Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:32:00.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethical considerations of transparency, informed consent, and nudging in a patient with paediatric aortic stenosis and symptomatic left ventricular endocardial fibroelastosis*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2017

Constantine D. Mavroudis ,
Thomas Cook ,
Jeffrey P. Jacobs  and
Constantine Mavroudis
Constantine D. Mavroudis*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Thomas Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Rollins College, Winter Park, Florida, United States of America
Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital and Florida Hospital for Children, Saint Petersburg, Tampa, and Orlando, Florida, United States of America Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
Constantine Mavroudis
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital and Florida Hospital for Children, Saint Petersburg, Tampa, and Orlando, Florida, United States of America Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: C. Mavroudis, MD, Professor of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Site Director, Johns Hopkins Children’s Heart Surgery, Florida Hospital for Children, 2501 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 540, Orlando, FL 32804, United States of America. Tel: +407 303 3697; Fax: +407 303 3634; E-mail: constantine.mavroudis.md@flhosp.org.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 9-year-old boy who was born with bicuspid aortic stenosis underwent two unsuccessful aortic valvuloplasty interventions, and by 2 years of age he developed restrictive cardiomyopathy caused by left ventricular endocardial fibroelastosis and diastolic dysfunction. The attending cardiologist referred the patient to a high-volume, high-profile congenital cardiac surgical programme 1000 miles away that has a team with considerable experience with left ventricular endocardial fibroelastosis resection and a reputation of achieving good results. Owing to problems with insurance coverage, the parents sought other options for the care of their child in their home state. Dr George Miller is a well-respected local congenital and paediatric cardiac surgeon with considerable experience with the Ross operation as well as with right ventricular endocardial fibroelastosis resection. When talking with Dr Miller, he implied that there is little difference between right ventricular endocardial fibroelastosis and left ventricular endocardial fibroelastosis resection, and stated that he would perform the operation with low mortality based on his overall experience. Dr Miller stated that the local institution could provide an equivalent surgical procedure with comparable outcomes, without the patient and family having to travel out of state. A fundamental dilemma that often arises in clinical surgical practice concerns the conduct of assessing and performing new procedures, especially in rare cases, for which the collective global experience is scant. Although Dr Miller has performed right ventricular endocardial fibroelastosis resection, this procedure differs from left ventricular endocardial fibroelastosis resection, and he cannot be sure that he will indeed be able to perform the procedure better than the high-volume surgeon. This ethical situation is best understood in terms of the principles of respect for patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. The tension between the imperatives of beneficence and the obligation to respect the autonomy of the patient by acting only with the patient’s best interest in mind is discussed.

Keywords

Medical ethicspatient rightsnudgingvirtueethics
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 26 , Special Issue 8: HeartWeek 2016 , December 2016 , pp. 1573 - 1580
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Presented at the Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute 16th International Symposium on Congenital Heart Disease, Special Focus: Pediatric and Congenital Diseases of the Aorta, Co-Sponsor: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States of America, Saturday, 13 February, 2016 to Tuesday, 16 February, 2016.

References

1. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th edn. Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2009.Google Scholar
2. Cook, T, Mavroudis, CD, Jacobs, JP, Mavroudis, C. Respect for patient autonomy as a medical virtue. Cardiol Young 2015; 25: 1615–1620.Google Scholar
3. Mavroudis, C, Mavroudis, CD, Jacobs, JP, et al. Procedure-based frequency of complications to guide informed consent in congenital heart surgery: an analysis from the STS-Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97: 1838–1849.Google Scholar
4. Aristotle. Ars Rhetorica. In: Ross WD (ed.) OCT. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1959.Google Scholar
5. Plato Gorgias 456a: in Plato the Collected Dialogues. In: Hamilton E, Cairns H (eds). Copyright renewed by Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
6. Swindell, JS, McGuire, AL, Halpern, SD. Beneficent persuasion: techniques and ethical guidelines to improve patients’ decisions. Ann Fam Med 2010; 8: 260–264.Google Scholar
7. Thaler, RH, Sunstein, CR. Libertarian paternalism. Am Econ Rev 2003; 93: 175–179.Google Scholar
8. Cohen, S. Nudging and informed consent. Am J Bioethics 2013; 13: 3–11.Google Scholar
9. Thaler, RH, Sunstein, CR. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin Books, New York, NY, 2008.Google Scholar
10. Thaler, RH. Nudges, for good and bad. New York Times. 1 November, 2015.Google Scholar
11. Murray, E, Charles, C, Gafni, A. Shared decision-making in primary care: tailoring the Charles et al. model to fit the context of general practice. Patient Ed Counsel 2006; 62: 205–211.Google Scholar
12. Charles, C, Gafni, A, Whelan, T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 681–692.Google Scholar
13. Charles, C, Gafni, A, Whelan, T. Decision-making in the physician patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49: 651–661.Google Scholar
14. Emani, SM, McElhinney, DB, Tworetzky, W, et al. Staged left ventricular recruitment after single-ventricle palliation in patients with borderline left heart hypoplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1966–1974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Robinson, JD, Del Nido, PJ, Geggel, RL, et al. Left ventricular diastolic heart failure in teenagers who underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty in early infancy. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106: 426–429.Google Scholar
16. Landymore, RW, Kinley, CE, Gardner, M. Encircling endocardial resection with complete removal of endocardial scar without intraoperative mapping for the ablation of drug-resistant ventricular tachycardia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 89: 18–24.Google Scholar
17. Mavroudis, C, Deal, BJ, Backer, CL, Tsao, S. Arrhythmia surgery in patients with and without congenital heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 857–868.Google Scholar
18. Sabate Rotes, A, Connolly, HM, Warnes, CA, et al. Ventricular arrhythmia risk stratification in patients with tetralogy of Fallot at the time of pulmonary valve replacement. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2015; 8: 110–116.Google Scholar
19. Jacobs, JP, He, X, Mayer, JE Jr, Austin, EH 3rd, Quintessenza, JA, Karl, TR, Vricella, L, Mavroudis, C, O'Brien, SM, Pasquali, SK, Hill, KD, Husain, SA, Overman, DM, St Louis, JD, Han, JM, Shahian, DM, Cameron, D, Jacobs, ML. Mortality trends in pediatric and congenital heart surgery: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;102(4):1345–52. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.071. Epub 2016 Aug 31. PMID: 27590683.Google Scholar
20. Jacobs, JP, Cerfolio, RJ, Sade, RM. The ethics of transparency: publication of cardiothoracic surgical outcomes in the lay press. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 679–686.Google Scholar
21. Shahian, DM, Edwards, FH, Jacobs, JP, et al. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: part 1-history, rationale, consequences. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92 (Suppl): S2–S11.Google Scholar
22. Shahian, DM, Edwards, FH, Jacobs, JP, et al. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: part 2-implementation. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92 (Suppl): S12–S23.Google Scholar
23. Jacobs, JP, Jacobs, ML. Transparency and public reporting of pediatric and congenital heart surgery outcomes in North America. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2016; 7: 49–53.Google Scholar
24. Jacobs, JP, O’Brien, SM, Pasquali, SK, et al. Clark Paper: variation in outcomes for benchmark operations: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Richard Clark Award recipient for best use of the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: 2184–2192.Google Scholar
25. Jacobs, JP, O’Brien, SM, Pasquali, SK, et al. Variation in outcomes for risk-stratified pediatric cardiac surgical operations: an analysis of the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94: 564–572.Google Scholar
26. O’Brien, SM, Jacobs, JP, Pasquali, SK, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database mortality risk model: part 1-statistical methodology. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100: 1054–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Jacobs, JP, O’Brien, SM, Pasquali, SK, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database mortality risk model: part 2-clinical application. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100: 1063–1070.Google Scholar
28. Pasquali, SK, Jacobs, ML, O’Brien, SM, et al. Impact of patient characteristics on hospital-level outcomes assessment in congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100: 1071–1077.Google Scholar