Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:47:23.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does being a foreigner shape judicial behaviour? Evidence from the Constitutional Court of Andorra, 1993–2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2017

NUNO GAROUPA*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University School of Law; Católica Global School of Law, Lisbon

Abstract

Different personal attributes have been considered to account for judicial policy preferences around the world: ideology, age, gender, race, religion, language and professional background. The appointment of foreign judges is a particularly rare characteristic since most countries do not entertain such a possibility. We use the specific case of the Constitutional Court of Andorra to test the extent to which foreign-appointed judges make a difference, and particularly whether they are more or less inclined to favour local petitioners. An empirical analysis of the entire population of abstract review cases in the period 1993–2016 does not indicate a strong statistical effect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, D., Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S. (2012), ‘Do judges vary in their treatment of race?’ Journal of Legal Studies 41 (2): 347–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral Garcia, S. and Garoupa, N. (2017), ‘Judicial politics at the Privy Council: empirical evidence, 1998–2011’, Review of Law and Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O., Eisenberg, T., and Schwab, S. J. (1995), ‘Politics and judiciary: the influence of judicial background on case outcomes’, Journal of Legal Studies 24: 257–81.Google Scholar
Blake, W. (2012), ‘God Save this Honorable Court: Religion as a source of judicial policy preferences’, Political Research Quarterly 65 (4): 814–26.Google Scholar
Boyd, C. L., Epstein, L., and Martin, A. D. (2010), ‘Untangling the causal effects of sex on judging’, American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 389411.Google Scholar
Carrubba, C. J., Gabel, M., and Hankla, C. (2008), ‘Judicial behavior under political constraints: evidence from the European Court of Justice’, American Political Science Review 102 (4): 435–52.Google Scholar
Dalla Pellegrina, L., de Mot, J., Faure, M., and Garoupa, N. (2017), ‘Litigating federalism: an empirical analysis of the Belgian Constitutional Court decisions’, European Journal of Constitutional Law, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Epstein, L., Landes, W., and Posner, R. (2013), The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fischman, J. B. and Law, D. S. (2009), ‘What is judicial ideology, and how do we measure it?’ Washington Journal of Law and Policy 29: 133213.Google Scholar
Garoupa, N. (2011), ‘Empirical legal studies and constitutional courts’, Indian Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (1): 2654.Google Scholar
Garoupa, N. and Ginsburg, T. (2015), Judicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lim, C. S. H. (2013), ‘Preferences and incentives of appointed and elected public officials: Evidence from state trial court judges’, American Economic Review 103 (4): 1360–97.Google Scholar
Posner, R. (2008), How Judges Think, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2008).Google Scholar
Voigt, S., Ebeling, M. W., and Blume, L. (2007), ‘Improving credibility by delegating judicial competence – the case of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council’, Journal of Development Economics 82: 348–73.Google Scholar
Welch, S., Combs, M., and Gruhl, J. (1988), ‘Do black judges make a difference?’ American Journal of Political Science 32 (1): 126–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar