Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T10:38:42.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Roy Harris, The semantics of science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2007

Randy Harris
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1, raha@watarts.uwaterloo.ca

Extract

Roy Harris, The semantics of science. London: Continuum International, 2005. Pp. xvi, 240. Hb $149.00, Pb $49.00

At least back to The language myth (1981), Roy Harris (not related to this reviewer) has plied variations of the same salvationist argument, in his customarily grumpy and entertaining style. If you're familiar with this argument, leap ahead to the third paragraph; if not, a quick synopsis, both of the errors he wants to save us from and of the salve he wants us to buy, will best place The semantics of science for you.

Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bazerman, Charles (1985). “Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema.” Written Communication 2:323.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bazerman, Charles (1999). The languages of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harris, Roy (1981). The language myth. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harris, Roy (2000). Rethinking writing. London: Athlone.
Harris, Roy (2001). Saussure and his interpreters. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRef
Harris, Roy (2003). The necessity of artspeak. London: Continuum.
Harris, Roy (2004). The linguistics of history. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Latour, Bruno (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno, & Woolgar, Steve (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Los Angeles: Sage.
Montgomery, Scott L. (1996). The scientific voice. New York: Guilford.
Poincaré, Henri (1952). Science and hypothesis. New York: Dover.
Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 84297. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.