Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:56:06.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lipidomic analysis of fatty acids in erythrocytes of coeliac patients before and after a gluten-free diet intervention: a comparison with healthy subjects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2014

Giuseppe Riezzo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Pathophysiology, National Institute for Digestive Diseases IRCCS ‘Saverio de Bellis’, Via Turi 27, Castellana Grotte I-70013, Bari, Italy
Carla Ferreri
Affiliation:
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), ISOF Bio Free Radicals, Bologna, Italy
Antonella Orlando
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Pathophysiology, National Institute for Digestive Diseases IRCCS ‘Saverio de Bellis’, Via Turi 27, Castellana Grotte I-70013, Bari, Italy
Manuela Martulli
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Pathophysiology, National Institute for Digestive Diseases IRCCS ‘Saverio de Bellis’, Via Turi 27, Castellana Grotte I-70013, Bari, Italy
Benedetta D'Attoma
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Pathophysiology, National Institute for Digestive Diseases IRCCS ‘Saverio de Bellis’, Via Turi 27, Castellana Grotte I-70013, Bari, Italy
Francesco Russo*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Nutritional Pathophysiology, National Institute for Digestive Diseases IRCCS ‘Saverio de Bellis’, Via Turi 27, Castellana Grotte I-70013, Bari, Italy
*
*Corresponding author: Dr F. Russo, fax +39 0804994313, email francesco.russo@irccsdebellis.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Coeliac disease (CD) patients may exhibit a pro-inflammatory profile and fatty acids (FA) can influence inflammation through a variety of cellular pathways in them. The aims of the present study were to (1) evaluate the FA composition of erythrocytes obtained from newly diagnosed CD patients by lipidomic analysis and compare it with that in healthy subjects and (2) determine the effects of 1-year gluten-free diet (GFD) intervention. A total of twenty CD patients (five men and fifteen women; mean age 34·0 (sem 1·7) years) were evaluated at diagnosis and after 1 year of GFD intervention. A total of twenty healthy subjects (seven men and thirteen women; mean age 40·2 (sem 2·5) years) served as controls. CD patients on an unrestricted diet exhibited a significant 2·08-fold higher concentration of arachidic acid when compared with healthy subjects, suggesting that it can be considered as a putative marker of CD. Besides, the arachidonic acid (AA):dihomo-γ-linolenic acid ratio was 2·01-fold significantly lower in CD patients than in healthy subjects (P< 0·01), underlying an inefficient synthesis of PUFA from their precursors in terms of desaturase activity. In addition, mainly due to lower concentrations of docosahexaenoic acid, the inflammation marker AA:docosahexaenoic acid ratio was 1·40-fold significantly higher in CD patients than in healthy subjects. After 1 year of GFD intervention, FA concentrations in CD patients were still different from those observed in healthy subjects. The lipidomic analysis of erythrocyte membranes confirmed the presence of an altered FA composition in CD patients and the GFD's ability to modify FA profile, even if 1-year GFD intervention seems to be not sufficient to restore FA concentrations to normality. This procedure, being easier and non-invasive compared with the evaluation of the FA pattern of the intestinal mucosa, could offer more potentiality for also evaluating therapeutic interventions in CD patients by using FA supplementation.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disorder characterised by villous atrophy of the upper small intestine caused by intolerance to gluten in wheat and similar proteins in barley and rye( Reference Gujral, Freeman and Thomson 1 ). CD can present with a wide spectrum of symptoms including both gastrointestinal (GI; e.g. diarrhoea, bloating and abdominal pain) and extra-GI symptoms. CD therapy involves a gluten-free diet (GFD), which allows CD patients to achieve functional and structural restoration of the intestinal mucosa( Reference Haines, Anderson and Gibson 2 ).

Different autoimmune diseases sharing a persistent low-grade inflammation (such as diabetes, Hashimoto's thyroiditis and psoriasis) exhibit an earlier atherosclerosis progression( Reference Zhao 3 ). Consistent with the immune and inflammatory conditions of CD, an inflammatory profile and an increased risk for the development of inflammation-related conditions might also be expected in CD patients( Reference Solakivi, Kaukinen and Kunnas 4 Reference Pitocco, Giubilato and Martini 6 ). In this context, there is growing evidence suggesting that excessive fatty acids (FA), namely SFA, MUFA and PUFA and endogenous trans-FA, could play an active role( Reference Hunter, Zhang and Kris-Etherton 7 ). Notably, such an increase in FA may be related to diet and radical stress conditions( Reference Chatgilialoglu, Ferreri and Lykakis 8 ).

Various dietary components including long-chain n-3 FA, plant flavonoids and carotenoids have been demonstrated to modulate oxidative stress, gene expression and inflammatory mediator production( Reference Ferretti, Bacchetti and Masciangelo 9 ). Besides, FA composition of intestinal membranes is important for epithelial function, and its disorders may contribute to the pathophysiology of CD.

The composition of dietary FA is reflected in circulating FA profile. Therefore, determination of FA in different biological samples could be used to diagnose deficiency of some FA, especially the essential FA (linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid), in subjects adhering to restricted diets because of food allergies or other diseases. However, the constituents of complex lipids are extremely different, and the combinations and permutations at which they are assembled in individual molecular lipid species further strengthen this difference. Currently, an extensive list of lipid classes and their distinctive molecular species that are present in a biological sample can be obtained by lipidomic analysis and FA-based functional lipidomics is gaining an important place among the molecular diagnostic tools available to physicians( Reference Wolf and Quinn 10 , Reference Ferreri and Chatgilialoglu 11 ). Methodologically, the complexity of the task is exemplified by the human erythrocyte, which contains only a plasma membrane( Reference Kim, Kim and Hahm 12 ). This membrane is known to contain up to 300 molecular species of glycerophospholipids formed by different long-chain (C14–C22) FA, each present at a level exceeding 2 % of the total FA.

The content of FA in erythrocytes represents the result of interactions among dietary FA and endocrine and immunological modifications( Reference Pala, Krogh and Muti 13 ), partly due to the long half-life (120 d) of erythrocytes. Under dietary restrictions that can reduce the inflammatory status and immune response( Reference Kim, Kim and Hahm 12 ), an active role may be plausible for the individual FA pool. In this perspective, its evaluation could be useful for evaluating the relations with dietary restrictions due to a GFD and investigating the non-immunological mechanism of the gluten intolerance.

Contrasting data on FA profile in CD patients are available in the literature, and these have mainly been obtained from serum or tissue evaluations( Reference Solakivi, Kaukinen and Kunnas 4 , Reference Steel, Ryd and Ascher 14 ), but not from lipidomic analysis of erythrocyte membranes. Thus, by applying this methodology, the aims of the present study were (1) to evaluate the FA composition of erythrocyte membranes in newly diagnosed CD patients and compare it with that in healthy subjects and (2) to investigate whether 1-year GFD intervention can induce changes in FA composition in CD patients.

Methods

Participants

Cases for the present case–control study were recruited from among the outpatients of the National Institute of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS ‘Saverio de Bellis’, Castellana G. (Italy).

They were screened and recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: age >18 years; active symptoms for at least 2 weeks; a minimum average of 3·0 on the seven-point Likert scale of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale-irritable bowel syndrome composite symptom score; the assumption of a free diet.

Exclusion criteria included metabolic and endocrine disorders; hepatic diseases, renal diseases, or CVD; constipation; fever and intense physical activity; previous abdominal surgery; history of malignancy; secondary causes of intestinal atrophy; pregnancy and lactose intolerance; and giardiasis. In addition, cases were excluded if they reported the use of medication for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome for 2 weeks before evaluation, antibiotics or probiotic agents, and other drugs known to cause abdominal pain. All the women were examined during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.

Cases were first diagnosed to have CD on the basis of both positive antitransglutaminase antibodies and antiendomysium antibodies. In the case of a positive serological test, biopsies from the proximal part and from the distal part of the duodenum were taken to confirm the diagnosis. Cases were considered to have CD if confirmed by histological evidence, according to the modified Marsh–Oberhuber criteria (grades 3b–3c)( Reference Antonioli 15 ).

After diagnosis, CD patients were instructed to follow a specific GFD as reported in Table 1 and given additional counselling during the follow-up visit. CD patients were evaluated at diagnosis and at least 12 months after the start of GFD intervention. Dietary compliance assessment during the 1-year visit was based on the assessment of coeliac serology, self-reported compliance, and the opinion of the patient's physician. The physicians categorised each patient's compliance with the GFD as strict compliance; partial compliance with occasional lapses (i.e. two to three lapses per month or no more than one lapse per week); and non-compliance or no gluten restriction at all. When discrepancy was observed among the assessments, the physician reassessed the patient to determine the final categorisation.

Table 1 Dietary suggestions for standardised consumption of gluten-free products

* Pasta could be substituted by naturally gluten-free food.

As controls, healthy subjects were enrolled from among the administrative staff of our institute. They reported that they did not have metabolic, endocrine or immunological diseases, dyspepsia, or other GI diseases and did not take any medication. Information on the health status of these subjects was obtained during an examination consisting of an interview on the current diet, lifestyle, and medical history and a physical examination. Negative antiendomysium antibodies and antitransglutaminase antibodies were criteria for inclusion in the study. Besides, metabolic parameters (blood glucose, glycated Hb, lipid profile, body weight and blood pressure) had to be in the normal range.

The present study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the local Scientific and Ethics Committees. Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients and healthy subjects. The clinical trial on CD was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (register no. NCT01574209).

Analytical measurements

All the analytical measurements were performed at the time of enrolment. In CD patients, the measurements were repeated during the follow-up visit, after being on the GFD intervention for at least 12 months.

A blood sample was collected after an overnight fast, immediately centrifuged and stored at − 80°C until analysis. Routine biochemical analyses were conducted to evaluate the values of fasting serum total cholesterol (mmol/l), HDL (mmol/l), LDL:HDL ratio, TAG (mmol/l), ferritin (mg/l), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h), C-reactive protein (mg/l), leucocyte count (109/l) and platelet count (109/l). LDL values were calculated according to the Friedewald formula( Reference Tremblay, Morrissette and Gagne 16 ).

Antiendomysium antibodies were detected using an indirect immunofluorescence technique and antitransglutaminase antibodies using ELISA (Eurospital).

The plasma concentrations of IL-6 and IL-8 were measured in duplicate using commercially available sandwich ELISA kits (Human IL-6 ELISA and Human IL-8 ELISA; BD Biosciences).

Erythrocyte isolation

In both CD patients and controls, a blood sample was collected from the cubital vein into an evacuated blood collection tube containing EDTA. Erythrocytes were separated using Ficoll-Hypaque (Pharmacia) density gradient centrifugation. The pellet was washed three times with four volumes of 0·9 % NaCl and then erythrocytes in the pellet aliquot were counted using a Sysmex-Toak 1000 cell counter (Gelman Instrument). Each sample was stored at − 80°C until analysis.

Lipidomic analysis

Lipidomic analysis was performed by Lipinutragen srl (Bologna, Italy). The total lipid fractions, obtained by fractionation of erythrocytes from the study groups, were extracted with 2:1 chloroform–methanol (v/v)( Reference Bligh and Dyer 17 ), and the extracts were examined by TLC for the presence of lipid classes, as described previously, which were identified by reference compounds to be phospholipids mixed with TAG( Reference Aoun, Feillet-Coudray and Fouret 18 ). The extracts were treated by transesterification with KOH/MeOH (0·5 m) for 20 min at room temperature( Reference Kramer, Fellner and Dugan 19 ). FA methyl esters were subsequently extracted with n-hexane and 1 μl of these solutions was used for analysis.

FA methyl esters were analysed by GC (Agilent 6850) equipped with a 60 m × 0·25 mm × 0·25 μm (50 %-cyanopropyl)-methylpolysiloxane column (DB23, Agilent) and a flame ionisation detector. Injector temperature was 230°C.

The oven conditions were as follows: temperature started from 195°C, held for 26 min, followed by an increase of 10°C/min up to 205°C, held for 13 min, followed by a second increase of 30°C/min up to 240°C, and held for 10 min. A constant pressure mode (29 pounds per square inch) was chosen with hydrogen as the carrier gas.

Methyl esters were identified by comparison with the retention times of authentic samples. GC/MS spectra were recorded on a Clarus 500 GC apparatus equipped with a Clarus 560S mass spectrometer (GC/MS transfer line temperature 230°C (Perkin Elmer)) and a 60 m × 0·25 mm × 0·25 μm (50 %-cyanopropylphenyl)-dimethylpolysiloxane column (DB225ms, Agilent), using an injector temperature of 230°C, a split ratio of 50:1 and helium as the carrier gas at a constant flow of 1·2 ml/min, with the following oven conditions: temperature started from 195°C, held for 52 min, followed by an increase of 3°C/min up to 205°C, held for 10 min, followed by a second increase of 3°C/min up to 225°C, held for 15 min, and a final increase of 5°C/min up to 230°C and held for 10 min.

Sample size calculation

The present study aimed to detect a change in the FA profile considering that at least 75 % of the patients would report the absence of diarrhoea after 1 year of GFD intervention as detected by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale cluster ‘diarrhoea syndrome’ (three items: increased frequency of evacuation, loose stools and urgent need to defaecate; maximum score: 21).

Considering a magnitude of the difference between the means in cluster ‘diarrhoea syndrome’ of 3·7 and a standard deviation of 4·0 at a significance level of 0·05 (two tailed), nineteen patients per group were required to have 80 % power to detect a significant difference between the study groups.

Statistical analysis

All results are expressed as means with their standard errors unless otherwise specified. The Kruskal–Wallis test (with Dunn's post hoc test) was used to assess differences among the study groups.

All the differences were considered significant at the 5 % level. A specific statistical package for exact non-parametric inference (Stata Statistical Software: Release 9; StataCorp, 2005) was used.

Results

Participant characteristics

The flow of participants through the study is shown in Fig. 1. A total 220 individuals with GI symptoms resembling irritable bowel syndrome were recruited between January 2010 and November 2012. Of these patients, thirty-five did not fulfil the inclusion criteria; twenty-three were excluded due to refusal to undergo endoscopy or refusal to adhere to dietary requirements; and five did not participate in the study due to other reasons. A total of 157 patients met the inclusion criteria, and forty-one adult newly diagnosed CD patients with diarrhoea as the prevalent GI symptom were identified. Among these patients, three declined to participate and one had an organic disease. After 1 year of GFD intervention, twenty CD patients were found to have strictly complied to the dietary requirements (five men and fifteen women; mean age 34·0 (sem 1·7) years; mean BMI 22·5 (sem 0·5) kg/m2) and were included in the analysis. These patients were evaluated at diagnosis and at least 12 months after the start of GFD intervention (13·6 (sem 1·2) months). The healthy control group comprised twenty-eight subjects; among these, eight did not complete the study. Thus, twenty healthy subjects (seven men and thirteen women; mean age 40·2 (sem 2·5) years; mean BMI 24·8 (sem 0·8) kg/m2) completed the study. The anthropometric and medical data are reported in Table 2.

Fig. 1 The flow of participants through the study. CD, coeliac disease; GFD, gluten-free diet.

Table 2 Anthropometric and medical data of healthy controls and coeliac disease (CD) patients at diagnosis and after 1 year of gluten-free diet (GFD) intervention* (Mean values with their standard errors; n 20)

* Evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison test and the χ2 test for categorical variables.

Apart from diarrhoea, the main presenting GI symptoms in CD patients were abdominal pain (11·0 %) and dyspepsia (4·6 %). Villous atrophy was partial in 45 % and total in 55 %. The most common non-GI symptoms in the majority of CD cases were anaemia (20·7 %) and osteopaenia (6·0 %). Follow-up blood samples were obtained during the 1-year follow-up visit.

Serum lipid concentrations at baseline and after the GFD intervention are reported in Table 3. Either before or after 1 year of GFD intervention, CD patients exhibited significantly lower total cholesterol (P= 0·004), LDL (P= 0·004) and TAG (P= 0·005) concentrations and LDL:HDL ratio (P= 0·006) in comparison with healthy subjects. There were no significant differences in HDL concentrations among the study groups. Besides, after 1 year of GFD intervention, all the lipidic variables in CD patients remained substantially unchanged (data analysed by Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparison test). There was a 4·4 kg increase in the mean weight (95 % CI 2·7, 5·35) from the baseline mean weight of 66·9 (sd 4·0) kg.

Table 3 Serum lipid concentrations in healthy controls and coeliac disease (CD) patients at diagnosis and after 1 year of gluten-free diet (GFD) intervention* (Mean values with their standard errors; n 20)

a,bMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; Dunn's test).

* Evaluated by the Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison test.

Inflammatory markers in coeliac disease patients before and after 1 year of gluten-free diet intervention and healthy controls

The mean values of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein concentrations were significantly higher in CD patients, either before or after 1 year of GFD intervention, than those in healthy subjects, but there were no significant differences in leucocyte and platelet counts and ferritin concentrations (Table 4).

Table 4 Markers of systemic inflammation in healthy controls and coeliac disease (CD) patients at diagnosis and after 1 year of gluten-free diet (GFD) intervention* (Mean values with their standard errors, n 20)

ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

a,bMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; Dunn's test).

* Evaluated by the Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's multiple comparison test.

The plasma concentrations of IL-6 and IL-8 in healthy subjects and CD patients, either before or after 1 year of GFD intervention, are shown in Fig. 2 (a) and (b), respectively. The mean plasma IL-6 concentration was 3·78 (sem 0·52) pg/ml in healthy subjects, 5·48 (sem 1·24) pg/ml in CD patients on an unrestricted diet and 2·89 (sem 0·63) pg/ml in CD patients on a GFD for 1 year. There were significant differences in IL-6 concentrations among the study groups (P= 0·001). In response to the GFD intervention, IL-6 concentrations in CD patients decreased by 48·7 % when compared with the initial values, and Dunn's test showed that there were significant differences in the IL-6 concentrations of CD patients before and after 1 year of GFD intervention (P< 0·05).

Fig. 2 Distribution of IL-6 (a) and IL-8 (b) in healthy subjects (n 20) and coeliac disease (CD) patients on an unrestricted diet (n 20) and after 1 year of gluten-free diet (GFD) intervention (n 20). Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars (Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's post hoc test). a,bMean values with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; Dunn's test).

The mean plasma IL-8 concentration was 9·49 (sem 1·59) pg/ml in healthy subjects, 28·51 (sem 7·73) pg/ml in CD patients on an unrestricted diet and 10·87 (sem 1·56) pg/ml in CD patients on a GFD for 1 year. In addition, there were significant differences in IL-8 concentrations among the study groups (P< 0·0001). After 1 year of dietetic treatment, IL-8 concentrations decreased in CD patients by almost 62 % compared with the initial values, reaching that found in healthy subjects. Dunn's test showed that IL-8 concentrations in CD patients on an unrestricted diet were significantly different from those in both healthy subjects and CD patients on a GFD (P< 0·05; data analysed by Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparison test).

Fatty acid profile

The lipidomic profile of the erythrocyte membranes of CD patients is summarised in Table 5. When compared with that of healthy subjects, the lipidomic profile of CD patients exhibited significantly lower concentrations of palmitic acid (16 : 0; P= 0·02), stearic acid (18 : 0; P= 0·008), oleic acid (18 : 1; P= 0·04), linoleic acid (18 : 2; P= 0·01) and DHA (22 : 6n-3; P= 0·04) and higher concentrations of arachidic acid (20 : 0; P< 0·0001), eicosadienoic acid (20 : 2; P= 0·03), dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (DGLA; 20 : 3n-6; P= 0·01), eicosatrienoic acid (20 : 3n-3; P= 0·04), docosapentaenoic acid (22 : 5n-3; P= 0·0005) and (20 : 4t) FA (P= 0·009).

Table 5 Lipidomic profile of erythrocyte membranes of healthy controls and coeliac disease (CD) patients at diagnosis and after 1 year of gluten-free diet (GFD) intervention* (Mean values with their standard errors, n 20)

DGLA, dihomo-γ-linolenic; AA, arachidonic acid; ETE, eicosatrienoic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid.

a,bMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; Dunn's test).

* Data are expressed as a percentage of peak areas in the gas chromatograms. The peaks were identified using authentic references, and the identified peaks were >97 % of the total GC peaks. Evaluated by the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparison test.

Fold increase or decrease (+/ − ) between controls and CD patients before the GFD intervention.

As regards SFA, the concentrations of arachidic acid (20 : 0) were 2·08-fold higher in CD patients, suggesting that this SFA can be considered as a peculiar marker of active disease. SFA are substrates of the Δ9-desaturase enzymes: stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 and -2. These rate-limiting enzymes transform the SFA palmitic and stearic acids into palmitoleic and oleic acids, respectively( Reference Brenner, Vergroesen and Crawford 20 ). Their activity can be represented by the Δ9-desaturase index (oleic acid:stearic acid ratio); its reciprocal, defined saturation index, can be considered an indicator of membrane fluidity. In CD patients on an unrestricted diet, SFA were mainly converted into MUFA, as palmitic acid (16 : 0) was transformed into palmitoleic acid (16 : 1), the concentrations of which were 1·22-fold higher than those in healthy subjects. However, the oleic acid:stearic acid ratio, related to endogenous synthesis of MUFA, did not change significantly in CD patients when compared with that in healthy subjects.

As regards the PUFA n-6 family, the concentrations of linoleic acid were 1·21-fold lower, whereas those of its derivative DGLA were 1·47-fold higher in CD patients than in healthy subjects, indicating increased desaturation and elongation of the n-6 FA family. The increase in DGLA concentrations was associated with a 1·20-fold lower concentration of arachidonic acid (AA).

To determine the efficiency of PUFA synthesis from their precursors in terms of desaturase activity, the AA:DGLA ratio was calculated. This ratio was 2·01-fold significantly lower in CD patients on an unrestricted diet (P< 0·01), suggesting either an inhibition of Δ5-desaturase activity or an augmentation of Δ6-desaturase activity. The putative inhibition of Δ5-desaturase activity or augmentation of Δ6-desaturase activity was also observed after 1 year of GFD intervention.

As regards the n-3 series, the concentrations of DHA were 1·81-fold lower in CD patients than in healthy subjects (P= 0·04), while those of eicosatrienoic acid and docosapentaenoic acid were significantly higher in CD patients than in healthy subjects (3·42-fold and 2·42-fold, respectively).

The n-6:n-3 ratio, expressed as AA:DHA ratio, is considered to be a marker of inflammation. In the present study, a significant 1·40-fold increase in this ratio was observed in newly diagnosed CD patients, and it appeared to be mainly due to significantly lower concentrations of DHA in CD patients than in healthy subjects, while the concentrations of AA were quite similar. This could underline that CD patients have an intrinsic FA abnormality.

A compensatory significantly higher total content of the trans-family FA was also observed in CD patients when compared with healthy subjects, in particular, the increase observed in (20 : 4t) FA content, which was 1·50-fold higher in CD patients on an unrestricted diet than in healthy subjects (P= 0·009).

CD patients were evaluated for lipidomic profile 1 year after GFD intervention. FA concentrations differed significantly from those of controls. Significantly lower concentrations of palmitic acid, cis-vaccenic acid and linoleic acid and higher concentrations of docosapentaenoic acid were observed. After 1 year of GFD intervention, the AA:DGLA ratio was still lower than that in healthy subjects, thus suggesting a persistent inhibition of desaturase activity up to 1 year of GFD intervention. On comparison of CD patients before and after the GFD intervention, the AA:DHA ratio was found to be unaltered after dietetic treatment, putting in evidence a persistent inflammation state. Overall, no differences were found in FA profile apart from the concentrations of arachidic acid (20 : 0), which were significantly lower in CD patients on a GFD for 1 year than in those on an unrestricted diet (P= 0·02). No correlation between any of the FA and the inflammatory parameters was found in the study groups (data not shown).

Discussion

The main aims of the present study were to perform a lipidomic evaluation of FA content in the erythrocyte membranes of CD patients and to investigate its relationship with inflammation as well as the effects of a dietetic treatment without gluten. The results indicated that a pro-inflammatory FA profile was present in CD patients and that 1-year GFD intervention was not sufficient to restore FA concentrations to normality. Fig. 3 depicts standard de novo and elongation/desaturation reactions involved in FA biosynthesis and indicates where CD patients differ from healthy subjects.

Fig. 3 The standard de novo and elongation/desaturation reactions involved in fatty acid biosynthesis. The figure puts in evidence where coeliac disease (CD) patients differ from healthy subjects. The reduction of arachidonic acid (AA) concentrations in CD patients, restored by 1-year gluten-free diet intervention, suggests a different utilisation of dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (DGLA) as a substrate for other enzymes and a decrease in the conversion of DGLA into AA. FAS, fatty acid synthase; HETrE, hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid; LT, leukotrienes; PAF, platelet-activating factors; TXA, thromboxane. (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)

In agreement with these observations, increased circulating concentrations of IL-6 and IL-8, classical mediators of inflammation, were found in CD patients when compared with healthy subjects. This evidence sustained once more the systemic inflammatory component of the disease( Reference Fornari, Pedreira and Niveloni 21 ). These inflammation-related biomarkers also seem to be actively involved in slow inflammatory processes and to promptly respond to GFD interventions, further supporting the notion that the dietary treatment induces anti-inflammatory changes( Reference Russo, Chimienti and Clemente 22 ).

FA can influence inflammation through a variety of mechanisms, including actions via cell-surface and intracellular receptors/sensors that control inflammatory cell signalling and gene expression patterns( Reference Calder 23 ). Patients with active CD exhibited a significant increase in the concentrations of arachidic acid, a SFA, when compared with controls. In addition, this SFA exhibited a significant decrease in concentrations after 1 year of GFD intervention, acting differently from the other SFA, which were present at lower concentrations in CD patients than in healthy subjects and substantially unaffected by diet. This feature could make arachidic acid a potential biomarker of CD. Another remarkable finding from the present study was the partial transformation of SFA into MUFA. SFA can elicit desaturase activity. In particular, the transformation of palmitic acid into palmitoleic acid was prominent in CD patients with a reduction of palmitic acid concentrations and an elevation of palmitoleic acid concentrations in comparison with healthy subjects. This elevation was not evident when the total MUFA were considered, the concentrations of which were lower than those in healthy subjects. The oleic acid:stearic acid ratio, representative of the MUFA endogenous synthesis, also did not exhibit significant differences among the study groups. Discrepancies between the behaviours of single FA and their class were also a distinctive trait for other groups of FA, such as n-6 and n-3 FA. This evidence may reflect a different role and involvement of each single FA in the evolution of CD.

As regards n-6 PUFA, overall this class of FA existed at lower concentrations in CD patients than in healthy subjects. The essential FA linoleic acid was found at lower concentrations in patients with active disease than in healthy subjects. Data reported in the literature have already demonstrated that the concentrations of this FA were significantly lower in the serum of patients with ‘chronic intestinal failure’ as well as CD( Reference Solakivi, Kaukinen and Kunnas 4 , Reference Steel, Ryd and Ascher 14 , Reference Chambrier, Garcia and Bannier 24 ). Steel et al. ( Reference Steel, Ryd and Ascher 14 ) reported low concentrations of linoleic acid in the intestinal mucosa of CD patients, both before and after the GFD intervention. Our data are consistent with this report as the linoleic acid content in the erythrocyte membranes of CD patients after 1 year of GFD intervention was still lower when compared with that of healthy subjects.

CD patients exhibited significantly higher DGLA concentrations, along with moderate and not significantly lower AA concentrations, in comparison with healthy subjects. DGLA derives from linoleic acid and is converted into AA. Both of them are substrates for the peroxidase enzymes (cyclooxygenase) that transform these FA into PGE1 and PGE2, respectively( Reference Wang, Lin and Gu 25 ). Another metabolic DGLA pathway involves the peroxidation enzymes (lipoxygenase) naturally existing in neutrophils, macrophages, monocytes and epithelial cells, which can inhibit the synthesis of pro-inflammatory metabolites from AA. The inhibition of these metabolites (leukotrienes) is considered to be the main mechanism for the anti-inflammatory action of DGLA. A possible block in DGLA metabolism, including the pathway leading to the conversion into AA, could activate the synthesis of these pro-inflammatory metabolites (such as PGE2, leukotrienes and platelet-activating factors) from AA( Reference Russo, Chimienti and Clemente 22 ).

An alternative pathway could also be hypothesised, considering that DGLA has a series of important functions as a precursor for eicosanoids (e.g. PGE1) or other mediators showing a regulatory activity in immune-related cell reactions. In particular, the reduction of AA concentrations in CD patients, restored by 1-year GFD intervention, suggests a different utilisation of DGLA as a substrate for other enzymes and a decrease in the conversion of DGLA into AA (via Δ5-desaturase). The significant elevation of trans-FA content in CD patients in comparison with healthy subjects could also explain the present findings. The elevation of the content of trans-FA is harmful as these FA heavily interfere with the desaturation of both n-6 and n-3 FA, reducing, in this way, the conversion of DGLA into AA and the availability of EPA and DHA( Reference Simopoulos 26 , Reference Simopoulos 27 ).

Solakivi et al. ( Reference Solakivi, Kaukinen and Kunnas 4 ) evaluated serum FA profile in CD patients before and after 1 year of GFD intervention and found a decrease in the concentrations of AA and the n-3 PUFA EPA and DHA and a slight increase after GFD intervention in patients relative to controls. In the present study, significantly higher total concentrations of n-3 PUFA were found in CD patients than in healthy subjects. However, this was not true for DHA, which was present at lower concentrations in CD patients than in healthy subjects.

DHA is a precursor of resolvins; these substances are anti-inflammatory mediators that could be pivotal in the evolution of CD. Besides, the low concentrations of DHA in CD patients, not completely restored by 1-year GFD intervention, could be due to a reduced conversion of docosapentaenoic acid into DHA. Probably, this is a consequence of the alterations in elongase and Δ6-desaturase activities( Reference Kaur, Cameron-Smith and Garg 28 ). Therapeutically, this evidence may show interesting implications in the management of CD. Supplementation with DHA is gaining increasing importance for the treatment of different pathological conditions, as it seems to be effective at countering the pro-inflammatory effects of AA metabolites (e.g. cyclooxygenase 2 expression or the release of PGE2 and IL-8)( Reference Vincentini, Quaranta and Viora 29 ).

It is well known that a high n-6:n-3 ratio predisposes to inflammation( Reference Riediger, Othman and Fitz 30 Reference Tulk and Robinson 32 ). In this connection, when the AA:DHA ratio was calculated, its value was found to be significantly higher in CD patients, either before or after the GFD intervention, than in healthy subjects. This evidence lets us hypothesise, in agreement with data reported in the literature( Reference Steel, Ryd and Ascher 14 ), that intrinsic abnormalities in FA profile could contribute to inflammation in CD patients.

Furthermore, trans-FA concentrations were higher in CD patients than in healthy subjects. In particular, the concentrations of trans-FA (20 : 4) isomers were markedly elevated in CD patients. It is known that these isomers can be formed only during the free radical stress conditions, which are likely to occur during inflammatory disorders( Reference Ferreri and Chatgilialoglu 11 , Reference Ferreri, Angelini and Chatgilialoglu 33 , Reference Chatgilialoglu, Ferreri and Melchiorre 34 ). Although preliminary, these data on trans-FA isomers, indicative of the formation of sulphur-centred radical species, suggest that these parameters may serve to follow up radical stress involving lipids in CD patients( Reference Chatgilialoglu, Ferreri and Torreggiani 35 ). This information can be useful for further studies, especially coupling proteomic and lipidomic studies, which could give more information of tandem damages influencing the disease outcome.

Finally, the effects of GFD on FA profile were evaluated after 1 year of dietetic treatment. Notably, the different classes of FA reacted differently to the GFD intervention, showing that the treatment was not able to restore FA concentrations to those observed in healthy subjects. Taken as a whole, the present results let us hypothesise that 1-year GFD intervention may be not sufficient to achieve a significant restoration in intestinal functions and absorption, and hence dietetic treatment for a prolonged period might be needed to achieve a significant improvement of FA profiles.

Conclusions

The lipidomic analysis of erythrocyte membranes confirmed the presence of an altered FA composition in CD patients. Moreover, an appropriate dietary treatment with exclusion of gluten can modify FA profile, even if 1-year GFD intervention seems to be not sufficient to restore FA concentrations to normality, suggesting an inadequate supply of long-chain PUFA( Reference Solakivi, Kaukinen and Kunnas 4 ). Lastly, this procedure, being easier and non-invasive compared with the evaluation of the FA pattern of the intestinal mucosa, could offer more potentiality for also evaluating therapeutic interventions in CD patients by using FA supplementation.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Antonella Giannini (IRCCS ‘Saverio de Bellis’) for her valuable technical assistance and Dr Valentina Sunda and Mr Simone Deplano (Lipinutragen, Bologna) for their valuable assistance in FA analysis.

The present study was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (grant no. 254-16.05.2012).

The authors’ contributions are as follows: G. R., C. F. and F. R. were responsible for data analysis and interpretation, wrote the manuscript and contributed to the intellectual content of the article; A. O., M. M. and B. D. collected and interpreted the data and made intellectual contributions to the article. All authors participated in the study to a significant extent and read and approved the submitted manuscript.

C. F. discloses her position as a partner of Lipinutragen srl. The other authors declare no competing interests.

References

1 Gujral, N, Freeman, HJ & Thomson, ABR (2012) Celiac disease: prevalence, diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. World J Gastroenterol 18, 60366059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Haines, ML, Anderson, RP & Gibson, PR (2008) Systematic review: the evidence base for long-term management of coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28, 10421066.Google Scholar
3 Zhao, Q (2009) Inflammation, autoimmunity, and atherosclerosis. Discov Med 8, 712.Google ScholarPubMed
4 Solakivi, T, Kaukinen, K, Kunnas, T, et al. (2009) Serum fatty acid profile in celiac disease patients before and after a gluten-free diet. Scand J Gastroenterol 44, 826830.Google Scholar
5 West, J, Logan, RFA, Card, TR, et al. (2004) Risk of vascular disease in adults with diagnosed coeliac disease: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20, 7379.Google Scholar
6 Pitocco, D, Giubilato, S, Martini, F, et al. (2011) Combined atherogenic effects of celiac disease and type 1 diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis 217, 531535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Hunter, JE, Zhang, J & Kris-Etherton, PM (2010) Cardiovascular disease risk of dietary stearic acid compared with trans, other saturated, and unsaturated fatty acids: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 4663.Google Scholar
8 Chatgilialoglu, C, Ferreri, C, Lykakis, IN, et al. (2006) Trans-fatty acids and radical stress: what are the real culprits? Bioorg Med Chem 14, 61446148.Google Scholar
9 Ferretti, G, Bacchetti, T, Masciangelo, S, et al. (2012) Celiac disease, inflammation and oxidative damage: a nutrigenetic approach. Nutrients 4, 243257.Google Scholar
10 Wolf, C & Quinn, PJ (2008) Lipidomics: practical aspects and applications. Prog Lipid Res 47, 1536.Google Scholar
11 Ferreri, C & Chatgilialoglu, C (2012) Role of fatty acid-based functional lipidomics in the development of molecular diagnostic tools. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 12, 767780.Google Scholar
12 Kim, YJ, Kim, E-H & Hahm, KB (2012) Oxidative stress in inflammation-based gastrointestinal tract diseases: challenges and opportunities. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27, 10041010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Pala, V, Krogh, V, Muti, P, et al. (2001) Erythrocyte membrane fatty acids and subsequent breast cancer: a prospective Italian study. J Natl Cancer Inst 93, 10881095.Google Scholar
14 Steel, DM, Ryd, W, Ascher, H, et al. (2006) Abnormal fatty acid pattern in intestinal mucosa of children with celiac disease is not reflected in serum phospholipids. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 43, 318323.Google Scholar
15 Antonioli, DA (2003) Celiac disease: a progress report. Mod Pathol 16, 342346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Tremblay, AJ, Morrissette, H, Gagne, J-M, et al. (2004) Validation of the Friedewald formula for the determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with beta-quantification in a large population. Clin Biochem 37, 785790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17 Bligh, EG & Dyer, WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37, 911917.Google Scholar
18 Aoun, M, Feillet-Coudray, C, Fouret, G, et al. (2012) Rat liver mitochondrial membrane characteristics and mitochondrial functions are more profoundly altered by dietary lipid quantity than by dietary lipid quality: effect of different nutritional lipid patterns. Br J Nutr 107, 647659.Google Scholar
19 Kramer, JK, Fellner, V, Dugan, ME, et al. (1997) Evaluating acid and base catalysts in the methylation of milk and rumen fatty acids with special emphasis on conjugated dienes and total trans fatty acids. Lipids 32, 12191228.Google Scholar
20 Brenner, RR (1989) Factors influencing fatty acid chain elongation and desaturation. In The Role of Fats in Human Nutrition, 2nd ed., pp. 4679 [Vergroesen, AJ and Crawford, M, editors]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
21 Fornari, MC, Pedreira, S, Niveloni, S, et al. (1998) Pre- and post-treatment serum levels of cytokines IL-1beta, IL-6, and IL-1 receptor antagonist in celiac disease. Are they related to the associated osteopenia? Am J Gastroenterol 93, 413418.Google Scholar
22 Russo, F, Chimienti, G, Clemente, C, et al. (2013) Adipokine profile in celiac patients: differences in comparison with patients suffering from diarrhea-predominant IBS and healthy subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 48, 13771385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Calder, PC (2011) Fatty acids and inflammation: the cutting edge between food and pharma. Eur J Pharmacol 668, Suppl. 1, S50S58.Google Scholar
24 Chambrier, C, Garcia, I, Bannier, E, et al. (2002) Specific changes in n-6 fatty acid metabolism in patients with chronic intestinal failure. Clin Nutr 21, 6772.Google Scholar
25 Wang, X, Lin, H & Gu, Y (2012) Multiple roles of dihomo-γ-linolenic acid against proliferation diseases. Lipids Health Dis 11, 25.Google Scholar
26 Simopoulos, AP (1997) Omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio and trans fatty acids in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann N Y Acad Sci 827, 327338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 Simopoulos, AP (2009) Omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids: biological effects. World Rev Nutr Diet 99, 116.Google Scholar
28 Kaur, G, Cameron-Smith, D, Garg, M, et al. (2011) Docosapentaenoic acid (22 : 5n-3): a review of its biological effects. Prog Lipid Res 50, 2834.Google Scholar
29 Vincentini, O, Quaranta, MG, Viora, M, et al. (2011) Docosahexaenoic acid modulates in vitro the inflammation of celiac disease in intestinal epithelial cells via the inhibition of cPLA2. Clin Nutr 30, 541546.Google Scholar
30 Riediger, ND, Othman, R, Fitz, E, et al. (2008) Low n-6:n-3 fatty acid ratio, with fish- or flaxseed oil, in a high fat diet improves plasma lipids and beneficially alters tissue fatty acid composition in mice. Eur J Nutr 47, 153160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Pischon, T, Hankinson, SE, Hotamisligil, GS, et al. (2003) Habitual dietary intake of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids in relation to inflammatory markers among US men and women. Circulation 108, 155160.Google Scholar
32 Tulk, HM & Robinson, LE (2009) Modifying the n-6/n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid ratio of a high-saturated fat challenge does not acutely attenuate postprandial changes in inflammatory markers in men with metabolic syndrome. Metabolism 58, 17091716.Google Scholar
33 Ferreri, C, Angelini, F, Chatgilialoglu, C, et al. (2005) Trans fatty acids and atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome: the relationship with a free radical cis-trans isomerization of membrane lipids. Lipids 40, 661667.Google Scholar
34 Chatgilialoglu, C, Ferreri, C, Melchiorre, M, et al. (2014) Lipid geometrical isomerism: from chemistry to biology and diagnostics. Chem Rev 114, 255284.Google Scholar
35 Chatgilialoglu, C, Ferreri, C, Torreggiani, A, et al. (2011) Radiation-induced reductive modifications of sulfur-containing amino acids within peptides and proteins. J Proteomics 74, 22642273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Dietary suggestions for standardised consumption of gluten-free products

Figure 1

Fig. 1 The flow of participants through the study. CD, coeliac disease; GFD, gluten-free diet.

Figure 2

Table 2 Anthropometric and medical data of healthy controls and coeliac disease (CD) patients at diagnosis and after 1 year of gluten-free diet (GFD) intervention* (Mean values with their standard errors; n 20)

Figure 3

Table 3 Serum lipid concentrations in healthy controls and coeliac disease (CD) patients at diagnosis and after 1 year of gluten-free diet (GFD) intervention* (Mean values with their standard errors; n 20)

Figure 4

Table 4 Markers of systemic inflammation in healthy controls and coeliac disease (CD) patients at diagnosis and after 1 year of gluten-free diet (GFD) intervention* (Mean values with their standard errors, n 20)

Figure 5

Fig. 2 Distribution of IL-6 (a) and IL-8 (b) in healthy subjects (n 20) and coeliac disease (CD) patients on an unrestricted diet (n 20) and after 1 year of gluten-free diet (GFD) intervention (n 20). Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars (Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn's post hoc test). a,bMean values with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; Dunn's test).

Figure 6

Table 5 Lipidomic profile of erythrocyte membranes of healthy controls and coeliac disease (CD) patients at diagnosis and after 1 year of gluten-free diet (GFD) intervention* (Mean values with their standard errors, n 20)

Figure 7

Fig. 3 The standard de novo and elongation/desaturation reactions involved in fatty acid biosynthesis. The figure puts in evidence where coeliac disease (CD) patients differ from healthy subjects. The reduction of arachidonic acid (AA) concentrations in CD patients, restored by 1-year gluten-free diet intervention, suggests a different utilisation of dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (DGLA) as a substrate for other enzymes and a decrease in the conversion of DGLA into AA. FAS, fatty acid synthase; HETrE, hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid; LT, leukotrienes; PAF, platelet-activating factors; TXA, thromboxane. (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)