Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:39:16.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field Emission Energy Distribution and Current-Voltage Characteristics Using Single Tip Gated Diodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

John M Bernhard
Affiliation:
University of North Texas, Physics & Material Science Departments, Denton, TX 76203
Ambrosio A. Rouse
Affiliation:
University of North Texas, Physics & Material Science Departments, Denton, TX 76203
Edward D. Sosa
Affiliation:
University of North Texas, Physics & Material Science Departments, Denton, TX 76203
Bruce E. Gnade
Affiliation:
University of North Texas, Physics & Material Science Departments, Denton, TX 76203
David E. Golden
Affiliation:
University of North Texas, Physics & Material Science Departments, Denton, TX 76203
Babu R. Chalamala
Affiliation:
Motorola, Inc., Flat Panel Display Division, Tempe, AZ 85284
Sanjeev Aggarwal
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Dept. of Material Science and Nuclear Eng., College Park, MD 20742
R. Ramesh
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Dept. of Material Science and Nuclear Eng., College Park, MD 20742
Get access

Abstract

Field emission current-voltage characteristics and simultaneous field emission electron energy distributions have been measured using single tip gate diodes. An energy distribution is generated at each step of a current-voltage characteristic using a compact low-cost simulated hemispherical energy analyzer. A PC programmed with graphics-based data acquisition software is used for data acquisition and control. The PC is connected to a CAMAC crate and a picoammeter through a GPIB interface. The picoammeter measures the current leaving the tip and the field emission electrons are energy analyzed, detected and processed in the CAMAC crate. The CAMAC crate also sends control voltages. to the gate anode and the energy analyzer. This apparatus was used to measure tip work functions and Fowler-Nordheim tip shape parameters for Mo and IrO2 field emission tips. Work function measurements from field emission tips are compared to photoelectric work function measurements from flat surfaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Fowler, R. H. and Nordheim, L., Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A119, 683 (1928).Google Scholar
2. Young, R. D., Phys. Rev., 113, 110 (1958).Google Scholar
3. Young, R. D. and Kuyatt, C. E., Rev. Sci. Inst., 39, 1477 (1968).Google Scholar
4. Berglund, C. N. and Spicer, W. E., Phys. Rev., A136, 1030 (1964).Google Scholar
5. Kane, E. O., Phys. Rev., 127, 131 (1962).Google Scholar
6. Smith, N. V., Phys. Rev., B3, 1762 (1971).Google Scholar
7. Jost, K., J. Phys., E12, 1006 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Kuyatt, C. E. and Simpson, J. A., Rev. Sci. Instrum., 38, 1 (1967).Google Scholar
9. Dahl, D. A. and Delmore, J. E., SIMION, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory.Google Scholar
10. Chalamala, B.R., Wei, Y., Bernhard, J.B., Rouse, A.A., Sosa, E.D., Golden, D.E., Aggarwal, S., Gnade, B.E. and Ramesh, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1394 (1999).Google Scholar
11. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 77th ed., 12122 (1997).Google Scholar
12. Rouse, A., Bernhard, J., Sosa, E., and Golden, D., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., March (1999).Google Scholar