Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:28:10.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physical Origin of a Size Effect in Nanoindentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

A.J. Bushby
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
J.R. Downes
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
N.B. Jayaweera
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
P. Kidd
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
A. Kelly
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke St., Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
D.J. Dunstan
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
Get access

Abstract

We have reported results of nanoindentation using spherical indenters to observe the full indentation stress-strain curve. We observe the onset of plasticity in semiconductor strained-layer superlattices. These structures have alternating layers with strains of opposite sign. The yield pressure is reduced by the presence of the coherency strain. By varying the thicknesses and strains, we have been able to show that both sets of layers, compressive and tensile, reduce the yield pressure. This requires that a yield criterion must be satisfied over a volume, large enough to include layers of both sign. In these studies, we observe a large and reproducible size effect in the yield pressure. That is, with smaller radius indenters the mean pressure acting over the contact area at the deviation from purely elastic behaviour increases, by up to a factor of two for a 2μm radius indenter tip. Here we show how the requirement for meeting a yield criterion over a finite volume naturally leads to the size effect. Essentially, with smaller radius indenters, the peak stresses must be greater in order to satisfy the yield criterion over a finite volume. By integrating the strain energy over a suitable volume we show that there is a critical volume of ≍ 0.5μm radius over which yield is initiated for all indenter radii in the range 1-35μm. This is an important result for the understanding of nanoindentation and other systems in which stresses are highly inhomogeneous on a small scale.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gane, N. and Bowden, P.F., J. Appl. Phys., 39, 1432, (1968)Google Scholar
2. Bushby, A.J. and Jennett, N.M., Determining the area function of spherical indenters for nanoindentation, this volume.Google Scholar
3. Lim, Y.Y., Bushby, A.J. and Chaudhri, M.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 522, 145, (1998)Google Scholar
4. Asif, S.A. Syed and Pethica, J.B., Phil Mag A, 76, 1105, (1997)Google Scholar
5. Page, T.F., Oliver, W.C. and McHargue, C.J., J. Mater. Res., 7, 450, (1992)Google Scholar
6. Pethica, J.B. and Oliver, W.C., Phys. scripta, T19, 61, (1987)Google Scholar
7. Gerberich, W.W., Nelson, J.C., Lilleodden, E.T., Anderson, P. and Wykobek, J.T., Acta Mater, 44, 3585, (1996)Google Scholar
8. Michalske, T.A. and Houston, J.E., Acta Mater, 46, 391, (1998)Google Scholar
9. Bahr, D.F., Wilson, D.E. and Crowson, D.A., J. Mater. Res., 14, 2269, (1999)Google Scholar
10. Dunstan, D.J., Kidd, P., Howard, L.K., and Dixon, R.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3390 (1991)Google Scholar
11. Jayaweera, N.B., Bushby, A.J., Kidd, P., Kelly, A. and Dunstan, D.J., Phil. Mag. Lett. 79, 343 (1999).Google Scholar
12. Brenchley, M.E., Hopkinson, M., Kelly, A., Kidd, P., and Dunstan, D.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3912 (1997).Google Scholar
13. Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V., J.Mater.Res., 8, 297, (1993)Google Scholar
14. Jayaweera, N.B., Downes, J.R., Dunstan, D.J., Bushby, A.J., Kidd, P. and Kelly, A., in, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, ‘Structure and mechanical properties of nanophase materials” (2001)Google Scholar
15. Yoffe, E.H., Phil. Mag. A.,46, 617 (1982)Google Scholar