Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:58:18.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resource partitioning between two species of Ceutorhynchus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Echium plantagineum in a Mediterranean habitat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Guy J. Forrester*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Biological Control Unit, Montpellier, France
*
CSIRO Biological Control Unit, 335 Avenue Paul Parguel, 34090, Montpellier, France.

Abstract

Two weevil species, Ceutorhynchus geographicus (Goeze) and C. larvatus Schultze, feed on Echium plantagineum (Boraginaceae) in southern France. This paper shows that they do not compete for resources in the host's native environment. Niche overlaps of the two weevils were measured using the proportional overlap measure and Morisita's original index. The two species showed significant overlap in niche requirements during the egg and early larval stage. During the final two larval instars, larvae feed on different parts of the plant, C. geographicus in the tap root and C. larvatus in the root crown. Spatial separation in niche requirements is augmented by a temporal separation, C. larvatus emerging in the field about one month earlier than C. geographicus. In Europe and in Australia, to which E. plantagineum has been introduced and has become a serious weed, the host-plant has an extended germination period during the autumn. The differences in emergence times of the two species mean that their niches are separated both in time and in space. Should the two species be released into Australia they would not compete for resources. They may, however, be able to displace other species of the stemfeeding guild that are also proposed as candidates for the biological control of E. plantagineum.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auld, B.A. & Medd, R.W. (1987) Weeds: an illustrated botanical guide to the weeds of Australia. 255 pp. Melbourne, Inkata Press.Google Scholar
Burdon, J.J.Marshall, D.R. & Brown, A.H.D. (1983) Demographic and genetic changes in populations of Echium plantagineum. Journal of Ecology 71, 667679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, A.R., Tutin, T.G. & Moore, D.M. (1987) Flora of the British Isles. 3rd edn.1000 pp. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colonnelli, E. (1983) Alcune note di sistematica generale dei Ceutorhynchinae, con descrizione di un nuovo genere e ditre nuove specie (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Fragmenta entomologica 17: 159179.Google Scholar
Colwell, R.K. & Futuyma, D.J. (1971) On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology 52, 567576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullen, J.M. & Delfosse, E.S. (1985) Echium plantagineum: catalyst for conflict and change in Australia. pp. 249292in Delfosse, E.S. (Ed) Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds,August 19–25, 1984.Ottawa,Agriculture Canada.Google Scholar
Delfosse, E.S. (1985) Echium plantagineum in Australia: effects of a major conflict of interest. pp. 293299in Delfosse, E.S. (Ed) Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds,August 19–25, 1984.Ottawa,Agriculture Canada.Google Scholar
Delfosse, E.S. (in press) Biological control of Paterson's Curse: after the injunction. in Delfosse, E.S. & Scott, R.R. (Eds) Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds2–7 February 1992,Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.Melbourne, DSIR/CSIRO.Google Scholar
Forrester, G.J. (in press) Persistent seed banks, plant fitness and their importance in the control of annual weeds: a study of Echium plantagineum a winter annual weed of Mediterranean pasture. in Delfosse, E.S. & Scott, R.R. (Eds) Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds2–7 February 1992,Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.Melbourne, DSIR/CSIRO.Google Scholar
Hairston, N.G., Smith, F.E. & Slobodkin, L.B. (1960) Community structures, population control, and competition. American Naturalist 94, 421425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hespenheide, H.A. (1973) Ecological inferences from morphological data. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4, 213229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, A. (1954) Faune de France. 59. Coléoptères Curculionides (deuxièeme partie) pp. 4871208. Paris, Editions Lechevalier.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.E. (1951) Copepodology for the ornithologist. Ecology 32, 571577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.E. (1958) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium of Quantitative Biology 22, 415427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G.E. (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals? American Naturalist 93, 145159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, A.A. & Wapshere, A.J. (1979) The life history and host specificity of the Echium borer, Phytoecia coerulescens (Col. Cerambycidae). Entomophaga 24,423430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C.J. (1989) Ecological methodology. 654 pp. New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Lawton, J.H. & McNeill, S. (1979) Between the devil and the deep blue sea: on the problems of being a herbivore. pp. 223244in Anderson, R.M., Turner, B.D. & Taylor, L.R. (Eds) Population dynamics. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. & Levins, R. (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence and divergence of coexisting species. American Naturalist 101, 377385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. & Wilson, E.O (1967) The theory of island biogeography. 203 pp. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
May, R.M. & MacArthur, R. (1972) Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 69, 11091113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClure, M.S. & Price, P.W. (1976) Ecotope characteristics of coexisting Erythroneura leafhoppers (Homoptera; Cicadellidae) on sycamore. Ecology 57, 928940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, R.T. (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. American Naturalist 100, 6575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piggin, C.M. (1978) Flowering and seed production of Echium plantagineum L. Weed Research 18, 8387.Google Scholar
Rathke, J. (1976) Competition and coexistence within a guild of herbivorous insects. Ecology 57, 7687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T.W. (1965) The evolution of bill size differences among sympatric congeneric species of birds. Evolution 19, 189213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T.W. (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. American naturalist 122, 240285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E.P. & Zaret, T.M. (1982) Bias in estimating niche overlap. Ecology 63, 12481252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry. 859 pp. San FranciscoW.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.H., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., Webb, D.A. & Moore, D.M. (Eds) (1972) Flora Europea, Diapensiaceae to Myoporaceae. Volume III. 370 pp. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vayssieres, J.F. (1986) The immature stages of two Ceutorhynchus spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) found on Echium sp. (Boraginaceae). Nouvelle Revue d'Entomologie 3, 325331.Google Scholar
Vayssieres, J.F. & Wapshere, A.J. (1983) Life-histories and host specificities of Ceutorhynchus geographicus (Goeze) and C. larvatus Schultze (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), potential biological control agents for Echium. Bulletin of Entomological Research 73, 431440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wapshere, A.J. (1982) Life histories and host specificities of the Echium flea beetles Longitarsus echii and L. aeneus (Col., Chrysomelidae). Entomophaga 27, 173181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J.A. (1977) On competition in variable environments. American Science 65, 590597.Google Scholar