Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:51:00.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Influencing Corn (Zea mays) Tolerance to Trifluralin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Frank C. Roggenbuck  and
Donald Penner
Frank C. Roggenbuck
Affiliation:
Pestic. Res. Ctr., Dep. Crop & Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Pestic. Res. Ctr., Dep. Crop & Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corn (Zea mays L.) can be injured by carry-over of trifluralin [2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl) benzenamine] in the soil from one crop year to the next. Factors influencing corn tolerance to carry-over concentrations of trifluralin in the soil were studied in controlled-environment chambers and greenhouse experiments. For several hybrids, greater injury occurred at low than at high temperatures. This injury was especially evident for ‘Pioneer 3320’ and ‘Pioneer 3572’ when the soil moisture was at 100% field capacity. Addition of phosphorus fertilizer appeared to have no influence upon trifluralin injury but did interact with alachlor [2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamide]. Alachlor plus trifluralin injured corn in an apparently additive manner. Significant differences were found in genetic tolerance of corn to trifluralin within a group of hybrids. Tolerance of specific hybrids to trifluralin was altered by environmental conditions.

Keywords

Zea maysgenetic variabilityalachlorphosphorustemperaturesoil moisture
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 89 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, R. S. Jr. 1965. Phosphorus fertilization and phytotoxicity of simazine. Weeds 13:113–116.Google Scholar
2. Andersen, R. N. 1964. Differential response of corn inbreds to simazine and atrazine. Weeds 12:60–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Andersen, R. N. and Geadelmann, J. L. 1979. Varietal influence on control of volunteer corn with diclofop. Agric. Res. Results, Sci. Educ. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric. ARR-NC-1. 8 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bode, L. E., Day, C. L., Gebhardt, M. R., and Goering, C. E. 1973. Prediction of trifluralin diffusion coefficients. Weed Sci. 21:485–489.Google Scholar
5. Bucholtz, D. L. and Lavy, T. L. 1978. Pesticide interactions in oats (Avena sativa L. ‘Neal’). J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:520–524.Google Scholar
6. Burnside, O. C. 1972. Tolerance of soybean cultivars to weed competition and herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:294–297.Google Scholar
7. Burnside, O. C. 1974. Trifluralin dissipation in soil following repeated annual applications. Weed Sci. 22:374–377.Google Scholar
8. Carlson, W. C. and Wax, L. M. 1970. Factors influencing the phytotoxicity of chloroxuron. Weed Sci. 18:98–101.Google Scholar
9. Davis, J. L., Abernathy, J. R., and Wiese, A. F. 1978. Tolerance of 52 corn lines to trifluralin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:123.Google Scholar
10. Doll, J. D., Penner, D., and Meggitt, W. F. 1970. Herbicide and phosphorus influence on root absorption of amiben and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:357–359.Google Scholar
11. Fedorovskii, D. V. 1965. Methods for determination of some physical and moisture properties of soil used in field and potculture experiments. Pages 453–521 in Agrochemical Methods in Study of Soils. Academy of Sciences of USSR, V. V. Doluchaev Inst. Soil Sci. Google Scholar
12. Fink, R. J. 1972. Effects of tillage method and incorporation on trifluralin carryover injury. Agron. J. 64:75–77.Google Scholar
13. Geadelmann, J. L. and Andersen, R. N. 1977. Inheritance of tolerance to Hoe 23408 in corn. Crop Sci. 17:601–603.Google Scholar
14. Hardcastle, W. S. and Wilkinson, R. E. 1970. Bioassay of herbicide combinations with rice. Weed Sci. 18:336–337.Google Scholar
15. Helling, C. S. 1976. Dinitroaniline herbicides in soils. J. Environ. Qual. 5:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Horowitz, M. and Herzlinger, G. 1973. Interactions between residual herbicides at low concentrations. Weed Res. 13:367–372.Google Scholar
17. Jacques, G. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1979. Dinitroaniline herbicide phytotoxicity as influenced by soil moisture and herbicide vaporization. Weed Sci. 27:536–539.Google Scholar
18. Jacques, G. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1979. Persistence of dinitroaniline herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 27:660–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Lambert, S. M. 1966. The influence of soil-moisture content on herbicidal response. Weeds 14:273–275.Google Scholar
20. Marriage, P. B. 1974. Lack of interaction of herbicides in annual grasses. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54:591–593.Google Scholar
21. Marth, P. C. and Davis, F. F. 1945. Relation of temperature to the selective herbicidal effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Bot. Gaz. 106:463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Muzik, T. J. and Mauldin, W. G. 1964. Influence of environment on the response of plants to herbicides. Weeds 12:142–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Narsaiah, D. B. and Harvey, R. G. 1977. Differential responses of corn inbreds and hybrids to alachlor. Crop Sci. 17:657–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Niccum, C. E. 1970. Variations in inbred and varietal tolerance to butylate, alachlor and propachlor. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 25:33–35.Google Scholar
25. Parka, S. J. and Soper, O. F. 1977. The physiology and mode of action of the dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 25:79–87.Google Scholar
26. Penner, D. 1971. Effect of temperature on phytotoxicity and root uptake of several herbicides. Weed Sci. 19:571–576.Google Scholar
27. Rahman, A., Manson, B. E., Burney, B., and Matthews, L. J. 1975. Effects of phosphorus on the phytotoxicity and residual activity of trifluralin. Proc. 5th Asian–Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. Conf., Tokyo, Japan. Pages 162–166.Google Scholar
28. Roggenbuck, F. C. and Penner, D. 1982. Evaluation of hybrid and inbred corn tolerance to trifluralin residues. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 37:46.Google Scholar
29. Sagaral, E. G. and Foy, C. L. 1982. Responses of several corn (Zea mays) cultivars and weed species to EPTC with and without the antidote R-25788. Weed Sci. 30:64–69.Google Scholar
30. Sheets, T. J. 1961. Uptake and distribution of simazine by oat and cotton seedlings. Weeds 9:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Standifer, L. C. and Thomas, C. H. 1965. Response of johnsongrass to soil incorporated trifluralin. Weed Sci. 13:302–308.Google Scholar
32. Stickler, R. L., Knake, E. L., and Hinesly, T. O. 1969. Soil moisture and effectiveness of pre-emergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 17:257–259.Google Scholar
33. Stolp, C. F. and Penner, D. 1973. Enhanced phytotoxicity of atrazine-phosphate combinations. Weed Sci. 21:37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Upchurch, R. P., Ledbetter, G. R., and Selman, F. L. 1963. The interaction of phosphorus with the phytotoxicity of soil applied herbicides. Weeds 11:36–41.Google Scholar
35. Walker, A. 1971. Effects of soil moisture content on the availability of soil applied herbicides to plants. Pestic. Sci. 2:56–59.Google Scholar
36. Wiebe, G. A. and Hayes, J. D. 1960. The role of genetics in the use of agricultural chemicals. Agron. J. 52:685–686.Google Scholar