No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Conventional vs Sustainable Transportation Fuels for the Future
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2011
Abstract
It is clear that in the next ten years major changes will be required in our liquids for transportation energy scenario. These changes are driven by two major factors. The first is the desire to achieve 'energy independence' and the second is the desire to achieve an 'environmentally friendly' fuel supply. These two forces will dominate energy research and development in the near future. This presupposes that the lack of viable hydrogen storage materials and the long-range electric vehicle materials will continue to be limiting the hydrogen and electric vehicle technology. The DOE recently reported that the available amounts of heavy hydrocarbons (tars, coal and shale oils) in North America (United States, Canada and Mexico) are sufficient for 500 years at current rates of usage. However, these sources must be converted to liquid transportation fuels in an environmentally favorable manner. Also, promising sources of sustainable liquid transportation fuels maybe found in growing algae and converting the contained lipids to biodiesel. In this presentation we discuss recent development in both areas that promise a smooth transition from conventional to the use of sustainable transportation fuel sources.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009
References
i “Facing the Hard Truths about Energy–A Comprehensive View to 2030 of Global Oil and Natural Gas”, (National Petroleum Council, Washington, DC, 2007); www.npc.org (accessed January 2008)Google Scholar
ii “Factors That Will Influence Oil and Gas Supply and Demand in the 21st Century”, Holdritch, Stephen A. and Chianelli, Russell R., MRS Bulletin, 33, 317–323 (2008).Google Scholar
iii “Unsupported Transition Metal Sulfide Catalysts: 100 years of Science and Application”, Chianelli, Russell R., Berhault, Gilles, Torres, Brenda, Catalysis Today, in press (2009).Google Scholar
iv “Asphaltenes, Heavy Oils and Petroleomics”, Chianelli, RR, Mehata, A, Pople, J, Ortega, L Carbognani, Chapter 15, “Self Assembly of Asphaltene Micelles: Synchrotron, Simulation and Chemical Modeling Techniques Applied to Problems in the Structure and Reactivity of Asphaltenes”, Ed. Mullins, OC, Sheu, EY, Marshall, AG, Springer Pub Co., New York
2006.Google Scholar
v Structure/Function Relations in Molybdenum Sulfide Catalysts: The “Rim-Edge Model, Daage, M. and Chianelli, R.R., J. Catal.
149, 414–427 (1994).Google Scholar
vi Catalyst for Emerging Energy Applications, Gates, Bruce C., Huber, George W., Marshall, Christopher L., Ross, Phillip N., Sirota, Jeffery and Wong, Yon, MRS Bulletin, 33, 429–435 (2008).Google Scholar
vii http://en.wikipedia.org/wikiGoogle Scholar
viii “Russia Top Offender in Gas-Flare”, The Boston Globe, June 21(2007).Google Scholar
ix “A Look Back at the U.S. Department of Energy's Aquatic Species Program-Biodiesel from Algae” Sheehan, J., Dunahay, T., Benemann, J. R., and Roessler, P., National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1998.Google Scholar
x Kretschmer, X. C., personal communication.Google Scholar
xi “How Are Sea Shells Created?” Scientific American, October 23, 2006.Google Scholar
xii “Nonlinear Electroseismic Exploration” Hornbostel, S. C., Thompson, A. H., Halsey, T. C., Raschke, R. A. and Davis, C. A., USPatent 664788, December 16(2003).Google Scholar