Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:34:21.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Echinoderm taphonomy, taphofacies, and Lagerstätten

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Carlton E. Brett ,
Heather A. Moffat  and
Wendy L. Taylor
Carlton E. Brett
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
Heather A. Moffat
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
Wendy L. Taylor
Affiliation:
Paleontological Research Institution, 1259 Trumansburg Road, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA
Get access

Abstract

Taphonomic study of echinoderms provides useful information on sedimentary conditions before, during, and after burial. Taphonomic studies of Recent echinoderms indicate that much skeletal disarticulation occurs within a few days after death. However, experiments also indicate that within a short period after death echinoderm carcasses remain rather resistant to disarticulation, and thus may be transported a considerable distance by currents; following periods of a few hours of decay, more delicate portions of echinoderm skeletons are readily disarticulated. Some skeletal modules (e.g., crinoid pluricolumnals) may resist disarticulation for periods of months in quiet- and or cool-water environments. Anoxia promotes intact preservation by excluding scavenging metazoans. Echinoderm ossicles may undergo minor abrasion and/or corrosion if left exposed, and less dense stereom corrodes much more rapidly than dense plates, such as echinoid spines. However, heavily abraded ossicles may indicate prefossilization and reworking.

Various groups of echinoderms (e.g., pelmatozoans, asterozoans, echinoids) have differing propensities for degradation and, therefore, produce different arrays of preserved fossil material primarily depending upon the relative rates of burial, bottom-water oxygenation, and turbulence. Echinoderms may be divided into three groups based upon the relative ease of skeletal disarticulation. Type 1 echinoderms include weakly articulated forms (e.g., asteroids and ophiuroids) that rapidly disintegrate into individual ossicles. Type 2 includes those echinoderms whose bodies contain portions in which are more tightly sutured, as well as portions in which the ossicles are somewhat more delicately bound (e.g., crinoids, regular echinoids). Such echinoderms display more varied taphonomic grades from fully intact to mixtures of isolated ossicles and articulated modules. Type 3 comprises those echinoderms (e.g., irregular echinoids) in which major portions of the skeleton are so resistant to disarticulation that they may be broken across sutures rather than coming apart at plate boundaries.

Comparative taphonomy of particular types of echinoderm skeletal remains leads to recognition of distinctive taphofacies that characterize particular depositional environments. Taphofacies include two types of characteristic modes of fossil preservation: event taphonomic signatures and background taphonomic signatures. Depending upon normal conditions of environmental energy and rates of sedimentation, the background condition of various types of echinoderms for a given facies may range from articulated, unabraded skeletal modules (in Types 2 and 3) to highly corroded and/or abraded ossicles. Conversely, the occurrence of fully intact fossil echinoderms provides unambiguous evidence of rapid and deep burial of benthic communities. Such well-preserved fossil assemblages can provide a wealth of information regarding the paleobiology of echinoderms, as well as the nature of the depositional events and burial histories.

This paper presents a preliminary classification and characterization of background and event aspects of echinoderm taphofacies for carbonate- (9 taphofacies, including reefs and hardgrounds) and siliciclastic-dominated (5 taphofacies) environments. In each case, we recognize a spectrum of echinoderm taphofacies that coincides with a gradient of environments, ranging from nearshore, high energy shoreface through proximal and distal storm-influenced shelf, to deeper ramp and dysoxic basinal settings. Most taphofacies also feature particular styles of obrution (smothered bottom) Lagerstätten. These range from scattered lenses of articulated fossils in some high energy sandstone and grainstone facies to bedding planes of articulated, pyrite coated specimens in dark shales. We classify and discuss the genesis of these types of Lagerstätten and list typical examples. Finally, we present a simple model that integrates the occurrence of various echinoderm taphofacies with concepts of cyclic and sequence stratigraphy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 3: Geobiology of Echinoderms , October 1997 , pp. 147 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aigner, T. 1985. Storm depositional systems: dynamic stratigraphy in modern and ancient shallow-marine sequences. Lecture Notes in the Earth Sciences 3. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 174 p.Google Scholar
Allison, P. A. 1990. Variation in rates of decay and disarticulation of Echinodermata: implications for the application of actualistic data. Palaios, 5:432–440.Google Scholar
Aronson, R. B. 1987. Predation on fossil and Recent ophiuroids. Paleobiology, 15:20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, R. B. 1989. Brittle-star bed: low predation anachronisms in the British Isles. Ecology, 70:856–865.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1997. Regional encrinites: a vanished lithofacies, p. 509–519. In Brett, C. E. and Baird, G. C. (eds.), Paleontological Events: Stratigraphic, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., Kammer, T. W., and Lane, N. G. 1979. Fossil communities of the Borden (Mississippian) delta in Indiana and northern Kentucky. Journal of Paleontology, 53:1182–1196.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Meyer, D. L. 1990. Origin and composition of carbonate buildups and associated facies in the Fort Payne Formation (Lower Mississippian, south-central Kentucky): an integrated sedimentologic and paleoecologic analysis. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 102:129–146.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Sevastopulo, G. D. 1994. Taphonomy of Lower Carboniferous crinoids from the Hook Head Formation, Ireland. Lethaia, 27:245–256.Google Scholar
Banerjee, I., and Kidwell, S. M. 1991. Significance of molluscan shell beds in sequence stratigraphy: an example from the Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group of Canada. Sedimentology, 38:913–934.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1918. The fossil and its environment. Geological Society of London Quarterly Journal, 64: 61–98.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T. 1997. Crinoid functional morphology, p. 45–68. In Waters, J. A. and Maples, C. G. (eds.), Geobiology of Echinoderms. Paleontological Society Papers, 3.Google Scholar
Baumiller, T., and Ausich, W. I., 1992. The broken-stick model as a null hypothesis for fossil crinoid stalk taphonomy and as a guide for distribution of connective tissue in fossils. Paleobiology, 18:288–298.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. A. 1975. Traces of predation, p. 261–281. In Frey, R. W. (ed.), The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Bottjer, D. J., and Droser, M. L. 1994. The history of Phanerozoic bioturbation, p. 155–178. In Donovan, S. K. (ed.), The Paleobiology of Trace Fossils. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Brandt, D. S. 1989. Taphonomic grades as a classification for fossiliferous assemblages and implications for paleoecology. Palaios, 4:303–309.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1985. Pelmatozoan echinoderms on Silurian bioherms, in western New York and Ontario. Journal of Paleontology, 59:820–838.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1991. Organism-sediment relationships in Silurian marine environments, p. 301–344. In Bassett, M. G., Lane, P. D., and Edwards, D., (eds.), The Murchison Symposium: Proceedings of an International Symposium on the Silurian System. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 44.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1995. Sequence stratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and taphonomy in shallow marine environments. Palaios, 10:597–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Baird, G. 1986. Comparative taphonomy: a key to paleoenvironmental interpretation based on fossil preservation. Palaios, 1:207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Baird, G. 1993. Taphonomic approaches to time resolution in stratigraphy: examples from Paleozoic marine mudrocks, p. 250–274. In Kidwell, S. M. and Behrensmeyer, A. K. (eds.), Taphonomic Approaches to Time Resolution in Fossil Assemblages. Paleontological Society Short Courses in Paleontology 6. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Baird, G. 1997. Epiboles, outages, and ecological evolutionary bioevents: taphonomy, ecological, and biogeographic factors, p. 249–284. In Brett, C. E. and Baird, G. C. (eds.), Paleontological Events: Stratigraphic, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Brookfield, M. E. 1984. Morphology, faunas, and genesis of Ordovician hardgrounds from southern Ontario, Canada. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 46:233–290.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Eckert, J. D. 1982. Palaeoecology of a well-preserved crinoid colony from the Silurian Rochester Shale in Ontario. Royal Ontario Museum Life Sciences Contributions, 131.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Liddell, W. D. 1978. Preservation and paleoecology of a Middle Ordovician hardground community. Paleobiology, 4:329–348.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Seilacher, A. 1991. Fossil-Lagerstätten: a taphonomic consequence of event sedimentation, p. 283–297. In Einsele, G., Ricken, W., and Seilacher, A. (eds.), Cycles and Events in Stratigraphy. Springer Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., and Taylor, W. L. 1997. The Homocrinus beds: Silurian crinoid Lagerstätten of western New York and southern Ontario, p. 181–223. In Brett, C. E. and Baird, G. C. (eds.), Paleontological Events: Stratigraphic, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1974. Crinoids from the Girardeau Limestone (Ordovician). Palaeontolographica Americana, 7:259–499.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C. 1995. Eoparisocrinid crinoids from the Middle Ordovician (Galena Group) of northern Iowa and southern Minnesota. Journal of Paleontology, 69:351–366.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C., and Veinus, J. 1974. Middle Ordovician crinoids from southwestern Virginia and eastern Tennessee. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 66:283–300.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C., and Veinus, J. 1978. Middle Ordovician crinoids from the Twin Cities area of Minnesota. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 74:369–506.Google Scholar
Callender, W. R., Powell, E. N., Staff, G. M., and Davies, D. J. 1992. Distinguishing autochthony, parautochthony, and allochthony using taphofacies analysis: can cold seep assemblages be discriminated from assemblages of the nearshore and continental shelf? Palaios, 7:409–421.Google Scholar
Clifton, H. E. 1986. Interpretation of paleoenergy levels from sediment deposited on ancient wave-dominated shelves. In Knight, J. (ed.), Shelf sands and sandstones. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, 2.Google Scholar
Dodd, J. R., Alexander, R. R., and Stanton, R. J. Jr. 1985. Population dynamics in Dendraster, Merriamaster, and Anadara from the Neogene of the Kettleman Hills, California. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 52:61–76.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. 1991. The taphonomy of echinoderms: calcareous multi-element skeletons in the marine environment, p. 241–269. In Donovan, S. K. (ed.), The Processes of Fossilization. Belhaven Press, London.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K., and Pickerill, R. K. 1995. Crinoid columns preserved in life position in the Silurian of Arisaig, Nova Scotia. Palaios, 10:362–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, S. K., Pickerill., R. K., Mikulic, D. G., and Kluessendorf, J. 1996. Upright crinoid stems of the Thornton Reef, Wenlock (Silurian) of Illinois, USA. Geological Journal, 31:369–378.Google Scholar
Droser, M. L., and Bottjer, D. J. 1993. Trends and patterns of Phanerozoic ichnofabrics. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 21:204–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1978. Polymorphism in the Pliocene sand dollar Merriamaster (Echinoidea). Journal of Paleontology, 52:275–286.Google Scholar
Ekdale, A. A., Bromley, R. G., and Pemberton, S. G. 1984. Ichnology. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Short Course 15.Google Scholar
Feldman, H. R. 1989. Taphonomic processes in the Waldron Shale, Silurian, southern Indiana. Palaios, 4:144–156.Google Scholar
Flessa, K. W., and Brown, T. J. 1983. Selective solution of macroinvertebrate calcareous hard parts: a laboratory study. Lethaia, 16:193–205.Google Scholar
Franzën, C. 1977. Crinoid holdfasts from the Silurian of Gotland. Lethaia, 10:219–234.Google Scholar
Franzën, C. 1982. A Silurian crinoid thanatope from Gotland. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 103:439–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frest, T. J., Brett, C. E., and Witzke, B. J. in press. Caradocian–Gedinnian echinoderm association of central and eastern North America. In Boucot, A. J. and Lawson, J. (eds.), Final Report of Project Ecostratigraphy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldring, R. 1978. Devonian: (37 Upper Devonian Clastic Shelf Community), p. 140–143. In McKerrow, W. S. (ed.), The Ecology of Fossils: An Illustrated Guide. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 384 p.Google Scholar
Goldring, R., and Langenstrassen, F. 1979. Open shelf and near-shore clastic facies in the Devonian. Palaeontological Association Special Papers in Palaeontology, 23:81–97.Google Scholar
Goldring, R., and Stephenson, D. C. 1972. The depositional environment of three starfish beds. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, 1972 (10):611–624.Google Scholar
Goldring, W. 1923. Devonian Crinoids of New York. New York State Memoir 16, 670 p.Google Scholar
Greenstein, B. J. 1989. Mass mortality of the West-Indian echinoid Diadema antillarum (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): a natural experiment in taphonomy. Palaios, 4:487–492.Google Scholar
Greenstein, B. J. 1991. An integrated study of echinoid taphonomy: predictions for the fossil record of four echinoid families. Palaios, 6:519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, B. J. 1992. Taphonomic bias and the evolutionary history of the family Cidaridae (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Paleobiology, 18:50–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guensburg, T. E. 1984. Echinoderms of the Lebanon Limestone, central Tennessee. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 86 (319), 100 p.Google Scholar
Guensburg, T. E. 1992. Paleoecology of hardground encrusting and commensal crinoids, Middle Ordovician, Tennessee. Journal of Paleontology, 66:129–147.Google Scholar
Hagdorn, H. 1985. Immigrations of crinoids into the German Muschelkalk basin. p. 237–254. In Bayer, U. and Seilacher, A. (eds.), Sedimentary and Evolutionary Cycles. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1.Google Scholar
Halleck, M. S. 1973. Crinoids, hardgrounds, and community succession: the Silurian Laurel–Waldron contact in southern Indiana. Lethaia, 6:239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemleben, C., and Swinburne, N. H. M. 1991. Cyclical deposition of the plattenkalk facies. p. 572–591. In Einsele, G., Ricken, W., and Seilacher, A. (eds.), Cycles and Events in Stratigraphy. Springer Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. 1988. Taphonomic effects of sea-floor exposure on an Ordovician brachiopod assemblage. Palaios, 3:588–597.Google Scholar
Holterhoff, P. F. 1997. Filtration models, guilds, and biofacies: Crinoid paleoecology of the Stanton Formation (Upper Pennsylvanian), midcontinent, North America. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 130:177–208.Google Scholar
Horowitz, A. S., and Waters, J. A. 1972. A Mississippian echinoderm site in Alabama. Journal of Paleontology, 46:660–665.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. 1982. Fossil communities of the prodeltaic New Providence Shale Member of the Borden Formation (Mississippian), north-central Kentucky and southern Indiana. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University, 301 p.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. 1978. Cretaceous (Santonian Micraster Chalk Community), p. 106–107. In McKerrow, W. S. (ed.), The Ecology of Fossils: An Illustrated Guide. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 384 p.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M. 1991. The stratigraphy of shell concentrations, p. 211–290. In Allison, P. A. and Briggs, D. E. G. (eds.), Taphonomy: Releasing the Data Locked in the Fossil Record. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. M., and Baumiller, T. 1990. Experimental disintegration of regular echinoids: roles of temperature, oxygen, and decay thresholds. Paleobiology, 16:247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kier, P. M. 1977a. The poor fossil record of the regular echinoid. Paleobiology, 3:168–174.Google Scholar
Kier, P. M. 1977b. Triassic echinoids. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 30:1–80.Google Scholar
Koch, D. L., and Strimple, H. L. 1968. A new Upper Devonian cystoid attached to a discontinuity surface, p. 1–49. Iowa Geological Survey Report of Investigations 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolata, D. R. 1986. Crinoids from the Champlainian (Middle Ordovician) Guttenburg Formation—upper Mississippi Valley region. Journal of Paleontology, 60:711–718.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1963. The Berkeley crinoid collection from Crawfordsville, Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 37:1001–1008.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1969. Crinoids and reefs. Proceedings of the First North American Paleontological Convention, 1:1430–1443.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1973. Paleontology and paleoecology of the Crawfordsville fossil site (Upper Osagian, Indiana). University of California Special Publications in Geological Sciences 99, 141 p.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G., and Ausich, W. I. 1995. Interreef crinoid faunas from the Mississinewa Shale Member of the Wabash Formation (northern Indiana; Silurian; Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 69:1090–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, D., and Pope, J. K. 1989. Upper Ordovician tempestites from Swatara Gap, Pennsylvania: depositional processes affecting sediments and paleoecology of fossil faunas. Palaios, 4:553–564.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. 1980. Taphonomy, p.40–58. In Broadhead, T. W. and Waters, J. A. (eds.), Echinoderms: Notes for a Short Course. University of Tennessee Department of Geological Sciences, Studies in Geology 3.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. 1986. Relative rates of skeletal disarticulation in modern ophiuroids and Paleozoic crinoids. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 18:672.Google Scholar
Liddell, W. D. 1975. Recent crinoid biostratinomy. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 7:1169.Google Scholar
Liddell, W. D., and Brett, C. E. 1982. Skeletal overgrowths among epizoans from the Silurian (Wenlockian) Waldron Shale. Paleobiology, 8:67–78.Google Scholar
Linck, O. 1965. Stratigraphische, stratinomische und ökologisches Betrachtung zu Encrinus lilliformis Lamarck. Jahrbuch Geologie Landsesamt, Bad-Wurtemburg, 7:123–148.Google Scholar
LoDuca, S. K., and Brett, C. E. 1997. The Medusaegraptus epibole and lower Ludlovian Konservat-Lagerstätten of eastern North America, p. 369–406. In Brett, C. E. and Baird, G. C. (eds.), Paleontological Events: Stratigraphic, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, H. 1957. Niagaran reefs in the Great Lakes area, p. 215–248. In Ladd, H. (ed.), Treatise on Marine Ecology and Paleoecology. Geological Society of America Memoir, 67.Google Scholar
McIntosh, G. 1978. Pseudoplanktonic crinoid colonies attached to Upper Devonian logs. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 10(7):453.Google Scholar
Messing, C. G. 1997. Living comatulids, p. 3–30. In Waters, J. A. and Maples, C. G. (eds.), Geobiology of Echinoderms. Paleontological Society Papers, 3.Google Scholar
Meyer, C. A. 1988. Palaookolgie, Biofazies und Sedimentologie von Seeliliengemeinschaften aus dem unteren Hauptrogenstein des Nordwestschweizer Jura. Revista Paleobiologica, 7:359–433.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. 1971. Post-mortem disintegration of Recent crinoids and ophiuroids under natural conditions. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 3:645–646.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. 1990. Population paleoecology and comparative taphonomy of two edrioasteroid (Echinodermata) pavements: Upper Ordovician of Kentucky and Ohio. Historical Biology, 4:155–178.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., and Meyer, K. B. 1986. Biostratinomy of Recent crinoids (Echinodermata) at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Palaios, 1:294–302.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L., Ausich, W. I., and Terry, R. I. 1989. Comparative taphonomy of echinoderms in carbonate facies: Fort Payne Formation (Lower Mississippian) of Kentucky and Tennessee. Palaios, 4:533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffat, H. A. 1996. Structure and origin of echinoid beds: unique biogenic deposits in the stratigraphic record. , University of Southern California, 200 p.Google Scholar
Müller, A. H. 1979. Fossilization (taphonomy), p. 2–78. In Robison, R. A. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part A, Introduction. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
O'Brien, N. J., Brett, C. E., and Taylor, W. L. 1994. The significance of microfabric and taphonomic analysis in determining sedimentary processes in marine mudrocks: Examples from the Silurian of New York. Journal of Sedimentary Research, Section A: A64: 847–852.Google Scholar
Parsons, K.M., Powell, E.N., Brett, C.E., Walker, S. E., Raymond, A., Callender, R., and Staff, G. 1997. Experimental taphonomy on the continental shelf and slope. Procedings of the 8th International Coral Reef Symposium, Panama City, Panama.Google Scholar
Pemberton, S. G., and MacEachern, J. A. 1997. The ichnological signature of storm deposits: the use of trace fossils in event stratigraphy, p. 73–109. In Brett, C. E. and Baird, G. C. (eds.), Paleontological Events: Stratigraphic, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Powell, E. N., Brett, C. E., Walker, E. S., Raymond, A., Callender, R., Rowe, G., Staff, G., and Parsons, K. 1995. The SSETI program (Shelf and Slope Experimental Taphonomy Initiative): description and progress report. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 27(6):45.Google Scholar
Powell, E. N., Staff, G. M., Davies, D. J., and Callender, W. R. 1989. Macrobenthic death assemblages in modern marine environments: Formation, interpretation and application. Critical Reviews in Aquatic Sciences, 1:555–589.Google Scholar
Roeser, E. W. 1986. A Lower Mississippian (Kinderhookian–Osagian) crinoid fauna from the Cuyahoga Formation of northeastern Ohio. , University of Cincinnati, 322 p.Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, D. 1971. Zur Sedimentologie und Okölogie von Echinodermen-Lagerstätten. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 138:221–258.Google Scholar
Sadler, M., and Lewis, R. D. 1996. Actualistic studies of the taphonomy and ichnology of the irregular echinoid Meoma ventricosa at San Salvador, Bahamas. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 28:293–294.Google Scholar
Sass, D., and Chondrate, R. A. 1985. Destruction of a Late Devonian ophiuroid assemblage: a victim of changing ecology at the Catskill delta front, p. 237–263. In Woodrow, D. L. and Sevon, W. D. (eds.), The Catskill Delta. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 201.Google Scholar
Schäfer, W. 1972. Ecology and Palaeoecology of Marine Environments. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 568 p.Google Scholar
Schumacher, G. A., and Ausich, W. I. 1983. New Upper Ordovician echinoderm site: Bull Fork Formation, Caesar Creek Reservoir (Warren County, Ohio). Ohio Journal of Science, 83: 60–64.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1968. Origin and diagenesis of the Oriskany Sandstone (Lower Devonian, Appalachians) as reflected in its fossil shells, p. 175–185. In Recent Developments in Sedimentology in Central Europe. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1973. Biostratinomy: the sedimentology of biologically standardized particles, p. 159–177. In Ginsburg, R. N. (ed.), Evolving Concepts in Sedimentology. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1982. General remarks about event deposits. p. 161–174. In Einsele, G. and Seilacher, A. (eds.), Cyclic and Event Stratification. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A., and Hemleben, C. 1966. Spürenfauna und Bildungstiefe der Hunsrückschiefer (Unterdevon). Notizblatt Landesamt Bodenforschung, 94:40–53.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A., Reif, W. E., and Westphal, F. 1985. Sedimentological, ecological and temporal patterns of fossil-Lagerstätten, p. 5–23. In Whittington, H. B. and Conway Morris, S. (eds.), Extraordinary Biotas: Their Ecological and Evolutionary Significance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 311.Google Scholar
Sellwood, B. W. 1978. Jurassic. [70. Calcarenite Community, 71 Hardground Community; 72 Carbonate Mud Community, 79 Shelly Lime Mud Community], p. 220–230, 246–248. In McKerrow, W. S. (ed.), The Ecology of Fossils: An Illustrated Guide. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 384 p.Google Scholar
Simms, M. J. 1986. Contrasting lifestyles in Lower Jurassic crinoids: a comparison of benthic and pseudopelagic Isocrinida. Palaeontology, 29:475–493.Google Scholar
Speyer, S. E., and Brett, C. E. 1986. Trilobite taphonomy and Middle Devonian taphofacies. Palaios, 1:312–327.Google Scholar
Speyer, S. E., and Brett, C. E. 1988. Taphofacies models for epeiric sea environments: Middle Paleozoic examples. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 63:225–262.Google Scholar
Speyer, S. E., and Brett, C. E. 1991. Taphonomic controls: background and episodic processes in fossil assemblage preservation, p. 502–546. In Allison, P. A. and Briggs, D. E. G. (eds.), Taphonomy: Releasing the Data Locked in the Fossil Record. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Springer, F. 1911. On a Trenton echinoderm fauna at Kirkfield, Ontario. Canadian Department of Mines, Geological Survey Branch, 69 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, F. 1926. American Silurian Crinoids. Smithsonian Institution Publication 2871, 239p.Google Scholar
Sprinkle, J. 1973. Morphology and evolution of blastozoan echinoderms. Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology Special Publication, 283 p.Google Scholar
Sprinkle, J. 1982. Echinoderm faunas of the Bromide Formation (Middle Ordovician) of Oklahoma. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Monograph, 1, 369 p.Google Scholar
Sprinkle, J., and Guensburg, T. E. 1995. Origin of echinoderms in the Paleozoic evolutionary fauna: the role of substrates. Palaios, 10:437–453.Google Scholar
Sprinkle, J., and Gutschick, R. C. 1967. Costatoblastus, a channel fill blastoid from the Sappington Formation of Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 41:385–402.Google Scholar
Taylor, W., and Brett, C. E. 1996. Taphonomy and paleoecology of echinoderm Lagerstätten from the Silurian (Wenlockian) Rochester Shale. Palaios, 11:118–140.Google Scholar
Tetreault, D. K. 1995. An unusual Silurian arthropod/echinoderm dominated soft-bodied fauna from the Eramosa Member (Ludlow) of the Guelph Formation, southern Bruce Peninsula, Ontario, Canada. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 27(6):A-114.Google Scholar
Watkins, R. 1991. Guild structure and tiering in a high-diversity Silurian community, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. Palaios, 6:465–478.Google Scholar
Watkins, R. 1993. The Silurian (Wenlockian) reef fauna of southeast Wisconsin. Palaios, 8:325–338.Google Scholar
Wells, J. W. 1941. Crinoids and Callixylon. American Journal of Science, 239:454–456.Google Scholar
Whiteley, T. E., Brett, C. E., and Lehmann, D. M. 1993. The Walcott-Rust quarry: a unique Ordovician trilobite Konservatte-Lagerstätte. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 25(2):89.Google Scholar