Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:06:42.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of Contact Composition, Pretreatment, and Annealing Gas on the Ohmic Behavior of Ti/Al-Based Ohmic Contacts to n-Al0.4Ga0.6N

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

K. O. Schweitz
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
T. G. Pribicko
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
S. E. Mohney
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
T. F. Isaacs-Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Auburn University, AL 36849, USA
J. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Auburn University, AL 36849, USA
M. Pophristic
Affiliation:
Emcore Corporation, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
D. Gotthold
Affiliation:
Emcore Corporation, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
R. Birkhahn
Affiliation:
Emcore Corporation, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
I. Ferguson
Affiliation:
Emcore Corporation, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
Get access

Abstract

As the group III nitride semiconductor technology matures, an increasing number of devices are being fabricated with high Al fraction AlGaN. In this study, ohmic behavior is achieved using Ti/Al/Pt/Au contacts to n-Al0.4Ga0.6N, which is the highest Al fraction for which ohmic contact formation has been reported. The effect of contact composition, pretreatment, and annealing conditions is studied by 30 s isochronal annealing experiments between 500°C and 1000°C. A specific contact resistance ρC of (5±3) × 10−5 ωcm2 is obtained using Ti(26 nm)/Al(74 nm)/Pt(50 nm)/Au(50 nm) contacts to n-Al0.4Ga0.6N annealed in N2 at 800°C; however, this value is shown to be artificially high because the metal sheet resistance RM is 4 ω/⊏ causing an artifact in the data analysis. All contacts with ρC < 10−3 ωcm2 exhibit a local minimum in ρC after annealing at 800°C. The observed increase in ρC upon annealing at 850°C and 900°C, however, is not an artifact originating from a change in RM. The top Au layer is found to play an active role in forming ohmic contacts with low ρC, since omitting the Au layer yields an increase in ρC of two orders of magnitude after annealing at 800°C. Furthermore, leaving out the Au layer requires an annealing temperature of 700°C to result in linear I-V curves for currents up to 100 µA, as opposed to 500°C when the Au layer is present. The role of Au is further studied in Ti(26 nm)/Al(74 nm)/Ni(50 nm)/Au(50 nm) contacts, where Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy reveals Ga in the metal layer and/or Au buried deeper than the original semiconductor-metal interface, and x-ray diffraction indicates the formation of new phases to happen concurrently with a decrease in ρC of three orders of magnitude.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Omnes, F., Monroy, E., Calle, F., Muñoz, E., Beaumont, B. and Gibart, P., Opto-Electronics Review 8, 43 (2000).Google Scholar
[2] Kung, P. and Razeghi, M., Opto-Electronics Review 8, 201 (2000).Google Scholar
[3] Morkoç, H., Strite, S., Gao, G. B., Lin, M. E., Svedlov, B. and Borns, M., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 1363 (1994).Google Scholar
[4] Chen, Q., Khan, M. A., Yang, J. W., Sun, C. J., Shur, M. S. and Park, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 794 (1996).Google Scholar
[5] Khan, M. A., Shur, M. S. and Chen, Q., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3022 (1996).Google Scholar
[6] Wu, Y.-F., Keller, B. P., Keller, S., Kapolnek, D., Kozodoy, P., Denbaars, S. P. and Mishra, U. K., Solid-State Electron. 41, 1569 (1997).Google Scholar
[7] Schweitz, K. O. and Mohney, S. E., J. Electron. Mater. 30, 175 (2001).Google Scholar
[8] Wu, Y.-F., Keller, B. P., Keller, S., Nguyen, N. X., Le, M., Nguyen, C., Jenkins, T. J., Kehias, L. T., DenBaars, S. P. and Mishra, U. K., IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 18, 438 (1997).Google Scholar
[9] Tilak, V., Dimitrov, R., Murphy, M., Green, B., Smart, J., Schaff, W. J., Shealy, J. R. and Eastman, L. F. in Wide-Bandgap ElectronicDevices, edited by Shul, R. J., Ren, F., Murakami, M. and Pletschen, W., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 622, Pittsburgh, PA, 2000) T7.4.Google Scholar
[10] Bright, A. N., Thomas, P. J., Weyland, M., Tricker, D. M., Humphreys, C. J. and Davies, R., J. Appl. Phys. 89, 3143 (2001).Google Scholar
[11] Ruvimov, S., Liliental-Weber, Z., Washburn, J., Qiao, D., Lau, S. S. and Chu, P. K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2582 (1998).Google Scholar