechanical Eng, Evanston Illinois;
Surendra Shah
Affiliation:
Northwestern Univ, Dept of Civil Eng, Evanston Illinois.
Get access

Abstract

Studying the behavior of steel and concrete as a composite is of fundamental importance to the understanding of the cracking of reinforced concrete structures. In this article, a technique leading toward the development of a constitutive model for the interaction of steel and concrete is described. Experiments are based on pull-out specimens, where the shear stress and the two displacement components at the interface are measured. Phase Measurement Interferometry is used for accurate surface displacement measurement, and crack growth detection. The normal stress is then deduced using the measured crack length and crack opening displacements, along with a fracture mechanics based numerical simulation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jenq, Y.S. Shah, S.P. (1985), “Two-parameter Fracture Model for Concrete”, J. Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE, 111(10)Google Scholar
2. Creath, K. (1988), “Phase Measurement Interferometry Technique”, Progress in Optics XXVI ed. WolfGoogle Scholar
3. Jones, R., Wykes, C. (1989), “Holographic and Speckle Interferometry” Cambridge Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
4. FRANC2D (1995), “A Two Dimensional Crack Propagation Simulator” V2.7 Cornell Univ.Google Scholar
5. Gopalaratnam, V.S. Shah, S.P. (1985), “Softening Response of Plain Concrete in Direct Tension” ACI Journal, May-JuneGoogle Scholar
6. Hawkins, Yon J. Kobayashi, N.M. , A.S. (1991), “Numerical simulation of mode I dynamic fracture of concrete”, J. Eng. Mech. 117(7)Google Scholar