Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:49:07.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robust, Efficient, Optical-Damage-Resistant, 200 mJ Nanosecond Ultraviolet Light Source for Satellite-Based Lidar Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Darrell J. Armstrong  and
Arlee V. Smith
Darrell J. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Lasers, Optics, and Remote Sensing Department Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185-1423, U.S.A.
Arlee V. Smith
Affiliation:
Lasers, Optics, and Remote Sensing Department Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185-1423, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Conventional wisdom contends that high-energy nanosecond UV laser sources operate near the optical damage thresholds of their constituent materials. This notion is particularly true for nonlinear frequency converters like optical parametric oscillators, where poor beam quality combined with high intra-cavity fluence leads to catastrophic failure of crystals and optical coatings. The collective disappointment of many researchers supports this contention. However, we're challenging this frustrating paradigm by developing high-energy nanosecondUVsources that are efficient, mechanically robust, and most important, resistant to optical damage. Based on sound design principles developed through numerical modeling and rigorous laboratory testing, our sources generate 8-10 ns 190 mJ pulses at 320 nm with fluences≤ 1 J/cm2. Using the second harmonic of a Q-switched, injection-seeded Nd:YAGlaser as the pump source, we convert the near-IR Nd:YAG fundamental to UV with optical-to-optical efficiency exceeding 21%.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 883: Symposium FF – Advanced Devices and Materials for Laser Remote Sensing , 2005 , FF1.5
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fix, A. and Ehret, G. Appl. Phys. B67, 331 (1998).Google Scholar
2 Tiihonen, M. Pasiskevicius, V. Laurell, F. Jonsson, P. and Lindgren, M. in Solid State Lasers XIII: Technology and Devices, edited by Scheps, R. and Hoffman, H. J. (SPIE Proc. 5332, San Jose, CA, 2004) pp. 134–C142.Google Scholar
3 Smith, A. V. and Armstrong, D. J. J. Opt Soc. Am. B 19, 1801 (2002).Google Scholar
4 He, Y. and Orr, B. J. presented at CLEO/QELS 2003, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 2003.Google Scholar
5 Armstrong, D. J. and Smith, A. V. in Laser Beam Shaping V, edited by Dickey, F. M. Shealy, D. L. and Sasiáan, J. M., (SPIE Proc. 5525, Denver, CO, 2004) pp. 88–97.Google Scholar
6 Armstrong, D. J. and Smith, A. V. in Lidar Remote Sensing for Environment Monitroing V, edited by Singh, U. and Mizutani, K. (Proc. SPIE 5653, Honolulu, HI, 2004).Google Scholar
7 Armstrong, D. J. and Smith, A. V. in Nonlinear Frequency Generation and Conversion: Materials, Devices, and Applications IV edited by Powers, P. E. (Proc. SPIE 5710, San Jose, CA, 2005).Google Scholar
8Approximate value for the damage theshold of β-barium borate at λ = 320 nm obtained from the SNLO-QMIX crystal data base, http://www.sandia.gov/imrl/X1118/xxtal.htm.Google Scholar