Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:45:01.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The formation of growth coalitions: the role of the rural sector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2013

RICHARD GRABOWSKI
RICHARD GRABOWSKI*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA
*
*Email: ricardo@siu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The political elite require resources in order to survive politically. Given the conditions existing in most developing nations, this implies following an inward-oriented development strategy promoting a large-scale, capital-intensive industrial sector. This strategy impoverishes agriculture and implies that the leaders of the industrial sector will make up a critical component of the coalition providing political support to the political elite. Reform allowing for outward-oriented growth will be extremely difficult. Dramatically increasing agricultural productivity provides a means to provide political legitimacy for the ruling elite as well as the political leverage to bring about reform.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 329 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2000), ‘Political Losers as a Barrier to Economic Development’, American Economic Review, 90 (2): 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athukorala, P., Huong, P. L., and Thanh, V. T. (2007), ‘Vietnam’, in Anderson, K. and Martin, W. (eds.), Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Asia, Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 281–302.Google Scholar
Bramall, C. (2000), Sources of Chinese Economic Growth, 1978–1996, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission on Growth and Development (2008), The Growth Report: Strategies for Sustainable Growth and Inclusive Development, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Davis, D. (2004), Discipline and Development: Middle Classes and Prosperity in East Asia and Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dennis, B. N. and İşcan, T. B. (2011), ‘Agricultural Distortions, Structural Change, and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93 (3): 825–905.Google Scholar
Gallagher, M. and Hanson, J. K. (2009), ‘Coalitions, Carrots, and Sticks: Economic Inequality and Authoritarian States’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 42 (4): 667–672.Google Scholar
Glewwe, P. (2004), ‘An Overview of Economic Growth and Household Welfare in Vietnam in the 1990s’, in Glewwe, P., Agrawal, N., and Dollar, D. (eds.), Economic Growth, Poverty and Household Welfare in Vietnam, Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Gold, T. (1986), State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. and Li, W. (2005), ‘Tax Structure in Developing Countries: Many Puzzles and a Possible Explanation’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 11267, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. and Gallagher, M. (2012), ‘Winning Coalition Size and Economic Performances: The Selectorate Theory and East Asian Development States’, Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 2012.Google Scholar
Hayami, Y., Ruttan, V., and Southworth, H. (1979), Agricultural Growth in Japan, Taiwan, Korea, and the Philippines, Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Ho, S. P. S. (1978), Economic Development of Taiwan, 1860–1970, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, B. F. and Mellor, J. (1961), ‘The Role of Agriculture in Economic Development’, American Economic Review, 51 (4): 566–593.Google Scholar
Klump, R. (2007), ‘Pro-Poor Growth in Vietnam: Miracle on Model’, in Besley, T. and Cord, L. J. (eds.), Delivering on the Promise of Pro-Poor Growth: Insights and Lessons from Country Experiences, Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 119–146.Google Scholar
Kuo, T. C. and Myers, R. (2012), Taiwan's Economic Transformation: Leadership, Property Rights, and Institutional Change, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftwich, A. (2010), ‘Beyond Institutions: Rethinking the Role of leaders, Elites and Coalitions in the Institutional Formation of Developmental States and Strategies’, Forum for Development Studies, 37 (1): 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, M. (1988), Of Rule and Revenue, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lin, J., Cai, F., and Li, Z (2003), The China Miracle, Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Lin, S. (2009), ‘Tax Reforms in China and Russia’, Chinese Economy, 42 (3): 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y. L. and Liu, M. (2007), ‘Rural Taxation in China: Historical Evolution and Analytic Framework’, China and World Economy, 15 (3): 1–18.Google Scholar
Linh, Y. H. (2009), ‘Vietnam's Agricultural Productivity: A Malmquist Index Approach’, Working Paper 0903, Vietnam Development Forum.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (2007), Chinese Economic Performance in the Long-Term, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Malesky, E. (2009), ‘Gerrymandering – Vietnamese Style: Escaping the Partial Reform Equilibrium in a Nondemocratic Regime’, Journal of Politics, 71 (1): 132–159.Google Scholar
Mao, Y. K. and Schive, C. (1995), ‘Agricultural and Industrial Development in Taiwan’, in Mellor, J. (ed.), Agriculture on the Road to Industrialization, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Montinola, G., Qian, Y., and Weingast, B. R. (1995), ‘Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China’, World Politics, 48 (1): 50–81.Google Scholar
Moore, M. (2001), ‘Political Underdevelopment: What Causes Bad Governance’, Public Management Review, 3: 385–418.Google Scholar
Myers, R. and Ching, A. (1964), “Agricultural Development in Taiwan under Japanese Colonial Rule,” Journal of Asian Studies, 23 (4): 555–570.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., and Weingast, B. R. (2009), Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Human History, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quang, N. D. and Dung, N. T. (1997), ‘Tax Reform in Vietnam’, Vietnam Socio-Economic Development, 10: 3–16.Google Scholar
Rakotoarisoa, M. A. (2011), ‘The Impact of Agricultural Policy Distortions on the Productivity Gap: Evidence from Rice Production’, Food Policy, 36 (2): 147–157.Google Scholar
Shink, S. (1993), The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ut, T. J. and Kajsa, K. (2006), ‘The Impact of the Green Revolution on Rice Production in Vietnam’, The Developing Economics, 44 (2): 167–189.Google Scholar