Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:35:41.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resource partitioning by two syntopic sister species of butterflyfish (Chaetodontidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2017

Ana M.R. Liedke ,
Roberta M. Bonaldo ,
Bárbara Segal ,
Carlos E.L. Ferreira ,
Lucas T. Nunes ,
Ana P. Burigo ,
Sonia Buck ,
Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos  and
Sergio R. Floeter
Ana M.R. Liedke*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Roberta M. Bonaldo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil Grupo de História Natural de Vertebrados, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
Bárbara Segal
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil Instituto Coral Vivo, Arraial d'Ajuda, Porto Seguro, Brazil
Carlos E.L. Ferreira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Marinha, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
Lucas T. Nunes
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Ana P. Burigo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Sonia Buck
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil
Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Ecologia de Movimento e Populações, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
Sergio R. Floeter
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A.M.R. Liedke, Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil email: amrliedke@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Resource partitioning is considered one of the main processes driving diversification in ecological communities because it allows coexistence among closely related and ecologically equivalent species. We combined three complementary approaches, i.e. the evaluation of foraging behaviour, diet composition and nutritional condition (RNA:DNA ratio), to assess feeding by two closely related (sister) butterflyfishes that are syntopic in Puerto Rico. Chaetodon capistratus had a higher abundance and higher bite rate and selected octocorals and hard corals for feeding, whereas Chaetodon striatus fed preferentially on sandy substrates. Cnidarians and polychaetes were the most representative diet items for both species, but C. capistratus preferred the former (Feeding Index of 74.3%) and C. striatus the latter (Feeding Index of 60.4%). Similar RNA:DNA ratios for both species suggest that, although they differ in feeding rates and diet, C. capistratus and C. striatus have similar nutritional fitness. Therefore, these species are both zoobenthivores but show clear differences in their substrate selection. The differences in the use of foraging substrate by C. capistratus and C. striatus, despite their close phylogenetic relationship and similar diets, suggest that these species coexist by resource partitioning.

Keywords

Chaetodontidaeco-occurring speciesdietfeedinghabitat partitioningnutritional conditionreef fishstomach contents
Type
Review
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 98 , Issue 7 , November 2018 , pp. 1767 - 1773
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aebischer, N.J., Robertson, P.A. and Kenward, R.E. (1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74, 1313–1325.Google Scholar
Alwany, M.A., Thaler, E. and Stachowitsch, M. (2003) Food selection in two corallivorous butterflyfishes, Chaetodon austriacus and C. trifascialis, in the Northern Red Sea. Marine Ecology 24, 165–177.Google Scholar
Begon, M., Townsend, C.R. and Harper, J.L. (1996) Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Behrens, M.D. and Lafferty, K.D. (2007) Temperature and diet effects on omnivorous fish performance: implications for the latitudinal diversity gradient in herbivorous fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 64, 867–873.Google Scholar
Bellwood, D.R., Wainwright, P.C., Fulton, C.J. and Hoey, A.S. (2006) Functional versatility supports coral reef biodiversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 273, 101–107.Google Scholar
Berumen, M.L. and Pratchett, M.S. (2006) Effects of resource availability on the competitive behaviour of butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae). Proceedings of the Tenth International Coral Reef Symposium, 644–650.Google Scholar
Berumen, M.L., Pratchett, M.S. and McCormick, M.I. (2005) Within-reef differences in diet and body condition of coral-feeding butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae). Marine Ecology Progress Series 287, 217–225.Google Scholar
Birkeland, C. and Neudecker, S. (1981) Foraging behaviour of two Caribbean chaetodontids: Chaetodon capistratus and C. aculeatus. Copeia 1, 169–178.Google Scholar
Bonaldo, R.M., Krajewski, J.P. and Sazima, I. (2005) Meals for two: foraging activity of the butterflyfish Chaetodon striatus (Perciformes) in Southeast Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 65, 1–6.Google Scholar
Bonin, M.C., Boström-Einarsson, L., Munday, P.L. and Jones, G.P. (2015) The prevalence and importance of competition among coral reef fishes. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 46, 169–190.Google Scholar
Bouchon-Navaro, Y. (1981) Quantitative distribution of the Chaetodontidae on a reef in Moorea Island (French Polynesia). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 55, 145–157.Google Scholar
Bouchon-Navaro, Y. (1986) Partitioning of food and space resources by chaetodontid fishes on coral reefs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 103, 21–40.Google Scholar
Boyce, M.S., Vernier, P.R., Nielsen, S.E. and Schmiegelow, F.K.A. (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling 157, 281–300.Google Scholar
Buckley, B.A. and Szmant, A.M. (2004) RNA/DNA ratios as indicators of metabolic activity in four species of Caribbean reef-building corals. Marine Ecology Progress Series 282, 143–149.Google Scholar
Calderone, E.M., Wagner, M., Onge-Burns, J.St. and Buckley, L.J. (2001) Protocol and guide for estimating nucleic acids in larval fish using a fluorescence microplate reader. Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Reference Document 01–11, National Marine Fisheries Service, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 22 pp.Google Scholar
Chícharo, M.A. and Chícharo, L. (2008) RNA:DNA ratio and other nucleic acid derived indices in marine ecology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 9, 1453–1471.Google Scholar
Cole, A.J. and Pratchett, M.S. (2014) Diversity in diet and feeding behaviour of butterflyfishes: reliance on reef corals vs reef habitats. In Pratchett, M.S., Berumen, M.L. and Kapoor, B.G. (eds) Biology of butterflyfishes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 105–139.Google Scholar
Cox, D.R. and Oakes, D. (1984) Analysis of survival data. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Cox, E. (1994) Resource use by corallivorous butterflyfishes (Family Chaetodontidae) in Hawaii. Bulletin of Marine Science 54, 535–545.Google Scholar
Craiu, R.V., Duchesne, T. and Fortin, D. (2008) Inference methods for the conditional logistic regression model with longitudinal data. Biometrical Journal 50, 97–109.Google Scholar
Crow, K., Munehara, H. and Bernardi, G. (2010) Sympatric speciation in a genus of marine reef fishes. Molecular Ecology 19, 2089–2105.Google Scholar
Dahlhoff, E.P. and Menge, B.A. (1996) Influence of phytoplankton concentration and wave exposure on the ecophysiology of Mytilus californianus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 144, 97–107.Google Scholar
Ferreira, C.E.L., Floeter, S.R., Gasparini, J.L., Joyeux, J.C. and Ferreira, B.P. (2004) Trophic structure patterns of Brazilian reef fishes: a latitudinal comparison. Journal of Biogeography 31, 1093–1106.Google Scholar
Fessler, J.L. and Westneat, M.W. (2007) Molecular phylogenetics of the butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae): taxonomy and biogeography of a global coral reef fish family. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45, 50–68.Google Scholar
Fulton, C., Bellwood, D. and Wainwright, P. (2001) The relationship between swimming ability and habitat use in wrasses (Labridae). Marine Biology 139, 25–33.Google Scholar
Harmelin-Vivien, M.L. and Bouchon-Navaro, Y. (1983) Feeding diets and significance of coral feeding among chaetodontid fishes in Moorea (French Polynesia). Coral Reefs 2, 119–127.Google Scholar
Hodge, J.R. and Bellwood, D.R. (2016) The geography of speciation in coral reef fishes: the relative importance of biogeographical barriers in separating sister-species. Journal of Biogeography 43, 1324–1335.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1974) Quantitative measurement of food selection: a modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev's Electivity Index. Oecologia 14, 413–417.Google Scholar
Kawakami, E. and Vazzoler, G. (1980) Método gráfico e estimativa de índice alimentar aplicado no estudo de alimentação de peixes. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico 29, 205–207.Google Scholar
Kohler, K.E. and Gill, S.M. (2006) Coral Point Count with Excel extensions (CPCe): a visual basic program for the determination of coral and substrate coverage using random point count methodology. Computers and Geosciences 32, 1259–1269.Google Scholar
Kono, N., Tsukamoto, Y. and Zenitani, H. (2003) RNA:DNA ratio for diagnosis of the nutritional condition of Japanese anchovy Engraulis japonicus larvae during the first feeding stage. Fisheries Science 69, 1096–1102.Google Scholar
Lasker, H.R. (1985) Prey preferences and browsing pressure of the butterflyfish Chaetodon capistratus on Caribbean gorgonians. Marine Ecology Progress Series 21, 213–220.Google Scholar
Lehner, P.N. (1996) Handbook of ethological methods, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, J.M. and HilleRisLambers, J. (2010) The maintenance of species diversity. Nature Education Knowledge 3, 59.Google Scholar
Liedke, A.M.R., Barneche, D.R., Ferreira, C.E.L., Segal, B., Teixeira, L.N., Burigo, A.P.C., Carvalho, J.A., Buck, S., Bonaldo, R.M. and Floeter, S.R. (2016) Abundance, diet, foraging and nutritional condition of the banded butterflyfish (Chaetodon striatus) along the western Atlantic. Marine Biology 163, 6.Google Scholar
Madduppa, H., Zamani, N.P., Subhan, B., Aktani, U. and Ferse, S.C. (2014) Feeding behavior and diet of the eight-banded butterflyfish Chaetodon octofasciatus in the Thousand Islands, Indonesia. Environmental Biology of Fishes 97, 1–13.Google Scholar
Manly, B.F.J. (1993) A review of computer intensive multivariate methods in ecology. In Patil, G.P. and Rao, C.R. (eds) Multivariate environmental statistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 307–346.Google Scholar
Manly, B.F.J. (1997) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Manly, B.J., McDonald, L.L. and Thomas, D.L. (1993) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Mariscal, R.N. (1974) Nematocysts. In Muscatine, L. and Lenhoff, H.M. (eds) Coelenterate biology: reviews and new perspectives. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 129–178.Google Scholar
Montanari, S.R., van Herwerden, L., Pratchett, M.S., Hobbs, J.-P.A. and Fugedi, A. (2012) Reef fish hybridization: lessons learnt from butterflyfishes (genus Chaetodon). Ecology and Evolution 2, 310–328.Google Scholar
Nagelkerken, I., Van der Velde, G., Wartenbergh, S.L.J., Nugues, M.M. and Pratchett, M.S. (2009) Cryptic dietary components reduce dietary overlap among sympatric butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae). Journal of Fish Biology 75, 1123–1143.Google Scholar
Neudecker, S. (1985) Foraging patterns of chaetodontids and pomachanthid fishes at St. Croix (US Virgin Islands). Proceedings of Fifth Intenational Coral Reefs Congress, Tahiti, Vol. 5.Google Scholar
NOAA (2014) National Coral Reef Monitoring Program Database (NCCOS). Available at http://www8.nos.noaa.gov/bpdmWeb/queryMain.aspx (accessed 1 January 2014).Google Scholar
Pitts, P.A. (1991) Comparative use of food and space by three Bahamian butterflyfishes. Bulletin of Marine Science 48, 749–756.Google Scholar
Pratchett, M.S. (2005) Dietary overlap among coral-feeding butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae) at Lizard Island, northern Great Barrier Reef. Marine Biology 148, 373–382.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Rocha, L.A., Lindeman, K.C., Rocha, C.R. and Lessios, H.A. (2008) Historical biogeography and speciation in the reef fish genus Haemulon (Teleostei: Haemulidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48, 918–928.Google Scholar
Sala, E. and Ballesteros, E. (1997) Partitioning of food and space resources by three fish of the genus Diplodus (Sparidae) in a Mediterranean rocky infralittoral ecosystem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 152, 273–283.Google Scholar
Schoener, T.W. (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185, 27–39.Google Scholar
Therneau, T. (2015) A package for survival analysis in R. version 2.38. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival.Google Scholar
Tricas, T.C. (1989) Determinants of feeding territory size in the corallivorous butterflyfish, Chaetodon multicinctus. Animal Behavior 37, 830–841.Google Scholar
Wilson, S.K., Bellwood, D.R., Choat, J.H. and Furnas, M.J. (2003) Detritus in the epilithic algal matrix and its use by coral reef fishes. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 41, 279–309.Google Scholar
Wright, J.S. (1992) Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia 130, 1–14.Google Scholar
Zekeria, Z.A., Dawit, Y., Ghebremedhin, S., Naser, M. and Videler, J.J. (2002) Resource partitioning among four butterflyfish species in the Red Sea. Marine and Freshwater Research 53, 163–168.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Liedke supplementary material

Liedke supplementary material 1

Download Liedke supplementary material(Image)
Image 807 KB
Supplementary material: File

Liedke supplementary material

Appendices

Download Liedke supplementary material(File)
File 39.9 KB