Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:38:39.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-Time Salmonella Detection Using Lead Zirconate Titanate-Titanium Microcantilevers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

John-Paul McGovern
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Wan Y. Shih
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Wei-Heng Shih
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Mauro Sergi
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19102
Irwin Chaiken
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19102
Get access

Abstract

Current methods for analysis of unknown powders in suspicious packages involve sending samples to laboratory facilities where a variety of time-consuming tests are performed. We have developed and investigated the use of a lead zirconate titanate - titanium (PZT-Ti) microcantilever for in situ detection of the common food- and water-born pathogen, Salmonella typhimurium. Using a bifunctional linking molecule to immobilize antibody on the titanium surface of the microcantilever, we can directly detect salmonella cells in suspensions of differing concentration. This novel surface functionalization technique along with the sub-nanogram sensitivity of the cantilever has allowed for direct quantification of S. typhimurium cells in suspension.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, Disease Information. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/diseaseinfo/salmonellosis_t.htm. Accessed, 6 Dec 2004.Google Scholar
2 Meehan, P. J., Rosenstein, N. E., Lillen, M., Meyer, R. F., Kiefer, M. J., Deitchman, S., Besser, R. E., Ehrenberg, R. L., Edwards, K. M., and Martinez, K. F., “Responding to Detection of Aerosolized Bacillus anthracis by Autonomous Detection Systems in the Workplace,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2004. 30 Apr (53, Early Release). 111.Google Scholar
3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Approved Tests for the Detection of Bacillus anthracis in the Laboratory Response Network (LRN),” Emergency Preparedness and Response. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/anthrax/lab-testing/approvedlrntests.asp. Accessed, 6 Dec 2004. Google Scholar
4 Bergmann, I. E., Neitzert, E., Malirat, V., Ortiz, S., Colling, A., Sanchez, C., and Correa Melo, E., “Rapid Serological Profiling by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and its Use as an Epidemiological Indicator of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Viral Activity.” Arch. Virol., 148(5):891901 (2003)Google Scholar
5 Welford, K., “Surface Plasmon Polaritons and Their Uses,” Optical Quantum Electronics, 23, 1 (1991)Google Scholar
6 Fung, Y. S. and Wong, Y. Y., “Self Assembled Monolayers as the Coating in a Quartz Piezoelectric Crystal Immunosensor To Detect Salmonella in Aqueous Solution,” Anal. Chem., 73, 53025309 (2001)Google Scholar
7 Wu, G., Datar, R. H., Hansen, K. M., Thundat, T., Cote, R. J., and Majumdar, A., “Bioassay of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Using Microcantilevers,” Nature Biotechnology, 19, 856860 (2001)Google Scholar
8 Shih, W. Y., Li, X., Gu, H., Shih, W.-H., and Aksay, I. A., “Simultaneous Liquid Viscosity and Density Determination with Piezoelectric Unimorph Cantilevers,” J. Appl. Phys., 89, 14971505 (2001)Google Scholar
9 Yi, J. W., Shih, W. Y., and Shih, W.-H., “Effect of Length, Width, and Mode on the Mass Detection Sensitivity of Piezoelectric Unimorph Cantilevers,” J. Appl. Phys., 91(3), 16801686 (2002)Google Scholar
10 Ratner, B. D., Hoffman, A. S., Schoen, F. J., and Lemons, J. E., Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine, 263, Academic Press, San Diego (1996)Google Scholar
11 Faust, V., “Biofunctionalized Biocompatible Titania Coatings for Implants,” Euro. Ceramics, VII. PT 1-3, 206–2, 15471550 (2002)Google Scholar
12 Arkles, B., “Tailoring Surfaces with Silanes.” Chemtech, 7, 766778 (1997)Google Scholar
13 Yakovleva, J., Davidsson, R., Lobanova, A., Bengtsson, M., Eremin, S., Laurell, T., and Emneus, J., “Microfluidic Enzyme Immunoassay using Silicon Microchip with Immobilized Antibodies and Chemiluminescence Detection,” Anal Chem., 74(13), 29943004 (2002)Google Scholar
14 Piehler, J., Brecht, A., Valiokas, R., Liedberg, B., and Gauglitz, G., “A High-Density poly(ethylene glycol) Polymer Brush for Immobilization on Glass-Type Surfaces,” Biosens. Bioelectron., 15(9–10), 473–81 (2000)Google Scholar
15 Yi, J. W., Shih, W. Y., Mutharasan, R., and Shih, W.–H., “In Situ Cell Detection Using Piezoelectric Lead Zirconia Titanate – Stainless Steel Cantilevers,” J. Appl. Phys., 93, 619625 (2003)Google Scholar