No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Cultural Construction of Space and Migration in Paiwan, Taiwan
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 February 2019
Abstract
The establishment and use of space is a culturally constructed dimension of the human experience that is figurative, metaphorical, and analogical in nature. Such phenomena are mapped and encoded in people's spatial and cultural cognition and they are constituted and reconstituted during moments of migration onto new lands. In this paper it is argued that analysing the spatial dimensions that are enacted by a social group during its migration offers scholars a means to ascertain the metaphorical meaning of the lives of its members. Examining such processes also enables archaeologists to identify and interpret the nature of cultural continuity during such movements. The paper presents the results of examining the nature of cultural continuity in the configurations and patterns of ancient house structures and settlements that were established and then abandoned by the Kaushi, a Paiwan group in southern Taiwan, as they migrated and colonized and created a new cultural landscape.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2019
References
Chen, M., 2008. Settlement patterns at Saqacengalj, a slate house settlement in southern Taiwan. Asian Perspectives 47(2), 210–41.Google Scholar
Chen, M., 2008. 2010. Interpreting the social meaning of different shapes of house structures by examining the flow of resources: a case study in Saqacengalj, the southern tip of Taiwan. Archaeometry 52(6), 1057–78.Google Scholar
Chen, M., 2008. 2012. Interpreting social differentiation by examining the house and settlement patterns and the flow of resources: a case study of Paiwan slate house settlements in southern Taiwan. Asian Perspectives 50(1&2), 107–31.Google Scholar
Chiang, B. 蔣斌主編 (ed.), 2002. 《番族慣習調查報告書 第五卷 排灣族》, 台灣總督府臨時台灣舊貫調查會原著, 中央研究院民族學研究所。[An Investigatory Report on Aboriginal Tradition, Volume 5: Paiwan Group]. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Chiang, B. & Li, C. 〈排灣族家屋的空間結構與意義〉，黃應貴編，《空間、力與社會》，pp. 167–212，中央研究院民族學研究所。[The spatial organization and meaning of household of the Paiwan group], in Space, Power, and Society, ed. Huang, Y.K.. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 167–212.Google Scholar
Chijilwa, S. 千千岩助太郎, 1937. 《台灣高砂族住家の研究，第一報(總論，排灣族)》，台灣建築會出版。[Studies on the House Structure of Taiwanese Aboriginal Groups: Paiwan Group]. Taipei: Society of Taiwan Architecture.Google Scholar
Donald, M., 1998. Material culture and cognition: concluding thoughts, in Cognition and Material Culture: the Archaeology of Symbolic Storage, eds. Renfrew, C. & Scarre, C.. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeology, 181–7.Google Scholar
Giddens, A., 1984. The Constitution of Society: An outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gosden, C., 2001. Postcolonial archaeology: issues of culture, identity, and knowledge, in Archaeological Theory Today, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Polity Press, 241–61.Google Scholar
Hsu, S. 許勝發, 1996《傳統排灣族群北部式家屋裝飾初步研究》，成功大學建築所碩士論文。[An Initiate Study on Traditional Household Decoration of North Paiwan]. Unpublished thesis, National Cheng Kung University.Google Scholar
Huang, C. 黃俊銘, 1982. 排灣族北部型住屋變遷之研究》，成功大學建築所碩士論文。[A Study On the Change in House Structure of Northern Paiwan]. Unpublished thesis, National Cheng Kung University.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. 黃應貴, 1995. 《空間、力與社會》，台北：中央研究院民族學研究所。[Space, Power, and Society]. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Kuo, S., Cheng, C., Lin, B.-C., Huang, C. & Hu, J.-C. 郭素秋 鄭玠甫 林伯丞 黃鍾 胡植慶, 2017. 〈空載光達技術在台灣山區舊社考古學研究的應用：以排灣族文樂舊社為例〉，《考古人類學刊》，88, 1–22。[Application of airborne LiDAR to the archaeological study of abandoned indigenous settlements in mountain areas – a case study of the Wunlou site of the Paiwan group, Taiwan]. Journal of Archaeology and Anthropology 88, 1–22.Google Scholar
Kuo, T. 郭東雄, 2003. 《台灣排灣族七佳舊社住居文化之研究》。國立臺南師範學院鄉土文化研究所碩士論文。[The Study on House and Culture of Chi-chai: An Old Paiwan Settlement]. Unpublished thesis, National Tainan Normal College.Google Scholar
Li, C. 李靜怡, 1994. 《排灣族舊來義社住屋的復原與詮釋》，東海大學建築所碩士論文。[The Reconstruction and Interpretation of the House Structure of Laiyi Abandoned Settlement, Paiwan Group]. Unpublished thesis, Tunghai University.Google Scholar
Li, Y. & Wu, C. 李亦園、文崇一, 1982. 《台灣山地建築文化：台灣山地文化園區規劃報告第二冊》，中央研究院民族學研究所。 [The Architectural Cultures of Taiwanese Aborigines: A report on the design of the cultural exhibition area of Taiwanese aborigine]. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Lin, H. 林宏益, 1994. 《生存空間的澄明與詮釋--以排灣族caia?abus 社為例》，東海大學建築所碩士論文。[Verification and Interpretation of Living Space—Case Study on Caia?abus, Paiwan]. Unpublished thesis, Tunghai University.Google Scholar
Preucel, R.W. & Meskell, L., 2007. Places, in A Companion to Social Archaeology, eds. Meskell, L. & Preucel, R.W.. Oxford: Blackwell, 215–29.Google Scholar
Ortman, S.G., 2000. Conceptual metaphor in the archaeological record: methods and an example from the American southwest. American Antiquity 65(4), 613–45.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. & Alt, S., 2003. Mound, memory, and contested Mississippian history, in Archaeology of Memory, eds. Van Dyke, R.M. & Alcock, S.E.. London: Routledge, 151–79.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape: People, paths, and monuments. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tung, C.-F. 童春發, 2011. 《排灣族擬人化的命名土地制度：三個遺址地名的田野調查與文化詮釋》，國立臺灣史前文化博物館。[Humanized Place Names and Land Use Systems: Cultural interpretation of three Paiwan village sites]. Taitung: National Museum of Prehistory.Google Scholar
Wu, M. & Chen, M., 2016. GIS as a heuristic tool: revisiting spatial concepts in the Paiwan landscape, paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Orlando, USA, 5–10 April, 2016.Google Scholar