Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T00:23:49.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Angle Resolved Photoemission from Ultrathin Films of Cu/Ni(001)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

K. Subramanian ,
G. J. Mankey ,
R. L. Stockbauer  and
R. L. Kurtz
K. Subramanian
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803., krishnan@rouge.phys.lsu.edu
G. J. Mankey
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803., krishnan@rouge.phys.lsu.edu
R. L. Stockbauer
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803., krishnan@rouge.phys.lsu.edu
R. L. Kurtz
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803., krishnan@rouge.phys.lsu.edu
Get access

Abstract

We present a study of the quantum well states observed in Cu/Ni(001). Several reports in the recent past have shown that these states, which are derived from the bulk, disperse through the Fermi level at a thickness of about 6 ML. Using angle-resolved photoemission, we have imaged the photoelectron angular distributions from several thicknesses of Cu/Ni(001). We observe that these states have s,p like symmetry and are located near the zone edge.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 427: Symposium K – Advanced Metallization for Future ULSI , 1996 , 59
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Stockbauer, R. L. and Pararas, A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 266, p.560 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Rieger, D., Schnell, R. D., Steinmann, W. and Saile, V.. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 208, p. 327 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Eastman., D. E. Donelon, J. J., Hien, N. C. and Himpsel, F. J., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 172, p. 327 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Stockbauer, R. L.. Ajmera, P., Poliakoff, E. D., Craft, B. C. and Saile, V.. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 291, p.505 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Carbone, C., Vescovo, E., Rader, O., Gudat, W. and Eberhardt, W., Phy. Rev. Lett. 71, p.2805 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Garrison, K., Chang, Y and Johnson, P. D., Phy. Rev. Lett. 71, p.2801 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Johnson., P. D. Garrison, K., Dong, Q., Smith, N. V., Li, Dongqi, Mattson, J., Pearson, J. and Bader, S. D., Phys. Rev. B 50, 8954 (1994).Google Scholar