Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:36:01.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hybrid Actuation in Coupled Ionic / Conducting Polymer Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Matthew D. Bennett Dr
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, 310 Durham Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Donald J. Leo
Affiliation:
Center for Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, 310 Durham Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Get access

Abstract

Ionic polymer membrane actuators represent a relatively new and exciting entry into the field of smart materials. Several key limitations of these transducers have prevented them from experiencing widespread use, however. For example, the bandwidth of these devices is limited at very low frequencies by characteristic relaxation and at high frequencies by the low elastic modulus of the polymer. In this paper, an overview of the initial results of work with hybrid ionic / conducting polymer actuators is presented. These hybrid actuators are devices that combine the electromechanical coupling of ionic polymer actuators and conducting polymer actuators into one coupled device. Initial results show that these hybrid devices have the potential to offer marked advantages over traditional ionic polymer membrane transducers, including increased stress and strain generation and higher actuation bandwidth. Details of the preparation of these devices and performance metrics are presented and comparisons to baseline materials are made.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mazzoldi, A. and De Rossi, D. in EAP Actuators and Devices, edited by Bar-Cohen, Yoseph, (SPIE proc. 3987, San Diego, CA, 2000) pp. 273280.Google Scholar
2. Lu, W., Fadeev, A. G., Qi, B., Smela, E., Mattes, B. R., Ding, J., Spinks, G. M., Mazurkiewicz, J., Zhou, D., Wallace, G. G., MacFarlane, D. R., Forsyth, S. A., and Forsyth, M., Science 297, 983987 (2002).10.1126/science.1072651Google Scholar
3. Bennett, M. D. and Leo, D. J., Smart Mater. Struct. 12, 424436 (2003).10.1088/0964-1726/12/3/314Google Scholar
4. Millet, P., Durand, R., Dartyge, E., Tourillon, G., and Fontaine, A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 13731379 (1993).10.1149/1.2221563Google Scholar
5. Onishi, K., Sewa, S., Asaka, K., Fujiwara, N., and Oguro, K., Electrochimica Acta 46, 737743 (2000).10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00656-3Google Scholar
6. Newbury, K. and Leo, D. J., J. Int. Mater. Sys. Struct. 13, 5160 (2002).10.1177/1045389X02013001978Google Scholar