Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T13:25:45.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detecting Genotype–Environment Interaction in Monozygotic Twin Data: Comparing the Jinks and Fulker Test and a New Test Based on Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Sophie van der Sluis*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. S.van.der.Sluis@psy.vu.nl
Conor V. Dolan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Michael C. Neale
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry, Virginia Institute of Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Dorret I. Boomsma
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Danielle Posthuma
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
*
*Address for correspondence: Sophie van der Sluis, Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article is concerned with the power to detect the presence of genotype by environment interaction (G × E) in the case that both genes and environment feature as latent (i.e., unmeasured) variables. The power of the test proposed by Jinks and Fulker (1970), which is based on regressing the absolute difference between the scores of monozygotic twins on the sums of these scores, is compared to the power of an alternative test, which is based on Marginal Maximum Likelihood (MML). Simulation studies showed that generally the power of the MML-based test was greater than the power of the Jinks and Fulker test in detecting linear and curvilinear G × E interaction, regardless of whether the distribution of the data deviated significantly from normality. However, after a normalizing transformation, the Jinks and Fulker test performed slightly better. Some possible future extensions of the MML-based test are briefly discussed.

Type
Special Section on Advances in Statistical Models and Methods
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006